<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo, the gadget guide. So much in love with shiny new toys, it's unnatural.]]></description>
				    			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Warner Bros. to Offer DivX Downloads [DivX] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Warner_Bros2.jpg" width="494" height="277" style="display:block;float:none;" />Already the format of choice for, ahem, somewhat clandestine distribution of digital video files, DivX has now officially partnered with Warner Bros. to distribute video in the format. Sony <a href="http://gizmodo.com/343848/sony-pictures-television-to-offer-divx-movie-downloads">beat WB to the punch</a> by about 9 months, and we'll have to wait even longer for Warner to come around to HD DivX, which won't be ready until a September of next year. SD downloads are expected to become available this month. Full details follow.</p> <blockquote> <p>Warner Bros. Licenses Content for Distribution on DivX Certified(R) Consumer Electronics Devices</p> <p>Agreement Enables Retailers to Offer Premium Content in DivX(R) Format for Playback on Variety of Devices</p> <p>SAN DIEGO & LOS ANGELES &mdash;(Business Wire)&mdash; Oct 14, 2008 DivX, Inc. (NASDAQ:DIVX) and Warner Bros. Entertainment today announced an agreement that will enable online retailers to offer Warner Bros. titles in the high-quality DivX® standard definition format in October 2008 and high definition format in September 2009 for playback on DivX Certified® consumer electronics devices.</p> <p>The wide-ranging agreement covers all titles available for digital distribution in the Warner Bros. catalogue including current and back-catalogue major motion pictures and television programs. All titles offered in the DivX format are compatible with a variety of DivX Certified devices from major consumer electronics brands, including DVD players, Blu-ray devices, gaming consoles and more. The agreement allows retailers who sign additional agreements with DivX and Warner Bros. to offer Warner titles in the DivX digital media format.</p> <p>“Using the DivX secure format is in keeping with our overall digital distribution strategy,” said Jim Wuthrich, Senior Vice President, Warner Bros. Digital Distribution. “The visual quality, security and widespread interoperability of the DivX format offers an excellent means for consumers to enjoy Warner Bros.’ content whenever and wherever they desire.”</p> <p>“Warner Bros. offers an extremely compelling catalogue of premium, high-quality content enjoyed by consumers all over the world,” said Kevin Hell, CEO of DivX, Inc. “We’re very excited to work together to offer consumers premium content on any DivX device, from the PC to the living room and on the go.”</p> <p>For more information about DivX, visit www.divx.com. To learn more about Warner Bros. Entertainment visit www.warnerbros.com.</p> </blockquote> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063056/warner-bros-to-offer-divx-downloads]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063056/warner-bros-to-offer-divx-downloads]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ DivX ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Digital Video ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ video Downloads ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ VoD ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Warner Bros. ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Warner Brothers ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>John Mahoney</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5063056&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Asus Recalls Worm-Infested Eee PCs From Japan [Asus Eee Box B202] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/woormy.jpg" width="250" height="293" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"/>Asus has not so surprisingly decided to recall the<a href="http://gizmodo.com/394563/asus-eee-box-b202-our-first-look-plus-official-specs-only-300"> Eee Box B202</a> mini PCs<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5060600/asus-admits-that-a-virus-shipped-with-some-eee-box-mini-pcs"> infested with the W32/Usbalex worm</a> in Japan. The virus-y boxes are confined to the land of Gojira, since it was only on Eee PCs tailored for the Japanese market. The numbers in play are pretty sad, actually: Asus built a wimpy 4,500 boxes for Japan and only sold 300, so the damage is limited to a few unlucky saps, who will never buy Asus again. [<a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/10/14/asus-eee-box-virus-triggers">Inquirer</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063057/asus-recalls-worm+infested-eee-pcs-from-japan]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063057/asus-recalls-worm+infested-eee-pcs-from-japan]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ asus eee box b202 ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Asus ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Asustek ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ eee ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Eee PC ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Japan ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Virus ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:50:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>matt buchanan</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5063057&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Last Minute MacBook Rumors: Entire Glass Trackpad Is a Button, Pro Has TWO Graphics Cards, and More [Rumor] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/newmacbookpro1.jpg" width="494" height="468" style="display:block;float:none;" />John Gruber, who foretold the Oct. 14 event <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5048126/rumor-apple-macbook-event-on-oct-14">many moons ago</a>, has just dropped what appears to be <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2008/10/contains_spoilers">the motherload of what'll be announced</a>. Besides confirming <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5062954/spyshot-shows-what-looks-to-be-the-new-macbook-pro">the spy shot</a>, he confirms what I thought when I saw there wasn't a separate mouse button&mdash;the entire trackpad (which is glass, as <a href="http://blogs.computerworld.com/rumor_macbook_updates_to_include_glass_trackpad_other_goodies">was rumored</a>) is a button, kind of like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5060378/blackberry-storm-first-hands-on">the BlackBerry Storm's screen</a>. You just push it down, it clicks.</p> <p>Two bits on the Pro side: There isn't a new 17-inch model. Whether it'll show up later (like the original 17-inch MacBook Pro) or will fade into history is unknown, but the current one will hang around for a bit. The biggie, though, is that the Pro has TWO graphics cards&mdash;a GeForce 9400M and a 9600M GT. It'll use the 9400M when it needs to conserve battery juice, and kick on the 9600M when it needs raw power. CPU is going to be about the same. Oh, and it's go glossy or go home, there is no matte option.</p> <p>For the new MacBooks, they'll look just like 13-inch Pros, but they'll cost ya on that level too: The cheapest aluminum MacBook will be $1299, come with a 2GHz processor, 2GB RAM and 160GB HDD. Yeah, that CPU is a bit slower than the old one, but supposedly the GeForce 9400M inside will make up for it. The white MacBook will stick around, and drop to $999 for the base model.