To be fair, app browsing isn't all that great on *any* phone. In fact, I have yet to use a single mobile device (including the iPhone, thankyouverymuch) that I actually prefer browsing on over a full compy. Fullsite app browsing = generally awesome in my book.
I love Zune and have all 3 version but you can't help but to think that one day future xboxes and windows will be all you have left. #windowsmobilemarketplace
@Gundem: I'm sorry, did you just call Microsoft M$ (which, by the way, has been ruled to be "old" and "unoriginal" as of about 3 years ago), then express your dire love for the Zunes? I...
"Well, the new online portal seems like a solid idea, albeit one that implicitly acknowledges that app browsing is not that great on a WinMo 6.5 phone. You can access the portal from any browser, taking advantage of your computer's larger screen and faster loading to find apps that much quicker."
I dunno about that - I wouldn't be so quick to say that it acknowledges that so much as it comes as a logical step. I mean... look at the iPhone App Store. I personally hardly ever use the app store from the phone, unless it's to grab some free app that I need to use for whatever reason that has come up. Based on my experience, and that of the people I know, I'd say that the App Store within iTunes is more of the main one, with the mobile app store browser being more of an added convenience. So I'd say that Microsoft has their head on straight here - It's just that they had the mobile marketplace available first as a catalog available on its mobile devices, and now they're completing and solidifying the idea through a desktop version.
edit: PS - I miss the <blockquote> tags... they made quotes so much more intuitive and easier to read and comprehend in context at first glance.
@brobot: When you criticize Gizmodo you have to take into account that this is an Apple lover's site. They are lastly tending to ditch non Apple stuff specially when it comes to mobile devices. I own an iPodtouch an I have to say it's a nightmare if I want to find a non top 25 or featured App. Its the way it is, we are talking about a small screen device, same goes for windows mobile. But the author is turning a good service for windows mobile customers into yet an other reason to ditch the windows mobile platform. #windowsmobilemarketplace
@HelloYouAll: errrrmmm... I don't know where you got the idea that I was criticizing gizmodo from my comment... Especially since you basically just re-stated the entire point of my comment, except with an anti-giz spin on it by talking about apple bias before saying "the author is turning a good service for windows mobile customers into yet an other reason to ditch the windows mobile platform."
To every person who ever previously/currently/henceforth whines about gizmodo's apple bias, I, Bepoptimus Prime, hereby officially declare #Shenanigans. - All the whining is 100x more annoying than any bias in the first place. sheesh. cry about it#windowsmobilemarketplace
1) They actually outright state that the "basic" protection is simply requiring that someone sign in with a Live ID before they can download, then deleting the CAB file. It's phrased to imply that there's more going on, but that's it.
2) Apparently only a few hypothetical "super-hackers" could possibly work around the protection provided by (1)
3) The expensive, premium protection is seemingly the same old tie-the-app-to-the-IMEI patching of the binary that everyone and their dog uses, which is probably trivial to hack too.
I had heard that he was just hijacking the CAB file. It's probably downloading to some temp location. If you make a copy of that CAB while the installer is running, you should be able to then copy the CAB to any other WinMo device. Most of them have a point where they prompt for input (install to device or to card is a good candidate) and you can probably grab it then.
If they use Pocket IE, then it's very likely in that standard directory. A quick "Chandler" should find the full path. You could probably even write a small app that automatically mirrored any CAB file out of there.
@SQLGuru: Yes, that's basically it. Although to be fair, the documentation spells this out pretty clearly. It also talks about an alternate key-based system that involves adding some code to your program. I think maybe that's not available yet.
I'm still undecided on whether to submit my software to the Marketplace. I'm not worried about piracy much, as they're only $1.99 apps anyway. But the expense and trouble that seems to be involved in getting things approved is an impediment to individual developers like me.
I have two apps now in the Samsung App Store. That was very cheap and easy, and it has a pretty good copy protection scheme, tied to the phone's ID.
@CSX321: Do you have a good "finger friendly" set of widgets that you use for your app? I have an app that I've started writing, but with no native controls as part of the SDK, I'm torn between continuing working on it and giving up. (I'm more of a function over form guy.) My app is about 90% done in terms of function but only about 10% done in terms of "pretty" -- at least the version I plan on giving away for free. Then I would release a "pro" version with additional features.
