I got my dad the WD HD TV last Christmas, and he loves it. I love it because it just works right out of the box and plays every format I throw at it, yet it's simple enough for a 65 year old man who's afraid of the iPhone to use. I bought a 2 pack of seagate 2.5" external drives from Sams Club for 130 bucks back in January, and once a month I'll pop over to my folks house and swap out the drives, leaving him with fresh movies and tv episodes to watch. He loves to brag to his friends about how his kid is so sneaky, and gets him "Hollywood movies that are still in theaters."
He's happy, I'm happy, WD TV gets two thumbs up. #hdmediaplayers
@Cash907Censored: The WDTV is the first gen with out ethernet, this article is about the WDTV Live also know as WDTV 2. Its got eithernet and some other differences. #hdmediaplayers
@bigdave914:
Yeah, I'm aware of that thanks. Thanks to a recent firmware update, the only difference between the WD HD TV and the WD TV Live (version reviewed above) is the newer model has an ethernet port. #hdmediaplayers
Good article. I have been looking over this info for a while now and glad to see it collected.
i like the idea of the Patriot, BUT I just don't see them following up with sequential firmware updates like WD will do (and has done with the previous WD TV).
I LOVE the specs of the Popcorn Hour box, but at that price and size, I would go for a PS3.
For features, support, and price, I think I am going with the WD TV Live (as soon as it actually freaking shows back up in stock somewhere). #hdmediaplayers
Anyone got other screenshots? Damn, I want this. Video is something the iPod Touch absolutely blows at, to the point where I don't use video at all. I'd ditch my iPod Touch for this no problem.
@Thao: I'm assuming that with foreknowledge of the touch's codec compatibility, you mean the actual video performance. I call shenanigans, as any touch in good working order is very good at actually playing the video.
If you mean compatibility, perhaps you should check before buying next time.
When you mix a bunch of couple codecs, and a couple of containers. I know this is probably how Giz got the info, but just because it supports a codec, doesn't mean that it supports all the possible containers for that codec. Also what about audio codecs? will it decode HD audio or pass it through?
Your question makes no sense, and I'm convinced you have no idea what you're talking about.
MKV is THE container for almost any codec you can imagine. Therefore, because it supports MKV, it probably supports all the codecs that could be contained in said format.
"Also what about audio codecs? will it decode HD audio or pass it through"
for that cost, you may as well build your own semi-decent HTPC with a Blu-ray player... you'll end up with a system much more capable and upgradeable than this thing!
This thing looks very old skool. Just a big black box with a tiny LCD window. I am almost surprised that it isn't a pop-up-top-loader like a circa 80s VHS deck.
"(All of the MPEG codecs we talk about, btw, will have an associated layer, since the video section is only part of the full standard, which includes audio and other stuff. MPEG-1 Layer 3, you probably know, is MP3.) "
You've got the wrong terminology there buddy. Part 2 of the MPEG-1 specification is indeed for video and part 3 is for audio, but part 3 and layer 3 are not the same. The MPEG-1 Part 3 audio specification includes three layers of audio formats, layers 1, 2 and 3 â each one building upon the other. Thus, layer 3 includes all the elements of layers 1 and 2 plus some new stuff. This is actually a bit inefficient because of the layering, but it was ultimately decided to implement the specification in this manner to allow for the greatest compatibility. The OGG audio codec is actually very similar to MP3, just without the layer 1 and 2 compatibility â hence it is marginally better than MP3.
All the Blu-ray AVC, VC-1, and MPEG-2 codecs are wrapped inside MPEG-2 transport stream containers (.m2ts). The HDDVD VC-1 and AVC codes were wrapped inside .EVO containers.
11/06/09
11/06/09
He's happy, I'm happy, WD TV gets two thumbs up. #hdmediaplayers
11/06/09
11/06/09
Yeah, I'm aware of that thanks. Thanks to a recent firmware update, the only difference between the WD HD TV and the WD TV Live (version reviewed above) is the newer model has an ethernet port. #hdmediaplayers
11/05/09
i like the idea of the Patriot, BUT I just don't see them following up with sequential firmware updates like WD will do (and has done with the previous WD TV).
I LOVE the specs of the Popcorn Hour box, but at that price and size, I would go for a PS3.
For features, support, and price, I think I am going with the WD TV Live (as soon as it actually freaking shows back up in stock somewhere). #hdmediaplayers
11/05/09
11/05/09
06/13/09
Where do I sign up?
06/14/09
If you mean compatibility, perhaps you should check before buying next time.
01/09/09
When you mix a bunch of couple codecs, and a couple of containers. I know this is probably how Giz got the info, but just because it supports a codec, doesn't mean that it supports all the possible containers for that codec. Also what about audio codecs? will it decode HD audio or pass it through?
"DivX/XVid/WMV9/H.264/MKV" files
01/09/09
Your question makes no sense, and I'm convinced you have no idea what you're talking about.
MKV is THE container for almost any codec you can imagine. Therefore, because it supports MKV, it probably supports all the codecs that could be contained in said format.
"Also what about audio codecs? will it decode HD audio or pass it through"
Now you're just being facetious AND stupid.
01/09/09
01/09/09
01/09/09
01/09/09
It looks like it most certainly does.
01/09/09
01/09/09
01/09/09
01/09/09
if only my PS3 could do this...
01/09/09
11/20/08
You've got the wrong terminology there buddy. Part 2 of the MPEG-1 specification is indeed for video and part 3 is for audio, but part 3 and layer 3 are not the same. The MPEG-1 Part 3 audio specification includes three layers of audio formats, layers 1, 2 and 3 â each one building upon the other. Thus, layer 3 includes all the elements of layers 1 and 2 plus some new stuff. This is actually a bit inefficient because of the layering, but it was ultimately decided to implement the specification in this manner to allow for the greatest compatibility. The OGG audio codec is actually very similar to MP3, just without the layer 1 and 2 compatibility â hence it is marginally better than MP3.
11/20/08
11/20/08
11/20/08
11/20/08
11/20/08
11/20/08
Pretty Cool
Poetically Curvacious
Perfectly Capable
Perversely Corrupt
Pleasant Company
I could go on but I'm sure you've heard, or read enough already.... ;)
11/20/08
11/20/08