</p> <p>And for the Airs, more storage, 120GB HDD and 128GB SSD. Woohoo. Of course, we'll find out soon, as we <a href="http://live.gizmodo.com/">bring to you live</a>. [<a href="http://daringfireball.net/2008/10/contains_spoilers">Daring Fireball</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063055/last-minute-macbook-rumors-entire-glass-trackpad-is-a-button-pro-has-two-graphics-cards-and-more]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063055/last-minute-macbook-rumors-entire-glass-trackpad-is-a-button-pro-has-two-graphics-cards-and-more]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Rumor ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Apple ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MacBook ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Macbook 2008 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MacBook Air 2008 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Macbook event 2008 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MacBook Pro ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MacBook Pro 2008 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Macbook2008 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Macbookevent ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ New macbook ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Notebooks ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:36:02 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>matt buchanan</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5063055&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ How to Turn Off Apple Coverage [Announcements] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/noapples.jpg" width="494" height="329" style="display:block;float:none;" />The MacBook event today inexorably means Giz will be crammed full of Apple posts. It just one of those things, like gravity. But unlike gravity, you can do something about it! <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/not:apple">Clicking here</a> will take you to a wonderful land where Apple doesn't exist, unicorns roam free and Tom Cruise is our lord, savior and president. It works if you wanna ignore other stuff too, like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/not:Microsoft">Microsoft</a>, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/not:politics">politics</a> or <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/not:boobs">boobs</a>. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/not:Apple">Giz Without Apples</a>, <em>Photo: Flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/re-ality/58512144/">Re-ality</a></em>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062724/how-to-turn-off-apple-coverage]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062724/how-to-turn-off-apple-coverage]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Announcements ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Not Apple ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>matt buchanan</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062724&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Elmo Live Video Review (Verdict: Buy If You Love Your Children) [Elmo Live] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><script type="text/javascript"> newVideoPlayer("/elmointroduction_giz.flv", 476, 286,""); </script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/elmointroduction_giz.flv.jpg" style="display:block;display: none;" />Yesterday marked the arrival of Elmo Live, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/356488/first-video-of-elmo-live-singing-and-dancing-shows-he-got-skillz">rapping, dancing and storytelling animatronic doll</a> that'll be burning up retail this holiday season, Great Depression or not. We got one of the little guys, and thoroughly evaluated his MC skills, jokes and hugging ability. He's a fun little dude, at least for a short while. Watch this video review before you "decide" to succumb to the will of your kids and invest whatever cash you still have in Elmo Live.</p> <p>Elmo has four touch-sensitive spots&mdash;his foot, stomach, back and nose&mdash;and he does different things depending on where you press. Here's some of the funny things he does when you touch his nose, such as sneezing and playing the "got your nose" game:<script type="text/javascript"> newVideoPlayer("/elmonose_giz.flv", 476, 286,""); </script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/elmonose_giz.flv.jpg" style="display:block;display: none;" /></p> <p>The little red monster is at his animatronic best when he is telling a story: He sits, stands, opens his mouth and flails his arms all around. It's a shame he only has two stories to tell.<script type="text/javascript"> newVideoPlayer("/elmostories_giz.flv", 476, 286,""); </script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/elmostories_giz.flv.jpg" style="display:block;display: none;" /></p> <p>It's good to see that Elmo still raps, and his instant classic "Elmo's Gotta Get On Up" is as head-bobbing as ever&mdash;especially when he's wearing some bling from our personal collection. When you touch his back, he says all kinds of <s>creepy</s> lovable things like asking for hugs or to scratch his itch. In fact, Elmo can get downright clingy.<script type="text/javascript"> newVideoPlayer("/elmomore_giz.flv", 476, 286,""); </script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/elmomore_giz.flv.jpg" style="display:block;display: none;" /></p> <p>So is he worth the $60 list price&mdash;or more realistically, the hundreds of dollars you'll spend buying him on eBay when supplies run out? He's not as cuddly and interactive as previous Elmos; you mostly have to sit back after touching him and let him do his thing. Despite all that you see here, I actually grew bored of him fairly fast. Worst of all, as you can hear, his motors are as loud as his voice, which detracts from the fun in a big way.</p> <p>On the flipside, <a href="http://jezebel.com/5062776/tickle-me-elmo-less-interesting-to-little-girls-than-camera-time">most of the kids on Good Morning America</a> went nuts for the furball. I'm no Dr. Spock, but my theory is, if you love your kids and don't want them reliving their failed childhood in psychotherapy forty years from now, you really ought to buy this thing. [<a href="http://www.fisher-price.com/fp.aspx?st=8000&e=product&pid=44388&pcat=ss_stuff">Fisher-Price Elmo Live</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062947/elmo-live-video-review-verdict-buy-if-you-love-your-children]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062947/elmo-live-video-review-verdict-buy-if-you-love-your-children]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ elmo live ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ bigvid=true ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Christmas ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Clips ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Elmo ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Elmo live review ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ fisher price ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Holiday ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Kids ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Reviews ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Shopping ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Tickle