As for piracy, I'm really writing it for me but wouldn't mind a few buck from others who find it just as useful.
@SQLGuru: I got started writing stuff for myself, too.
No, I don't really have a set of controls or anything yet. I have a C# image button class I did for one app. For other things, I just space them so they can be hit easily with a finger. Oh, I also have a form base class with "flick" gesture support and the ability to slide up, down, left, or right between forms. I've pretty much found the limits of what can be done graphics-wise with the .NET 2 CF.
For my apps I have demo versions that have limited features and nag screens, but no time limit. They can be activated with an RPN key (Handango-style) to full version status. I haven't decided yet whether to put them on Handango, etc. 50% is a lot compared to Samsung's and Microsoft's 30%.
Sorry to be a little off-topic here but I have a serious question about smartphones:
What would be best phone for texting for a 63 year-old woman losing her voice with so-so sight. It would primarily be for texting. It's for my mom who is not doing well.
@OMG! Ponies!: the Palm Centro seems to be choice of the overall consensus for older folk due to it's simplicity - other than maybe check out the HTC fuse too although it might be "too many bells and whistles"
@RenegadeIrishman_IsFullOfStars: No, all you have is probably the most advanced of all the cell phone OS's underneath (true multitasking, native copy/paste from day one, etc.), but which is behind in the interface department. So, you take TouchFlo3D, which is an improved interface, and put it on top of Windows Mobile, which is the most advanced underlying OS, and voila. You now have a phone more powerful than the iPhone that also looks and works as good or better (in most ways). Not even the iPhone has a 3D interface.
@badasscat: you cant just slap an interface on an OS without it being coded for it or It results in poor performance and integration. I'm not a Microsoft hater in any way I just think their phone OS is way outdated. I didn't mean to imply that they were incapable, merely that they were late. I used humor though, so as to entertain the masses.
For all those who would say that MS can't get anything right, I have almost always loved their 3rd and 4th iterations of a product. I am not a fan boy by any means, but I thought the PS3 would destroy the 360, and I have two 360s, and no desire to get a PS3.
I have two iPods, a Zune, about 10 other various and sundry mp3 players, and have to say that if it were not for the nike+, I would probably never use my iPod.
I just hope that MS gives it a more serious try than Google.
The new phone will be named iOwn, where Microsoft and Verizon will find a way to even further nickel and dime you for what will turn out to be a heavily crippled feature phone.
@android: Never. Current verizon phones are so heavily laden with their proprietary user overlays that they already crash happily on their own.
Nothing like going to send a text message only your phone reboots, or flipping the damn thing open to answer a call for the screen to stay black and keep ringing at you until you pull the battery off to reset the damn thing.
Or, how they used to charge you $5 per month for browsing the web on your feature phone, but now they charge $10+ depending on which package you pick. And half the time when you go to use your phone it comes back with, "Network unavailable."
Sorry, the only thing I've found Verizon's network good for is not dropping a call. Anything else, their phones suck, their customer service sucks, their pricing sucks.
@android: has been aproved by the gizmolords: My feelings aren't hurt. I'm just being a realist about Verizon, its practices in disabling phone features it doesn't like so that you have to pay them to use them. (VZW GPS Navigation on the BB Storm anyone?)
They provide about the best phone coverage I've seen for cell phones over most of the US and have one of the more advanced networks.
They will just seriously gouge you for every penny that they can.
11/12/09
(Google: I'm talking to you.) #windowsmobilemarketplace
11/12/09
I love Zune and have all 3 version but you can't help but to think that one day future xboxes and windows will be all you have left. #windowsmobilemarketplace
11/12/09
I think something broke. #windowsmobilemarketplace
11/12/09
11/12/09
I dunno about that - I wouldn't be so quick to say that it acknowledges that so much as it comes as a logical step. I mean... look at the iPhone App Store. I personally hardly ever use the app store from the phone, unless it's to grab some free app that I need to use for whatever reason that has come up. Based on my experience, and that of the people I know, I'd say that the App Store within iTunes is more of the main one, with the mobile app store browser being more of an added convenience. So I'd say that Microsoft has their head on straight here - It's just that they had the mobile marketplace available first as a catalog available on its mobile devices, and now they're completing and solidifying the idea through a desktop version.
edit: PS - I miss the <blockquote> tags... they made quotes so much more intuitive and easier to read and comprehend in context at first glance.
