And I will still not separately pay for Windows. Not because of any hatred of Microsoft or because I disagree with this or because I'll pirate it, but because like many other people, it will be preinstalled on whatever laptop I purchase.
@diabolusunknownTheSecond: My desktop is just a media server/spare internet terminal. I have no need to custom-build it. My current one is a low-end refurb bought for $300 at Christmas. It replaced an 8+ year-old Dell Dimension.
I'll never understand why they need to make multiple versions of the same OS. Why make like Apple and just have one OS, maybe there would be less confusion from consumers and more stability for users.
@TheGuinnessTooth: Because the home market and the business market are two different markets. And it worked with XP.
Given that Microsoft is a thirty year-old software company with over $200 billion in market capitalization which makes an operating system capable of running an extraordinarily wide array of hardware, I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that they know how to run their business.
@TheGuinnessTooth: It's just a form of price discrimination. Some features are only valuable to a subset of consumers, so MS has a high-priced version for them. However, other consumers are not willing to pay the high price but do not need the extra features, so they get a low-priced version.
Yeah, I'm sticking with Vista then... unless I save up enough for an Apple. I am not paying an arm and leg for that software not even if Jesus himself blessed it. In these economic times, Microsoft, should not be pricing their OS so high.
@newdeepdan: You know, if you ask him nicely, I'm sure Jesus would send you a Tweet wishing you many happy returns on whatever computing platform you're presently using.
Of course, it could just be that one of the three flavors is way overpriced and blowing out the average...."if you want the ultimate, you've got to be willing to pay the ultimate price"
@Chimera: Either that OR the average selling price of the SYSTEMS is higher. Lord knows what all that entails. Maybe there isnt a shitbox version of 7 that runs on those crappy laptops with horrible controllers.
@archercc: I thought that too -- but I read the linked Cnet article and the analyst was definitely talking about the price of the OS, not the system as a whole.
Not only is there One OSX that is $130...but you can get iLife added on for an extra $40. This is a rumor sure, but if it's true, weaksauce MS. Weaksauce.
Oh! And why doesn't Win7 have a native PDF reader in 200-freaking-9? Sorry, recently found this out playing with the beta and could not believe my eyes. Honestly, They hamstring themselves around every corner.
@MasterSauce: If lack of a built-in pdf reader is your biggest gripe with Windows 7, then that's not too bad.
I don't like the Network & Sharing Center. There is no way to prioritize networks like in XP. My current router broadcasts two signals and I don't like when a hiccup makes my laptop switch between the two.
Microsoft is in the same position as Adobe. GIMP is available, but GIMP is also a piece of shit on the interface end, and will likely not replace anything by Adobe for a long time, so it's the only game in town. Linux is not a piece of shit, but it sure isn't a substantial enough lure to regular users, so Windows is the only game in town on the open-hardware OS end, so Windows can be priced higher without as much issue.
I've only ever tried Ubuntu (on the basis that it is the most Windows/Mac like) and, while people trash the notion of eye candy, the truth is I don't like the feel of the UI. It really doesn't have enough flash to it.
I was a fan of the general feel of Tiger and love the frosted glass look of Windows 7. Ubuntu just kind of feels low-grade - like the difference between a Hyundai and a Lexis.
06/25/09
06/25/09
06/25/09
06/25/09
06/25/09
06/25/09
06/25/09
06/25/09
"Stand alone versions of Windows 7, that can run on more than one PC, will also be available."
and
"In the UK the upgrade version of the Home Premium edition of Windows 7, available to those with an existing Windows license, will be £79.99.
By contrast buying this in a shop, and which can be installed on more than one machine, will cost £149.99."
note the More Than One Machine point. hang on a minute??
you mean I could buy 1 full copy and Legally put it on say 2 machines???
06/25/09
06/25/09
But im sure paying 50 bucks for an OS is going to make many people happy. Games cost that much.
06/25/09
My power computing is done on laptops.
06/25/09
06/25/09
Given that Microsoft is a thirty year-old software company with over $200 billion in market capitalization which makes an operating system capable of running an extraordinarily wide array of hardware, I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that they know how to run their business.
06/25/09
05/22/09
05/22/09
He's quite affable and always the gentleman.
05/22/09
05/22/09
05/22/09
02/06/09
• Windows 7 Home Premium: $100
• Windows 7 Professional: $150
• Windows 7 Ultimate: $199
02/06/09
02/06/09
02/06/09
02/06/09
Oh! And why doesn't Win7 have a native PDF reader in 200-freaking-9? Sorry, recently found this out playing with the beta and could not believe my eyes. Honestly, They hamstring themselves around every corner.
02/06/09
02/06/09
I don't like the Network & Sharing Center. There is no way to prioritize networks like in XP. My current router broadcasts two signals and I don't like when a hiccup makes my laptop switch between the two.
02/06/09
02/06/09
02/06/09
02/06/09
I've only ever tried Ubuntu (on the basis that it is the most Windows/Mac like) and, while people trash the notion of eye candy, the truth is I don't like the feel of the UI. It really doesn't have enough flash to it.
I was a fan of the general feel of Tiger and love the frosted glass look of Windows 7. Ubuntu just kind of feels low-grade - like the difference between a Hyundai and a Lexis.
02/06/09
Ubuntu can be customized to look like just about anything.
02/06/09
02/07/09