Me Elmo ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ TMX Elmo ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Toys ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Video Review ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Benny Goldman</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062947&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 4.3 Inch WVGA Monitor Can Run on USB Juice Alone [Usb Displays] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/usbmonitor.jpg" width="494" height="318" style="display:block;float:none;" />Connecting monitors to computers via USB <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/clever-usb/19+inch-monitor-from-samsung-connects-to-your-pc-via-usb-302245.php">isn't really that exciting</a> anymore, but this little dreamboat from Century Japan does something much more than that: it runs on bus power. In other words, this thing is powered just like your trusty flash drives, mice and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5044138/usb-can+shaped-humidifier-mixes-weirdness-with-moisturising-power">soda can-shaped USB humidifiers</a>. A tiny, portable, fully functional secondary monitor would be extremely useful for mobile power users, and of interest to just about anyone with a spare USB port. Possibly an issue: I'm not sure that "extremely useful" quite translates to "worth $200." [<a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/13/mini-monitor-needs-only-usb/">OhGizmo</a> via <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/century-japan-lcd-4300u-43-inch-usb-monitor-1018916/">Slashgear</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063045/43-inch-wvga-monitor-can-run-on-usb-juice-alone]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063045/43-inch-wvga-monitor-can-run-on-usb-juice-alone]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Usb displays ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Century japan ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Display ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Displays ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Monitor ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Monitors ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ USB ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ usb display ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ USB monitor ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Usb monitors ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ wvga ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:56:59 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5063045&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Microsoft Responds to New MacBooks, Just Says "Apple Tax" Eight Times [Microsoft] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/macbookmico.jpg" width="494" height="322" style="display:block;float:none;" />In an email of talking points circulated by Microsoft spokespeople, the company addresses the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook">various rumors</a> about today's new MacBooks, preemptively claiming that they will be overpriced, underspec'd and locked down. They offer charts comparing the feature lists of similarly priced Windows and Mac notebooks and make numerous accusations of an "Apple Tax." The email is interesting: nothing they say is <em>incorrect</em>, but none of it is new. Most importantly, all of it misses the point completely.</p> <p>Most Apple buyers are fully aware that they could purchase a cheaper computers from another manufacturer &mdash; after all, Apple's hardware specifications aren't exactly closely guarded secrets. Telling them this again and again won't win any converts, but it <em>will,</em> in a way, "rally the base" of fervent Apple critics online and elsewhere. If you also take into consideration that fact that Microsoft isn't promoting a specific new competitor to the new MacBook or even saying many positive things about any of their products, it is pretty clear what this is: an old-fashioned attack ad.</p> <p>Unfortunately for Microsoft, it's doubtful that it will change anything. With or without these ads, new MacBooks will inspire a hoard of people &mdash; most of whom would have never purchased one anyway &mdash; to write about how overpriced the hardware is. Shouting "COMMODITIZED PCS ARE CHEAPER" over and over again and throwing around phrases like "Apple Tax" isn't a marketing strategy &mdash; it's political entrenchment. <em>For computers</em>. Partial text of the email below.</p> <blockquote> <p>The economy is impacting consumer choices, but Macs, due to their high upfront, won’t sell in a more conservative market. On Sept. 29th, Morgan Stanley noted: “PC unit growth is decelerating and the remaining source of growth is increasingly the sub-$1,000 market where Apple does not play.” Even if Apple were to drop pricing, the Apple Tax still prices Macs well outside of the sub-$1000 range.</p> <p>You can get a PC laptop with a bigger hard drive, more RAM, a media-card reader, more USB ports, and a bigger screen, for much less than a Mac. See the comparison chart below for just a few examples of what you can get today…we’ll send out an updated comparison chart after Apple’s announcement tomorrow.<br> You can upgrade just about any Windows desktop PC, but the only significantly upgradeable Mac is the Mac Pro listed at $2799.00.</p> <p>Repurchasing software to make your Mac do all the things your PC does will cost you hundreds of dollars. Buying a Mac means scrapping your software and buying new applications (for up to $1,100) that run on Mac, just to do what you can still easily do on a new PC with the applications you already have. We’ve listed a set of common applications below.</p> <p>HDMI, Blu-Ray, eSATA, MediaCard Readers, built-in 3G, Fingerprint readers, TV Tuners, all have been shipping as built-in features on PCs for years, but none are available on a Mac. Not only does this mean you get to use the latest and greatest now, but since it’s so easy to upgrade PCs, it also means that your computer is more future-ready…you can get today’s technology now, and tomorrow’s technology the minute its available.</p> </blockquote> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063041/microsoft-responds-to-new-macbooks-just-says-apple-tax-eight-times]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063041/microsoft-responds-to-new-macbooks-just-says-apple-tax-eight-times]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Microsoft ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Apple ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Apple tax ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Mac ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MacBook ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MacBooks ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Marketing ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:14:24 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5063041&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Pantech Matrix Dual Sliding Phone Has More Buttons Than Sense [Pantech Matrix] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/pantech.jpg" width="494" height="403" style="display:block;float:none;" />Formed from the same genetic ooze as Pantech's Slide Duo smartphone and rebranded Helio Ocean handset, the Matrix is a mildly frustrating device: spec'd with the best, but dressed in the worst. An HSDPA-enabled handset with GPS, a full QWERTY keyboard in addition to a dialpad, and two cameras should have the software to leverage the hardware, but AT&T and Pantech have chosen to stick with an in-house OS rather than opt for Windows Mobile as they did with the Duo QWERTY smartphone. Still, it doesn't look like a bad feature phone for people who message more than they talk, and it's available today at AT&T stores. