That's a pretty sweet looking phone, and some very nice specs, too. Shame they had to go and cheapen it with WinMo. You can throw all the pretty interfaces you want on it, but that's still just the OS equivalent of wood-grain veneer on cheap particle board. When you stress it, it'll show its quality.
@Beastage: Windows Mobile has strengths, but it has many more weaknesses. Most of these stem from a lack of cohesive standards. At the very basic level, extensive issues with color depth, screen solution and processor speeds create huge issues with app support, as well as cohesive user experience with the underlying OS. Couple that with issues of reliability of independant APIs and you have a recipe for trouble. Coding has been, and continues to be, a problematic issue for developers. In order to provide the broadest level of compatibility a developer needs to include so much bloat as to make the app unwieldy and prone to error. Furthermore, the lack of standardizationin on the WinMo/hardware level further complicate issues. In and of itself, WinMo does some neat things, but it gets stressed easily. More recent incarnations fare slightly better, but that's mostly due to having more memory and processor power thrown at it as opposed to being a more stable product. Whatever your feelings on the matter may be, as someone involved with app development, I can say that WinMo has proven to be far more trouble than it's worth. It has its niches (enterprise level scalability), but it's certainly not innately user or developer friendly. The fact that it needs a slick "skin" in order to feel good is a bad sign, and until MS irons out issues with hardware variances that require coders to study reams of manufacturer specs, it won't ever begin to rival the iPhone OS, Android or Symbian.
imagine that thing running the iPhone OS? Giz should run a poll...see how many people would enjoy a physical keyboard on the iPhone or am I the only one?
@Je_suis_un_revolutionnaire: no, its not often done on helicopters. Using the gas turbines for thrust takes away from available power to the shaft( for the blades). Even in the example you used, the Mil Mi-24, does not use jet thrust. Ever actually look at a Hind? See those large ports on the side? Those are exhaust ports...located on the side....
09/02/09
09/02/09
09/02/09
09/03/09
Also, slap till I faint? What are you, 12?
09/02/09
09/02/09
09/02/09
Thanks for the heads up. I'll stay away from all handicap parking spots in the tri-state area.
05/04/09
05/04/09
05/04/09
GET OFF MY LAWN YOU DAMN KIDS!
05/04/09
05/04/09
05/04/09
05/04/09
I don't see why they don't use the gas turbine's exhaust for thrust, rather than turning a turbo prop, though.
05/04/09
05/04/09
No its actually often done on helicopters. The russian ones have very prominent jets. Look at Mi 24 for example.
I think they want to keep this one "stealthy" lower its heat signature by using a prop, but thats just a guess.
05/04/09
05/04/09
05/04/09
05/04/09
05/04/09
05/04/09
It was bad ass. Loved both of them as a kid.
05/04/09
05/04/09