<![CDATA[Gizmodo: zink]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: zink]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/zink http://gizmodo.com/tag/zink <![CDATA[Dell Wasabi First Inkless Pocket Printer That's Not Hideous]]> Zink's inkless pocket photo printers aren't new tech, but before Dell's Wasabi rendition, they were drag, ugly boxes, not deliberately designed modernist rectangles. They're $100 at the moment, though standard price will be $149. [Dell]

GALLERY




END

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5150842&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[This Is How the Japanese Want To Sell You a Tomy Xiao TIP-521 Photo-Printing Camera]]> Well, that is, if you're a scatologically inclined Japanese television viewer. What's that, Xiao-san? Squeezing my Zink sticker prints off at the pool? Arigato gozaimasu. [YouTube via Crunch Gear]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5104760&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Polaroid Bringing Back Classic 4x3 Insta-Prints With Forthcoming Digital Zink Cam]]> While the tears spilled mourning the death of Polaroid's instant film division are still somewhat damp, the company has a little spark of an announcement that could make hardcore 'roiders (of the best kind) happy—the company looks like it's finally getting serious about building its Zink instant digital printing tech into a camera. And it won't use the diminutive 2 x 3 inch format currrently spit out by the PoGo printer, which is the only product that currently features Zink tech. Instead, the new camera is planning to use the classic 4x3 vertical rectangle size, which became the company's trademark. And they're even taking (or pretending to take) suggestions from the public on the camera's features.

Just drop by the Amateur Photographer site and fill out the form, rating which features are important. Not a whole ton of flexibility here, but it's a nice gesture.

Zink's dye crystals are built into the paper itself, so there's no need for the white chemical pack/label area/shaking handle of the classics, but let's hope they keep that anyway, for old time's sake. I would encourage everyone to vote for that, as a write-in.

We've already seen a prototype camera packing Polaroid's Zink instant digital printing tech (at the 2x3 size), which is still apparently going to ship, someday. The new 4x3 cam is scheduled for "sometime in 2009." [Amateur Photography via Gadget Lab - Image: mocvdleung]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5036267&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Lightning Review: Polaroid PoGo Wireless Mobile Printer]]> The Gadget: The Polaroid PoGo, an inkless printer that prints 2” x 3” sticker pictures from digital cameras via USB and cellphones over Bluetooth.

The Price: $150 for the unit, 30-packs of photo paper cost $10.

The Verdict: Though, like you, I wasn't totally sure about the PoGo, after using it, I was surprised at how promising and unique the little gadget is. It solves the biggest problem with taking pictures on cellphones, the fact that you can't look at them anywhere besides your phone. The credit-card size prints look decent enough for what they are (though in Wilson's expert opinion, they're still “lousy”). It prints using Zink, an inkless technology that uses photo paper with billions of colorless dye crystals in CMY layers that change color when activated by heat. This means that the pictures are dry as soon as they develop, and you NEVER replace ink or toner cartridges. The prints are also waterproof, tear and fade resistant, and have an adhesive backing so you can stick them anywhere.

Another great thing about the PoGo is its portability. Its a little larger than a deck of cards, so if you've got pockets, you can take it around. It also connects to phones via Bluetooth so you don't have to worry about cords. We easily paired it via Bluetooth connection to a year-old, mainstream LG phone from Verizon, though it isn't compatible with every phonePolaroid says it works with about 70% of Bluetooth-enabled phones out today. I asked them about iPhone compatibility—they said not this one.

There are a few things holding me back from totally loving the PoGo. First of all, it's slow. The process from phone to picture took 60-75 seconds, which makes printing in the moment a little less exciting. Secondly, the Li-ion battery only lasts for 15 prints, and takes two hours to charge back up. It can print while it's charging which is nice, but that really takes away from the mobility factor.

Finally, I'm not sure I would use this on a long-term basis. The product guys said to use it in a bar to pick up ladies, but I don't know how many ladies would want stickers of me—at least, not right away. It seems like a fun fad, but when I showed it to Wilson, he couldn't wait to print pictures of his baby. High school kids, too, could probably find ongoing use for its sticker prints. There may be a wider appeal, even if I'm not the target demo.

The PoGo is a fun toy for now, and with a few tweaks and improvements, it could bring practicality and excitement back to printed pictures for a guy like me. [PoGo]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5013248&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Polaroid Cellphone Printer Uses Zink Tech]]> Zink's zero-ink technology was developed in Polaroid labs, so its nice seeing the tech making it back to its home marquee. More on Zink's cellphone printer and camera with the printer built in, here.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=337520&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[First Look: Zink Camera Has a Printer In Its Back]]> This rather large camera has a Zink based printer tucked inside. Can you say Polaroid awesomeness?

I was a little taken aback by the 7mp's size, but I'm an elitist. And that 2.4 inch screen and 3x zoom seem competent enough. Someone out there will love this thing to pieces when it hits the market Q4 of this year.

Zink [Gizmodo]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=232964&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[First Hands On: The Zink Bluetooth Camphone Printer]]> The DEMO launch you can hold in your hand is the Zink cellphone photo printer. It uses dye embedded paper inside of a pocket-sized printer to do wallet sized prints. The competition? There isn't any.

The printer transfers by Bluetooth, images of up to (maybe beyond, 3MP), downscales them internally, and pushes out prints via a simple roller. The 2x3-inch, 300 DPI shots look fantastic.

Pricing on paper is approximately 20 cents on a on a 2x3. The printer's battery lasts 20 prints per charge, and juices by USB. The internal paper tray will hold 10. Prints take for about a minute to finish from send (video after the jump). Prints are water resistant and durable enough for wallet duty, which is appropriate for a print of this size. Not bad for $99 bucks. It'll be out later this year, and I predict it'll sell like hot cakes.


Zink [Gizmodo]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=232947&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Zink Pocket Printer: iPhone Companion?]]> Polaroid is not dead yet. Apparently it was only sleeping, but now its research labs have smelled the coffee and spun off Zink, a company whose first product will be a stand-alone printer that's about the size of a deck of cards. This one-button printer is designed to easily connect to a camera phone, and will cost less than a hundred bucks.

Looks like a perfect companion to the iPhone, and might just work pretty well with D.A.V.E., that Seagate pocket drive with Bluetooth and Wi-Fi we mentioned earlier.

iPhone Gadget Suite? [Scobleizer]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=232549&view=rss&microfeed=true