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10065270-1.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=Crave">Crave</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063037/pantech-matrix-dual-sliding-phone-has-more-buttons-than-sense]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063037/pantech-matrix-dual-sliding-phone-has-more-buttons-than-sense]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Pantech matrix ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ At&t ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Duo ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Helio ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Helio ocean ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Ocean ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Pantech ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ pantech duo ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Pantech slide duo ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Windows Mobile ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Winmo ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:30:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5063037&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Richard Garriott Arrives at ISS, Reportedly Ready to Fix the Toilet [Geeks In Space] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/_45105905_7eb0c01b-5ce5-40e2-bbf3-86d4ce71a3cf.jpg" width="226" height="170" />The Soyuz TMA-13, carrying computer game rich guy, son of an astronaut, and current space tourist Richard Garriott has successfully docked with the International Space Station as of 8:26 GMT (3:26 EST). The three-man crew just finished <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5062309/richard-garriott-reaches-orbit-can-finally-act-out-plot-of-tabula-rasa">floating around in orbit</a> for a few days, and are now commencing their scheduled missions. For the two astronauts, that means spending six months building new life support equipment for future crews; for Garriott, that means ten days of floating around, giggling and getting sick on piles of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeze-dried_ice_cream">freeze-dried Neapolitan ice cream</a>.</p> <p>He'll also be carrying out some scientific duties, photographing the earth's surface to compare to pictures taken nearly 40 years ago by his father. Whether they'll be able to fix their most pressing problem &mdash; a broken toilet &mdash; will be apparent in a few days. Garriott's crew will be installing a second facility and repairing the first, which has performed sporadically over the last few months. It remains to be seen whether or not game design skills transfer to zero-gravity toilet repair, but if not the results could be <em>spectacular</em>. [<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7668965.stm">BBC</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063033/richard-garriott-arrives-at-iss-reportedly-ready-to-fix-the-toilet]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063033/richard-garriott-arrives-at-iss-reportedly-ready-to-fix-the-toilet]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Geeks In Space ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ astronauts ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Cosmonauts ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Garriott ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ ISS ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Nasa ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ richard garriott ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ soyuz ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Space ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Toilets ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:59:27 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5063033&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Quantenna Chips Boosts Wi-Fi Coverage In Every Corner Of Your Castle [Wi-Fi] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/bighousewireless.jpg" width="494" height="276" style="display:block;float:none;" /> My parents live in a pretty big house&mdash;well, at least it <i>seems</i> big if you've spent the last five years living in various closets in New York. One of the most annoying things about occasionally blogging from there is that sometimes, depending on where you are in the big house, the wireless connection will crap out inexplicably. Luckily for them, a California startup called Quantenna Communications is trying to solve that problem with chipsets that boost Wi-Fi signals and evens out wireless coverage.</p> <p>The chips&mdash;a 2.4 Ghz band, a 5 Ghz band, and a dual-band—can be plugged into walls and use MIMO technology to amplify signals from an existing network. Quantenna is hoping to sell the single-band chips for $20 and the dual-band chip for $40. Chances are, if you live in a big house like my parents', that's not too high a price to pay for all over coverage. [<a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/10/13/wi-fi-gets-a-boost-with-quantenna-chips/">GigaOm</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063018/quantenna-chips-boosts-wi+fi-coverage-in-every-corner-of-your-castle]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063018/quantenna-chips-boosts-wi+fi-coverage-in-every-corner-of-your-castle]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Wi-Fi ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Internet ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Mimo ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MIMO technology ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Quantenna ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ signal booster ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Wireless ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Wireless coverage ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ wireless internet ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ wireless signal ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:30:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Elaine Chow</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5063018&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ New MacBook Pro 2008 Mock-Up Lights My Credit Card On Fire [Apple] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/macbook_pro_late_2008.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="774" height="572" style="display:block;float:none;" /></p> <div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript"> digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa'; digg_url = 'http://digg.com/apple/MacBook_Pro_Mockup_is_Stunning'; </script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"> </script></div> <p>Here's a crystal clear image of the new MacBook Pro 2008. At least, if you trust yesterday's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5062954/spyshot-shows-what-looks-to-be-the-new-macbook-pro">alleged spy shot</a>. I created it using that image as a guide for those of you too impatient to wait until <a href="http://live.gizmodo.com/">tomorrow's Apple event</a>, like myself. Just like it happened <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/poll/the-ipod-nano-mock+up-updated-oh-noes-probably-is-real-292295.php">with the iPod nano mockups</a>, let's hope this one is also right on the money. Why? Because 1) I love the design and 2) I'm in the market to buy a replacement for my aging PowerBook 17. I can't wait to get this 15-inch beauty.