Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Kyle VanHemert
Comment Account Questions:
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
12/04/09
12/03/09
... Jason Chen needs to eat more fiber!
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
Or, I could start a contest to see who could gain the most the fastest!
You sir, have just started a new game.
11/30/09
11/30/09
There are many applications where a $600 price for this technology today is warranted.
Instead of forming opinions for your readers in the opening paragraph of your article, try being objective about the product. Tell us what we need to know, and inject your opinion at the end. That helps us, and will in the long run help Gizmodo.
11/30/09
11/30/09
But stating "don't buy it" instead of "hard to come up with reasons to buy it" sends the wrong message to advertisers and users.
It certainly can be your opinion, as a general home user, not to purchase the product. But would your opinion change if I told you I'm a entertainment venue with a few projector screens, or a network operating center with a large display? Those applications make perfect sense, even at $600. And people that work in those fields read your articles every day.
Surely you're not going to tell those large sections of your readership to go elsewhere?
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
Never heard of Rocketfish before today.
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/29/09
STOOOOOOOOOOPID
11/29/09
Then for a while you had to look at the crazies to see which ones were just douchebags with bluetooth.
Now there's really no way to tell. "Is that guy giving God stock advice?"
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
Unless...
11/19/09
$30(per month savings)*24(months)+$220(savings on phone)=$940.
In my mind there is nothing the iPhone can do that justifies an extra $1000 over the Pre.
Of course both Sprint's and AT&T's coverage suck in Chicago (especially AT&T's) so I'm on Verizon.
11/19/09
Lest we forget, the 8GB iPhone 3G is $99. And still a better phone than the Pre.
See, I kinda sound like a douche right now. I must be a totally satisfied iPhone customer!
11/19/09
I'm betting the only reason your friends regret it is the fact they don't have nearly as many apps. As for the iPhone, if you like getting gouged on monthly rates, I suppose anyone can be happy.
11/19/09
11/19/09
AT&T on the other hand works fine in my condo, but elsewhere in the city, not so much.
As much as I hate Verizon, I've never been without coverage in the city.