That's the problem with being advanced and trying to do things in a new way. Sometimes they don't work out quite right when they're expected to. And it's not like Boeing's going to notice a gadget blog snarking about it, but it IS a little tiresome to hear.
@irfan: True, but not take off. It wouldn't have enough thrust. A plane can continue to remain aloft if one engine dies, or if both die and Sully is aboard.
Give it a rest. It'll fly when it's ready. Techinically it COULD fly now, the issue is that the structural integrety isn't up to Boeing's own standards which are much higher than the FAA's. They're not going ahead with flight testing because the data they'd get would be useless for tests they do after the fix. They know what they need to fix and how to fix it, its mostly a supply line issue at this point that will set it back an extra few months. The fact is the airlines don't really care right now because they don't have the cash to pay for them right now anyway so they can ride out the delays without bitching, and then not only get them when they're ready, they can tell Boeing to cough up some compensation for the delay.
07/31/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
Hey-O!
07/30/09
07/30/09
@anexanhume aka Flintheart Glomgold: Err, can I get an image upload brotha?
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09