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063011/new-macbook-pro-2008-mock+up-lights-my-credit-card-on-fire]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063011/new-macbook-pro-2008-mock+up-lights-my-credit-card-on-fire]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Apple ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Macbook 2008 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MacBook Air 2008 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Macbook event 2008 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MacBook Pro 2008 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Macbook2008 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Macbookevent ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ New macbook ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Notebooks ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ The New MacBook Pro 2008 Mock-Up ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Top ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Verizonbestmodo ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:37:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5063011&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Newegg Offering 4GB MacBook RAM Upgrade For $45 [Dealzmodo] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/macbook4gbram.jpg" width="494" height="262" style="display:block;float:none;" /> Sure, the new MacBook's about to be revealed and that's super exciting, but some of us around here are actually starting to feel the effects of the recession and could sure use a good deal right now. For you belt-tighteners, here's a cheap and quick upgrade from Newegg. The online retailer's offering a Corsair 4GB DDR2 kit (two sticks of 2GB RAM) for Apple notebooks for $45 after a $40 mail-in rebate. Get it quick though, the deal ends tomorrow, October 15th. [<a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820233066">Newegg</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063008/newegg-offering-4gb-macbook-ram-upgrade-for-45]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063008/newegg-offering-4gb-macbook-ram-upgrade-for-45]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Dealzmodo ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ 2Gb ram ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ 4Gb ddr2 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Apple ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Apple notebook ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Laptops ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MacBook ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Newegg ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Notebooks ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Online Shopping ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ RAM upgrade ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:15:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Elaine Chow</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5063008&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Samsung Releasing Laptops Into the U.S. of A. [Coming To America] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/samsunginamerica.jpg" width="494" height="339" style="display:block;float:none;" /> Years after selling notebooks in Asia and Europe, Samsung has finally braved the jump to the U.S. market. The company will be releasing five different notebook lines to North America, including its pretty little <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5048475/samsung-netbook-looks-cute-in-glamor-shots">10-inch netbook for $499</a> and the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5043396/video-hands+on-samsung-x360-is-an-air-killer">super skinny X360</a> starting at $1,599. Other lines include their Q-series all-purpose notebooks, their R-series desktop replacements and the business focused, rugged P-series. Ha! We knew you couldn't stay away, Samsung. [<a href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/were-coming-to-america-samsung-finally-enters-us-notebook-market">Laptop Mag</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063004/samsung-releasing-laptops-into-the-us-of-a]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063004/samsung-releasing-laptops-into-the-us-of-a]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Coming to America ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Europe ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Korea ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Laptops ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Notebooks ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Samsung ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Samsung laptops ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Samsung N10 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Samsung X360 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Usa ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:45:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Elaine Chow</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5063004&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Apple's $899 Product Might Be LED Display Rather Than Ultra-Cheap MacBook [Rumor] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/index_top20071026.jpg" style="display:block;" /> Earlier this evening, something with the proposed price of $899 appeared on Apple's product lists, causing certain parts of the internet to cry out that perhaps a low-end MacBook was in the works. Now, according to <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/10/14/apples-new-899-product-is-an-led-display-and-not-a-macbook/">Macrumors</a> and <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/10/13/new_photo_reveals_macbook_pro_with_black_display_bezel.html">AppleInsider</a>, it looks like the item will most likely be a <b>24-inch LED Apple Cinema Display</b>, rather than a cheap lappie. I guess all will be revealed <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5062706/apples-brickbook-macbook-event-10-am-pst-october-14">come 10am PST</a>. [<a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/10/14/apples-new-899-product-is-an-led-display-and-not-a-macbook/">Macrumors</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063003/apples-899-product-might-be-led-display-rather-than-ultra+cheap-macbook]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5063003/apples-899-product-might-be-led-display-rather-than-ultra+cheap-macbook]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Rumor ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Apple ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Apple Event ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Apple LED display ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Apple monitor ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ LED monitor ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MacBook ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MacBook Pro ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:21:14 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Elaine Chow</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5063003&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Sirius Coming Out With New Satellite Radio Boombox [Sirius XM] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/sirius-boombox1.jpg" width="494" height="189" style="display:block;float:none;" /><br> For those of you aspiring to be the next Satellite Radio Raheem, here's a few newly leaked photos of the upcoming Sirius SUB-X2 Boombox. Much like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/portable-media/sirius-kind+of-universal-boombox-186783.php">current SUB-X1</a>, the new music player will sport a front-panel headphone jack, auxiliary input for other MP3 players, and a universal docking system. I wonder if that docking system will support XM radios as well, now that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5030621/sirius-and-xm-officially-married-now-sirus-xm-radio">they're married</a> and all. Prices and more detailed specs have yet to be announced, though it shouldn't cost you too much more than its last iteration.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/sirius-boombox2.jpg" width="494" height="188" style="display:block;float:none;" /><br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/sirius-boombox3.jpg" width="494" height="237" style="display:block;float:none;" /></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062965/sirius-coming-out-with-new-satellite-radio-boombox]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062965/sirius-coming-out-with-new-satellite-radio-boombox]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Sirius XM ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Boombox ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MP3 Player ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Music player ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Radio ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Satellite Radio ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Sirius ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Sirius Universal Boombox ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Sub-x1 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Sub-x2 ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:30:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Elaine Chow</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062965&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Flip Mino Now Available With Fully Customized Paintjob [Flip] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/flipminops.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="452" height="303" style="display:block;float:none;" /><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5012826/flip-mino-a-smaller-better-flip-camcorder-for-180">Flip Mino</a>, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5013420/the-ultimate-cheap-camcorder-battlemodo">one of the best cheap camcorders</a> money can buy, can now be personalized to your heart's delight. The new Flip site allows you to choose from hundreds of pre-made designs, upload your own image, or make a one-of-a-kind pattern using their awesomely trippy pattern generator to be printed on the camera's shell. Better still, you can share your designs with the Flip community, and any camera sold with your image will score you $10. If you're the giving kind, you can donate the proceeds to charity as well. But times are tough, and after dropping $180 on the Mino, your beer money fund looks like a worthy cause. [<a href="http://www.theflip.com/">Flip</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062952/flip-mino-now-available-with-fully-customized-paintjob]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062952/flip-mino-now-available-with-fully-customized-paintjob]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Flip ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Camcorders ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Cheap camcorders ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ flip mino ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Flip mino-p ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ personalized ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ skinit ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:01:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Benny Goldman</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062952&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ New MacBook 2008 Event Bingo: Play and Win Free Pizza [Apple] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/macbook-bingo.png" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="625" height="855" style="display:block;float:none;" />The new MacBook 2008 line-up. Oh yes. At last, after all this endless waiting, we are just a few hours away from the <a href="http://live.gizmodo.com/">Apple MacBook 2008 event</a> in which His Steveness will show the new <i>wonderbooks</i> to the world. We have already told you <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5055082/apple-macbook-2008-event-all-the-rumors-in-one-place">what to expect</a>, but until tomorrow nobody really knows for sure. That's why we have created this bingo game, so you can play with us as you follow our <a href="http://live.gizmodo.com/">MacBook 2008 liveblog event</a>. You only have to print this and get it.</p> <p>• Print out the bingo card.<br> • Follow our <a href="http://live.gizmodo.com/">MacBook 2008 liveblog event</a> and take note of the timestamp as the event in the bingo card happens.<br> • You can shout bingo if you fill out one line or, alternatively, one of the 2 x 2 brick groups.<br> • When you get a bingo, quickly send us an email including the events and their timestamps to tips@gizmodo.com.</p> <p>The first person who sends us a bingo wins the prize, which—in case you are a girl—it will be a dinner for two with <i>me</i> at Good Enough to Eat or—if you are a boy—a dinner for two with Jason at his lair. OK, I just made that up. But you will get our respect and love. Tons of it.</p> <p>And <i>one free pizza</i> (if there's pizza internet ordering where you are located, that is). Nothing like an edible prize to warm up my heart and my stomach. In fact, we should make this a tradition for each event: The Giz's Liveblog Pizza Bingo. I like how it sounds.