@asmodeus: I think it is being resized improperly. The pic itself is 78 pixels wide, but the source says it is being resized to 158, which is 2 pixels more than twice the size, screwing everything up. Or it could be 2 pixels too small, since on the front page it looks fine, although cropped at the bottom, and it is set to 160 there...
Course, I know jack all about image resizing. AND html. But I'm bored, so I looked around.
Does the watch come with the neato LV case with wallet and other great LV stuff. I think this belongs in a rap video, where the interior of the car is decked out in LV. Hmm...wheres Xzbit pimp my ride and make this the center armor rest console.
Not a fan. It looks cool, but it also looks way too space-age to me to wear on a daily basis. I can't imagine ever wearing any other watch besides the silver-and-black 'lex my grandfather left me.
Isn't it incredibly irresponsible to spend $250k on a watch? The sheer concept of a watch at that value is ludicrous. That kind of purchase isnt about fashion, and it's certainly not about practicality. It's a vain attempt to feign confidence, and it's really just indicative of the same kind of thinking that's brought our global economy to its knees.
@ar7983: Most of your high end watch collectors have a distinct love for engineering and craftsmanship. Some of these things take decades to engineer, and years to assemble, by hand. Once you hit ~$100k you're out of blingy poseur territory and into investment pieces.
I have never desired any louis vuitton product, but I can say that I like the idea of a mini steamer trunk for my watches. Carrying them on extended voyages has always been a central occupation in my life, "as a luggage problem", that is.
@iEro-Sennin: I work in an office where I have to lock my phone in a safe, there's not a computer at the desk I use half the time, and there are no clocks in the room. I like being able to tell time all the time.
@iEro-Sennin: With the high end stuff is more about a love of design and engineering than practicality.
In the larger scheme of watches this isn't all that expensive. Take a look at what a Patek Philippe Sky Moon Toubillon or Vacheron Constantin Tour de l'Ile.
@Kaiser-Machead: Yeah, for $250,000 you'd expect it to at least use magnets or something to levitate the center piece. I'm still not exactly sure how this thing works. If the hour and second hand are supported by sapphire disks, aren't they continuously scraping across them as they move?
@Kaiser-Machead: Hmm. I think you're onto something there with that last part. This is most likely the earliest stage in Louis's plot to eradicate the resistance.
09/20/09
09/19/09
I need one now.
09/19/09
09/19/09
09/20/09
Course, I know jack all about image resizing. AND html. But I'm bored, so I looked around.
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=11600
07/09/09
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=11600
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
What brought the global economy to its knees wasn't spending money. It was borrowing money you can't pay back.
Jealous much?
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
when basically every gadget now has one.
Sure, they look neat but that's about it.
And their prices are ridiculously high.
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
In the larger scheme of watches this isn't all that expensive. Take a look at what a Patek Philippe Sky Moon Toubillon or Vacheron Constantin Tour de l'Ile.
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
At least that's what I understand: glass in both sides
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
Also, it looks like there's a tiny sentinel trapped in the middle portion of the face.
07/09/09
07/09/09