Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
@Alduron: First, they have to write all possible Giz Explains Quantum Computing articles, then it's a simple matter of sorting through the results for the best one. It's possible they're not sorting at the speed of light though, which would explain the delay.
@ideaman2020: I'm gonna feel like such an idiot in 20 years when quantum computing just makes sense to college kids and I'm still thinking in 1s and 0s.
I'm guessing quantum debugging won't be any harder for them than current debugging is for us.
that's why i've been putting off learning programming theory. i can knock out some python here and there, but the inner workings of a microprocessor are still mysteriously magical to me.
@32ndnote: Yep, but at least it seems like the future now.
With all the failed promises of flying cars and sky cities I grew up with for the last 20 years its nice to see some stuff that actually seems like science fiction becoming reality.
The last 20 years or so brought improvements in many different fields but for the most part it was just an extension of technology that was around for those 20 years. The internet evolved from RBS systems to facebook but it was still just an evolution. Same with cars, computers, etc. The closest thing (IMO) that we got was they kinda modeled flip phones after ST communicators (which even cellphone technology, while getting smaller and cheaper was still just steps). Now there are actual revolutions. Completely changing how computers work like this. Completely changing the tools we use to perceive reality.
It just seemed like (again, to me) while the last 20 years brought improvements its only been the last 5 (or maybe even 2 or 3) that have brought actual revolutions which to me seem like the "future".
yep. what is the ipod but a futuristic walkman? what is my HDTV... besides just being a better TV? and incrementally better at that - from the time TV came out until what, 10 years ago, it was all 240x320. and it took us 60 years to get that up to 1900 x 1080? and still 720 is far from being ubiquitous? so really what we see is that it took us 60 years to make our TVs ~2.5x more detailed.
i think what happened is there were all these leaps and bounds in the early 20th century that drew an overly optimistic projected curve of progress. people had lives that went from horses and steam trains to the model T and television, human flight. If you were born in 1890, and managed to live until 1970, you saw it all, from horses to walking on the fucking moon, in a mere 80 years time. you would HAVE to imagine that in another 40 after that we'd be way ahead of where we are now.
so no flying cars, no civilian space flight, no holographic projectors, no full immersion virtual reality, no auto-dry jacket or self-lacing nikes. no new energy sources really. no fundamentally new, unprecedented technologies.
there're some exceptions, but they're highly singular - for example i believe someone achieved a faster than light transmission of data utilizing quantum entanglement. we've done single particle teleportation. quantum computing is making some moves. materials science has made some major improvements as well. but all in all, it's just been getting cheaper - that's the real profit of this whole last half century, is that it's gotten cheaper.
OK, firstly, suing for a million dollars for only $200+ worth of hardware is ridiculous.
But secondly, I have to echo some others about expecting some sort of safety for belongings that are checked in. If I plan a long-term stay overseas or wherever I'm taking a flight to, I may have enough valuables that I couldn't carry them all into the cabin anyway.
Also, some airlines have taken some other measures regarding check-in and carry-on luggage. Spirit Airlines, for example, will randomly select carry-on luggage to put in as check-in luggage. This is particularly bothersome because, more often than not, those bags will not be locked.
It hasn't happened to me yet, but I've had several friends find their luggage to be missing clothes, shoes, and even electronic equipment. Yes, people should know better than to let anything of value out of arm's reach on a trip, but how freakin sad is it that airlines can't be trusted with your baggage?
With as much as they charge for a ticket you'd think they could at least not steal things from you.
@TheGeoff: It's not always the airline, sometimes it's the TSA employees that scan your luggage... That's the hard part really, figuring out who did it.
@Lite's Posse: Is on Broadway: Amazing how on one side of the airport we're monitored for every move we make, but on the other side, there's no care in the world to keep an eye on things. Go homeland security!!
I'm sorry, i have no compassion for the airlines. One unnecessary headache after another, idiot employees, absolute ripoff. Good for you, Yale kid, sue their fucking faces off.
06/29/09
Just as soon as you guys understand it?
06/29/09
06/29/09
06/29/09
A: You don't.
06/29/09
But quantum debugging is a bitch...
06/29/09
I'm guessing quantum debugging won't be any harder for them than current debugging is for us.
06/29/09
that's why i've been putting off learning programming theory. i can knock out some python here and there, but the inner workings of a microprocessor are still mysteriously magical to me.
06/29/09
06/29/09
With all the failed promises of flying cars and sky cities I grew up with for the last 20 years its nice to see some stuff that actually seems like science fiction becoming reality.
06/29/09
06/29/09
The last 20 years or so brought improvements in many different fields but for the most part it was just an extension of technology that was around for those 20 years. The internet evolved from RBS systems to facebook but it was still just an evolution. Same with cars, computers, etc. The closest thing (IMO) that we got was they kinda modeled flip phones after ST communicators (which even cellphone technology, while getting smaller and cheaper was still just steps). Now there are actual revolutions. Completely changing how computers work like this. Completely changing the tools we use to perceive reality.
It just seemed like (again, to me) while the last 20 years brought improvements its only been the last 5 (or maybe even 2 or 3) that have brought actual revolutions which to me seem like the "future".
06/29/09
yep. what is the ipod but a futuristic walkman? what is my HDTV... besides just being a better TV? and incrementally better at that - from the time TV came out until what, 10 years ago, it was all 240x320. and it took us 60 years to get that up to 1900 x 1080? and still 720 is far from being ubiquitous? so really what we see is that it took us 60 years to make our TVs ~2.5x more detailed.
i think what happened is there were all these leaps and bounds in the early 20th century that drew an overly optimistic projected curve of progress. people had lives that went from horses and steam trains to the model T and television, human flight. If you were born in 1890, and managed to live until 1970, you saw it all, from horses to walking on the fucking moon, in a mere 80 years time. you would HAVE to imagine that in another 40 after that we'd be way ahead of where we are now.
so no flying cars, no civilian space flight, no holographic projectors, no full immersion virtual reality, no auto-dry jacket or self-lacing nikes. no new energy sources really. no fundamentally new, unprecedented technologies.
there're some exceptions, but they're highly singular - for example i believe someone achieved a faster than light transmission of data utilizing quantum entanglement. we've done single particle teleportation. quantum computing is making some moves. materials science has made some major improvements as well. but all in all, it's just been getting cheaper - that's the real profit of this whole last half century, is that it's gotten cheaper.
03/11/09
But secondly, I have to echo some others about expecting some sort of safety for belongings that are checked in. If I plan a long-term stay overseas or wherever I'm taking a flight to, I may have enough valuables that I couldn't carry them all into the cabin anyway.
Also, some airlines have taken some other measures regarding check-in and carry-on luggage. Spirit Airlines, for example, will randomly select carry-on luggage to put in as check-in luggage. This is particularly bothersome because, more often than not, those bags will not be locked.
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/12/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
With as much as they charge for a ticket you'd think they could at least not steal things from you.
03/11/09
03/12/09
03/11/09
03/11/09