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062956/new-macbook-2008-event-bingo-play-and-win-free-pizza]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062956/new-macbook-2008-event-bingo-play-and-win-free-pizza]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Apple ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ free pizza ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Macbook 2008 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MacBook Air 2008 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Macbook event 2008 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MacBook Pro 2008 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Macbook2008 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Macbookevent ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ New macbook ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Notebooks ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ The New MacBook 2008 Liveblog Bingo ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Top ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Verizonbestmodo ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:25:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062956&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Spyshot Shows What Looks to Be The New MacBook Pro [Apple] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/newmacbookpro1.jpg" width="494" height="468" style="display:block;float:none;" />As is always the case, this undercover iPhone pic of what appears to be the new MacBook Pro is too blurry to rule for sure one way or the other. But as far as spyshots go, this one's looking pretty solid. And just like with the presumed-fake-and-then-verified-true <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5046259/unconfirmed-an-actual-picture-of-the-new-ipod-nano">iPod nano leaked pics</a> from last time (coincidentally also sent in by our friend JR here), it matches what's been popping up in even more dubious pics over the last few weeks—a more rounded, piano-black bezel, MacBook Air-like keyboard and a large (although not glass) trackpad (and as many of you commenters have also asked, where is the trackpad button?). We'll know for sure <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5062706/apples-brickbook-macbook-event-10-am-pst-october-14">tomorrow at 10AM PST</a>—stay tuned until then. [<em>Thanks, JR!</em>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062954/spyshot-shows-what-looks-to-be-the-new-macbook-pro]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062954/spyshot-shows-what-looks-to-be-the-new-macbook-pro]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Apple ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ MacBook ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Macbook 2008 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Macbook event ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Macbook event 2008 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Macbook2008 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ New macbook pro ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Notebook ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Pro ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Top ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Verizonbestmodo ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:53:51 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>John Mahoney</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062954&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ FCC Says Free Wireless Plans Won't Screw Up T-Mobile's 3G [Free Wireless] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/fcc.GIF" width="250" height="250" /> Trying to add a silver lining to your undoubtedly dismal economic future, the FCC has struck down T-Mobile's complaints that the agency's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/393133/fcc-planning-new-spectrum-auction-with-free-broadband-for-all">scheme to offer free wireless to lower-income peoples</a> will interfere with established 3G networks. In an engineering report, the agency claimed that there would be no “significant risk of harmful interference.”</p> <p>That's a good thing should this plan, which would offer downstream speeds of 768kbps for free to half the U.S. within the first four years, and 95% in the next six, actually come to fruition. T-Mobile and its ilk have threatened to sue if the FCC's action impairs their ability to use the spectrums they purchased in any way. </p> <p>Will it ever be though? I mean, who does the FCC think is going to buy something with this many expensive restrictions on it in the first place? [<a href="http://www.mobile-tech-today.com/story.xhtml?story_id=62431">Mobile Tech Today</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062951/fcc-says-free-wireless-plans-wont-screw-up-t+mobiles-3g]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062951/fcc-says-free-wireless-plans-wont-screw-up-t+mobiles-3g]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ free wireless ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Fcc ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Federal Communications Commission ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Free broadband ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Government ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Kevin Martin ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Politics ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ spectrum auction ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ T-Mobile ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ wireless spectrum ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:52:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Elaine Chow</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062951&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ America's Biggest Universities Build 78-Terabyte Library, Still Missing Front Door [Digital Libraries] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Elephant_in_library.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="494" height="318" style="display:block;float:none;" />Today, 23 of the biggest public and private universities in California, Michigan, Virginia, Illinois and other states* announced a 2-million book online library made of 78 terabytes of information, 16 percent of which are free of copyright and ready for public consumption. Even though the press release says "public domain materials will be available for reading online," however, the search interface itself has yet to be constructed.</p> <p>The Hathi Trust&mdash;named in the spirit of wisdom, memory and strength after the Hindu word for "elephant"&mdash;will be an amazing repository of data. Currently its bibliography, containing the physical equivalent of 1,703 tons of literature, is only partially searchable by <a href="http://mirlyn.lib.umich.edu/F/?local_base=mbooks">University of Michigan</a> and <a href="http://lens.lib.uchicago.edu/">University of Chicago</a> library sites, but "there is currently no single global interface to the body of content in HathiTrust repository."</p> <p>This highlights the real strains of safely storing the world's intellectual property&mdash;while being able to serve it up for public consumption. The Hathi website laments that it's still working on "a way that takes into account the large number of different sources of metadata and the different strategies each of the partners has for managing that information." It's the reason that library science can be as complex as rocket science. To put it another way, "Growing the world's largest library won’t happen overnight." [<a href="http://www.hathitrust.org/press">Hathi Trust</a> via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/10/universities-la.html">Wired</a>]</p> <p><i>*Here's the whole list, in case you want to see if your uni is part of the elephantine operation:<br> Indiana University<br> Michigan State University<br> Northwestern University<br> The Ohio State University<br> Penn State University<br> Purdue University<br> University of California Berkeley<br> University of California Davis<br> University of California Irvine<br> University of California Los Angeles<br> University of California Merced<br> University of California Riverside<br> University of California San Diego<br> University of California