<![CDATA[Gizmodo: x]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: x]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/x http://gizmodo.com/tag/x <![CDATA[Handbrake DVD Ripper Just Went 64-Bit]]> Handbrake just updated to 0.9.4 which uses x264 libraries to encode faster and smaller file sizes. On my iMac Core i7 a DVD ripped 25% faster. It also has better xbox and ps3 presets, among other things. It depends on a now unavailable 64-bit version of VLC but you can still download the nightly builds here. [Handbrake]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5413019&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Almost Nobody Owns Just Macs]]> NPD's Household Penetration Study found a 3% uptick in Mac households for 2009. This makes sense! What's surprising (or not) is that of the 12% of homes with a Mac, less than 2% are Mac-exclusive.

The 2% figure is extrapolated from NPD's less direct assessment:

[A]pproximately 12 percent of all U.S. computer owning households own an Apple computer, up from 9 percent in 2008. While Apple ownership is growing, those households are decidedly in favor of mixed system environments. Of those 12 percent, nearly 85 percent also own a Windows-based PC.

At first glance, these stats almost seem wrong, but when you start think about it, they make sense: The survey polled "households," which, on account of grandma's Compaq or your roommate's gaming PC, clobbers the exclusivity figure. (I live in what any reasonable person would call a "Mac household"—three people who use Macs almost exclusively—but that little Acer netbook sitting on the table means we're not.)

Plus, PCs are cheap and they linger, and Macs, being pricier, tend to find their way into richer households, where more than one computer is almost a given. That, combined the fact that most Macs sold are laptops, and therefore a little more likely to be a supplemental computer, makes the 2% figure look a little less crazy, but still, 2%? Fanboys, you're slacking. [NPD via Macrumors]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5374499&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[AMD Unveils World's First DirectX 11 Graphics Processor, Takes It for a Spin in Public]]> AMD demoed their buzzed-about DirectX 11 graphics processor at the Computex show in Taiwan, offering proof that they're making progress in getting to market first with their product.

Engadget says details are scant, but mention that AMD says that new DX11 features, such as the Compute Shader, will help improve Windows 7 performance, among other things. They expect their DirectX 11 products to be available in late 2009. [AMD via Engadget]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5276696&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[New Mac OS X Snow Leopard Beta Released, Run to the Torrents]]> A new version of Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard—labeled 10A335—has hit developers. Apple hasn't mentioned any new features or bug fixes, however. The Server version—which was released alongside—does come with an easier to use version of Podcast Producer, new spam mail filters in Mail Server, and other niceties.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5226249&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Leaked OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard Screenshot Shows 32-bit Mode]]> Sevenmac Magazin got themselves some screenshots of Apple's new OS X update, Snow Leopard, and it looks like apps with 32-bit modules will need to run in 32-bit mode even if they are 64-bit.

We know that Snow Leopard isn't going to be any kind of massive overhaul, but more of a refinement of the existing OS. It's aiming for stability, speed, and power management.

All the other screenshots that Sevenmac have just look to be proving that they actually have a working version of Snow Leopard. This one, though, is definitely weird. You have to restart the preference app in 32-bit mode in order to access the Network preference pane? Is it because this developer version only has the 32-bit version of the Network PP done? Is that going to be a recurring issue, that 64-bit apps that have to somehow work with 32-bit code needs to start/restart in compatibility mode? It would be super annoying if the OS doesn't handle it transparently, so this has us scratching our heads.

It is, though, probably a side-effect of Snow Leopard's tighter 64-bit compatibility. For more on that, and why 64-bit is going to make 10.6 cool, head over here to Giz Explains.