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
To every person who ever previously/currently/henceforth whines about gizmodo's apple bias, I, Bepoptimus Prime, hereby officially declare #Shenanigans. - All the whining is 100x more annoying than any bias in the first place. sheesh. cry about it #windowsmobilemarketplace
10/09/09
1) They actually outright state that the "basic" protection is simply requiring that someone sign in with a Live ID before they can download, then deleting the CAB file. It's phrased to imply that there's more going on, but that's it.
2) Apparently only a few hypothetical "super-hackers" could possibly work around the protection provided by (1)
3) The expensive, premium protection is seemingly the same old tie-the-app-to-the-IMEI patching of the binary that everyone and their dog uses, which is probably trivial to hack too.
10/09/09
If they use Pocket IE, then it's very likely in that standard directory. A quick "Chandler" should find the full path. You could probably even write a small app that automatically mirrored any CAB file out of there.
10/09/09
[blogs.msdn.com]
"\Windows\Profiles\guest\Temporary Internet Files".
Anyone with the WinMo app store that can verify this for 6.5?
10/09/09
I'm still undecided on whether to submit my software to the Marketplace. I'm not worried about piracy much, as they're only $1.99 apps anyway. But the expense and trouble that seems to be involved in getting things approved is an impediment to individual developers like me.
I have two apps now in the Samsung App Store. That was very cheap and easy, and it has a pretty good copy protection scheme, tied to the phone's ID.
10/09/09
As for piracy, I'm really writing it for me but wouldn't mind a few buck from others who find it just as useful.
10/09/09
No, I don't really have a set of controls or anything yet. I have a C# image button class I did for one app. For other things, I just space them so they can be hit easily with a finger. Oh, I also have a form base class with "flick" gesture support and the ability to slide up, down, left, or right between forms. I've pretty much found the limits of what can be done graphics-wise with the .NET 2 CF.
For my apps I have demo versions that have limited features and nag screens, but no time limit. They can be activated with an RPN key (Handango-style) to full version status. I haven't decided yet whether to put them on Handango, etc. 50% is a lot compared to Samsung's and Microsoft's 30%.
09/03/09
What would be best phone for texting for a 63 year-old woman losing her voice with so-so sight. It would primarily be for texting. It's for my mom who is not doing well.
09/03/09
09/03/09
09/03/09
AMIRITE!?
09/03/09
(oh, snap)
09/03/09
(oh wait-)
09/03/09
enjoy your BSOD's : )
09/03/09
09/02/09
09/02/09
You can cover it up with touch-flow all you want but all you've got is a painted turd of an OS
09/02/09
09/02/09
04/28/09
They're going to need to reinvent the wheel to compete in this market.
04/28/09
I have two iPods, a Zune, about 10 other various and sundry mp3 players, and have to say that if it were not for the nike+, I would probably never use my iPod.
I just hope that MS gives it a more serious try than Google.
04/28/09
I'm so confused by MS.
04/28/09
04/28/09
04/28/09
04/28/09
04/28/09
Nothing like going to send a text message only your phone reboots, or flipping the damn thing open to answer a call for the screen to stay black and keep ringing at you until you pull the battery off to reset the damn thing.
Or, how they used to charge you $5 per month for browsing the web on your feature phone, but now they charge $10+ depending on which package you pick. And half the time when you go to use your phone it comes back with, "Network unavailable."
Sorry, the only thing I've found Verizon's network good for is not dropping a call. Anything else, their phones suck, their customer service sucks, their pricing sucks.
04/28/09
But now I know I'll shop around instead of going with VZ
04/28/09
They provide about the best phone coverage I've seen for cell phones over most of the US and have one of the more advanced networks.
They will just seriously gouge you for every penny that they can.