Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
@Pope John Peeps II: I assume you aren't ignorant enough to assume that somehow wireless means magic. In other words... yeah, it has a wire to plug the pad in, and uses magnetic induction to transfer power to the device without a wire. It isn't running on fairy dust and unicorn sprinkles.
@Pope John Peeps II: Of coarse there is a cord to the wall, it doesn't send electricity flying through the air Tesla style.
"Amazingly useless"? Does it not charge your device? Call me crazy, but if it charges my phone how exactly is it "useless"? Overpriced for sure, but useless? nah
@Kelly Adams: Are you HIGH? Are you DUMB? What's the purpose of this? Sure it's "wireless", but you have to put your phone in EXACTLY this spot and LEAVE IT THERE.
IT'S EXACTLY THE SAME AS PLUGGING IT IN. BUT VASTLY MORE INEFFICIENT AND EXPENSIVE. THIS IS THE HEIGHT OF USELESS.
And the fact is that it's hardly an aesthetic marvel, because in the end you STILL have a cord to hide!
@Shadowfury: There's a new radio commercial for Franks Hot Sauce in which the tagline is "I put that ::bleep:: on everything::!" [www.franksredhot.com]
This just proves that, despite the fashionable hype about protecting the environment and conserving energy, people are just greedy consumer-whores who want instant gratification and will waste as much energy as necessary to get it.
Induction charging has been around for many years now, but it is inherently wasteful, as the increased amount of power required to creative the induction field means there will be power loss. No amount of materials science will improve that, it's simply a matter of electrical science. The benefit of induction charging has typically been for devices that, for safety reasons, can not have exposed contacts, such as underwater devices, or devices that must be sealed in environments with potentially fammable gasses, etc.
To wilfully and wantonly waste power this way, to no apparent gain, is just incredibly vain and ignorant. I'm apalled that Gizmodo would even report on such a device without looking deeper into the global impact of the device.
@BeautifulAgony: We humans will waste power on all sorts of things. People will cram their homes with lots of power-hungry appliances, and Giz will likely report on a great deal of their kinds, and this warrants a complaint? Sweet fancy Jesus (the 2,000 year old dude, not the Gizmodo dude, though he might be fancy, I don't know).
@darknecross: I think he/she meant something along the lines of damage caused by the wireless electronic signals. For example, the RF signals sent from cell phones are possibly dangerous and may lead to an increased risk of cancer.
10/08/09
Best line ever!
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
This is amazingly useless. I mean... really, astonishingly useless.
10/08/09
10/08/09
"Amazingly useless"? Does it not charge your device? Call me crazy, but if it charges my phone how exactly is it "useless"? Overpriced for sure, but useless? nah
10/08/09
IT'S EXACTLY THE SAME AS PLUGGING IT IN. BUT VASTLY MORE INEFFICIENT AND EXPENSIVE. THIS IS THE HEIGHT OF USELESS.
And the fact is that it's hardly an aesthetic marvel, because in the end you STILL have a cord to hide!
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
Let's hope for something funny.
10/07/09
@Shadowfury: There's a new radio commercial for Franks Hot Sauce in which the tagline is "I put that ::bleep:: on everything::!"
[www.franksredhot.com]
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/08/09
01/08/09
Induction charging has been around for many years now, but it is inherently wasteful, as the increased amount of power required to creative the induction field means there will be power loss. No amount of materials science will improve that, it's simply a matter of electrical science. The benefit of induction charging has typically been for devices that, for safety reasons, can not have exposed contacts, such as underwater devices, or devices that must be sealed in environments with potentially fammable gasses, etc.
To wilfully and wantonly waste power this way, to no apparent gain, is just incredibly vain and ignorant. I'm apalled that Gizmodo would even report on such a device without looking deeper into the global impact of the device.
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
If you mean electrocution, there's no risk of that.
The same tech is already being used with electric toothbrushes and shavers.
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09