Sevenmac has a bunch of other pictures over here. [Sevenmac]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5119136&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Shady Organization Behind Psystar, Apple Claims]]> In a new turn of events after the judge dismissed Psystar's anti-trust claims, Apple is now on the offensive, accusing them of being associated with a group of shady John Does breaking the law:

18. On information and belief, persons other than Psystar are involved in Psystar’s unlawful and improper activities described in this Amended Complaint. The true names or capacities, whether individual, corporate, or otherwise, of these persons are unknown to Apple. Consequently they are referred to herein as John Does 1 through 10 (collectively the “John Doe Defendants”). On information and belief, the John Doe Defendants are various individuals and/or corporations who have infringed Apple’s intellectual property rights, breached or induced the breach of Apple’s license agreements and violated state and common law unfair competition laws. Apple will seek leave to amend this complaint to show the unknown John Doe Defendants’ true names and capacities when they are ascertained.

In other words: There's somebody else behind Psystar. Someone who is worth prosecuting by Apple's mighty lawyers. Groklaw says that this is important because it may explain why Psystar has been ignoring Apple and continue to boldly sell their crappy PCs running Hackintosh, a hacked Mac OS X version that runs in generic Intel hardware.

Apple is also asking for a preliminary injunction against all Psystar activities related to Mac OS X. Groklaw speculates that the people and corporations behind Psystar may be important and that, when Apple finally identifies them, they will obliterate them. [Groklaw via MacRumors]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5101968&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Giant iPhone Display Runs OS X (This Time, At Least)]]> Eagle-eyed reader Phelipe Hamoui snapped these shots of the giant iPhone display in Hong Kong running Mac OS X. This marks a nice change from that embarrassing little slip-up that revealed a U.S. display was running (gasp upon gasp!) Windows XP. So take a deep breath, Mac Army. Everything's gonna be okay. [- Thanks, Phelipe!]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5059066&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Adobe Knew of Vista PWN 2 OWN Hack All Along]]> The PWN 2OWN contest, as we all know, saw the Mac OS X weed crumble first, with Vista following soon after. Ubuntu was the only OS that was impenetrable to attack, but news is surfacing that Vista should have had a longer lifeline, if only Adobe had patched the flaw they knew about all along.


Yup, it's true; Adobe not only knew about the security flaw that Shane Macaulay used to hack Vista, they even had a patched prepared. Only thing is, they hadn't got round to releasing it. In fact, the patch was scheduled for release in the next Flash Player update later in the month.

Thankfully, Adobe were not in the dark about the security risk, however, if they were in the know, don't you guys think they have a responsibility to release the fix ASAP? Putting our systems at unnecessary risk due to our choice to support third party software just doesn't seem fair. Further, asking for system stability and security to be made a priority should be a given at all times, or so we reckon. Worse still, the defect may have cost Vista the title of impenetrable OS, and that's gonna hurt the MS fanboys dearly. After all, imagine if OS X had been the only hacked operating system; we think said fanboys may have had something to brag about, or at least a reason to punch Mr Smug Mac in his face. [Ars Technica]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=376585&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Mac OS X Leopard 10.5.2 Test Builds Seeded to Developers]]> After all the gushing about Mac OS X Leopard has died down, now it's time for some reality, namely, bug fixes in the form of OS X 10.5.2. According to Apple Insider, test builds of this update were seeded to developers, and that distribution included a 76-item list of fixes and code corrections thus far.

Top of the list were fixes to Apple's Common UNIX printing system (CUPS), in both its network and AirPort implementations. Fixes are also in the offing for mail flags and fonts in the Mail application and also the way Mail interacts with iCal.

According to Apple Insider, the company also wants those developers to carefully test 37 of the components of OS X:

Among them were Data Detectors, the Mac OS X Dock, the Finder, grammar checking, iCal, iChat, Mail, Parental Controls, Quick Look, Rosetta, Safari, Time Machine, and Leopard's 802.11 AirPort implementation (which has troubled some MacBook users.)
Rumor has the update to be rolling out in early 2008, maybe just in time for the MacWorld Expo in mid-January. [Apple Insider]]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=336274&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Apple Hasn't Given Up on Time Machine AirPort Disk Support]]> If you kept up with our Mac OSX Leopard Liveblog, you might have heard that Apple pulled wireless Time Machine back-ups with AirPort disks at the last minute. If you were irritated by this development, good news may be on the horizon. According to an Appleinsider source, Apple is classifying the AirPort disk issue as a known issue. So if the rumors are true, engineers are looking into it and an upcoming maintenance update resolving the problem may be well on its way. [Appleinsider]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=317487&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[When Will You Pounce on the Leopard?]]> I'm curious about when everyone is going to upgrade to Mac OS 10.5, better know throughout the galaxy as Leopard. I mean, I'm excited about all the new features but if I screw up my Mac, I'm totally SOL. Do I rush in where angels fear to tread and all that? What are you going to do? (And yeah, it should be obvious that this one is for the Mac users, but I've provided a few token responses for you haters.)Photo credit:Max Waugh

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=313594&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Nintendo Patent Hints at Wii Portable]]> With the success of the Wii being primarily due to its motion sensing controls, it would seem pretty logical for Nintendo to try it out on their portable line up as well. And it looks like they might do just that with the discovery of an updated patent filing by the big N themselves that states

:

"A game system includes a housing to be held by a player. The housing incorporates an XY-axis acceleration sensor to detect an acceleration in an X-axis and Y-axis direction and a Z-axis contact switch to detect an acceleration in a Z-axis direction. These sensor and switch detect at least one of an amount (e.g. tilt amount, movement amount, impact amount or the like) and a direction (e.g. tilt direction, movement direction, impact direction or the like) of a change applied to the housing. A simulation program provides simulation such that a state of a game space is changed related to at least one of the amount and direction of the change applied to the housing."
Well if this is the next version of the DS I've got one big question. How on earth are you supposed to see the screen if you're going to be flaring all around? Riddle me that Nintendo.
[Technabob]]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=286606&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Open X Package Openers Now Cheaper, Still Great]]> ani_struggle.gifani_slide.gifani_tape2.gif
These awesome Open X package cutters we wrote about two years ago has a pretty steep price drop. No longer $10, it's now $4.95, and even come with free shipping if you buy 6. Never rip the inside of your mouth opening a package like an idiot again.

We're not sure why you'd buy 6 now that Christmas season is over, but these would probably make the BEST VALENTINES DAY GIFT EVER.

And if you believed that, we wish you good luck getting inside that box ever again.

Product Page [My OpenX]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=231874&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[BenQ FP93G X+ Gaming Monitor: 2ms Response Time, Half-Inch Bezel]]> Gamers might wet their pants with news that BenQ is about to release the FP93G X+, a 19-ich monitor with a speedy 2ms response time. Now, it's not the only LCD to reach this type of speed (nor is it even the first BenQ monitor to do so), but BenQ promises a number of enhancements to help gamers frag and/or mine for gold more efficiently. Something called Blast Processing Advanced Motion Accelerator speeds up the liquid crystal by fluctuating the voltage, thus attaining the desired response time. BenQ puts the performance on par with traditional CRT monitors.

Expect all the usual DVI and D-Sub connectors money can buy, which you can do sometime this month. Could make a good gift idea for the resident PC gamer in your life, provided it lives up to the hype.

Press Release [BenQ]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=218552&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Mac OS X Driver for Xbox 360 Controller]]> An enterprising Mac gamer (I thought they all dual booted to Windows?) created a USB driver for your Xbox 360 controllers to use on OS X. It's released under GPL, so if there are any problems you can go ahead and fix them yourself. Most things work, but there are still some items yet to be fixed:

  • I don't think settings are persistent
  • More settings, e.g. trigger deadzone, button remap
  • Force feedback may elongate effects
  • Force feedback (DirectInput-style interface) emulator may need more work
  • Preference pane currently only tests rumble motors, by creating a force feedback interface but then just using the Escape functionality
  • Driver needs to handle more possible errors.

Mac OS X Driver [Tattlebogle via Digg]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=175162&view=rss&microfeed=true