San Francisco<br> University of California Santa Barbara<br> University of California Santa Cruz<br> The University of Chicago<br> University of Illinois<br> University of Illinois at Chicago<br> The University of Iowa<br> University of Michigan<br> University of Minnesota<br> University of Wisconsin-Madison<br> University of Virginia</i></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062945/americas-biggest-universities-build-78+terabyte-library-still-missing-front-door]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062945/americas-biggest-universities-build-78+terabyte-library-still-missing-front-door]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Digital libraries ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Books ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Hathi trust ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Library ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Library Science ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Literature ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Research ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:30:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062945&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Microsoft NXE Deal Upgrades Your Xbox 360 Memory For Less [Dealzmodo] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/360hdbigger.jpg" style="display:block;" /> Afraid your <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5061077/the-new-xbox-experience-requires-256mb-storage-card-minimum">Xbox doesn't have enough memory</a> for the New Xbox Experience? So is Microsoft, and they're willing to sell you the storage space you need for a much reduced price. You can now log on to the company's <a href="http://www.xbox.com/en-US/support/hardware/memoryupdate/default.htm">Xbox site</a> to see if you're eligible for one of their special memory upgrade offers. Under their deal, a 20GB hard drive will run you $20—not bad, considering Microsoft usually sells it for closer to $80. [<i>- Thanks Adam!</i>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062941/microsoft-nxe-deal-upgrades-your-xbox-360-memory-for-less]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062941/microsoft-nxe-deal-upgrades-your-xbox-360-memory-for-less]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Dealzmodo ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Memory upgrade ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Microsoft ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ new Xbox experience ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ nxe ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Xbox ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Xbox 360 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Xbox 360 20GB hard drive ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ xbox 360 hard drive ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Xbox dashboard ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Elaine Chow</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062941&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Life-Sized Autobot Assembles in French Parking Lot, Doesn't Really Roll Out [Transformers] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/transformers01_triptique_web.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="664" height="216" style="display:block;float:none;" />French performance art troupe <a href="http://www.notsonoisy.com/transformers/index.html">"Not So Noisy"</a> have spent the last month "assembling" giant, life-sized Autobots from normal cars, and shooting the action from overhead. Of course, they're not really building anything. They're really arranging cars (or people) in an empty parking lot so that it looks like Optimus Prime knocked back a few too many quarts of oil and passed out. But it's awesome.</p> <p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/epEjByo2G-M&hl=en&fs=1"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/epEjByo2G-M&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></object></p> <p>In addition to photographing each event, they have time lapse footage of the process, which is pretty neat to watch. Not So Noisy has done this three times&mdash;once with cars and trucks, once with <a href="http://www.notsonoisy.com/transformers/02.html">RetroBuses</a> and once with <a href="http://www.notsonoisy.com/transformers/03.html">people</a>. I love each one equally. [<a href="http://www.notsonoisy.com/transformers/index.html">Not So Noisy</a>]</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/transformers02_triptique_web.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="664" height="216" style="display:block;float:none;" /></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062937/life+sized-autobot-assembles-in-french-parking-lot-doesnt-really-roll-out]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062937/life+sized-autobot-assembles-in-french-parking-lot-doesnt-really-roll-out]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Transformers ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Art ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Autobots ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Not So Noisy ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Parking Lot Transformers ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Performance Art ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Stunts ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:30:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Adrian Covert</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062937&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Joost Flash Player Launches Tonight, Has Serious Hulu Envy [Joost] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/joostv.jpg" width="600" height="251" style="display:block;float:none;" />The poor kids at Joost&mdash;and their partners at Viacom&mdash;thought the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/video-wars/tv-on-your-pc-hulu-joost-and-miro-reviewed-323787.php">future of TV on the computer</a> would be a discrete app that blended a slick TV emulator with internets! power. They were wrong, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5046345/a-complete-guide-to-watching-your-favorite-shows-legally-without-paying-a-dime">Hulu and Google were right</a>: It's all about the browser. So that's where <a href="http://gizmodo.com/393067/hunting-for-viewers-joost-moves-to-your-browser">Joost is going</a>. Its Flash-based player officially launches full-throttle tonight. The early word from paidContent is that it's still no Hulu&mdash;the best place for CBS content, maybe, but it's got a lot of catching up to do. Though really, it's not clear that it ever can. There's a reason <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5061851/internet-tv-remote-quick-links-to-free-streaming-shows">our internet TV remote</a> is heavy on the Hulu. [<a href="http://www.joost.com/">Joost</a> via <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-joost-launches-flash-version-for-browsers/">paidContent</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062934/joost-flash-player-launches-tonight-has-serious-hulu-envy]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062934/joost-flash-player-launches-tonight-has-serious-hulu-envy]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Joost ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ CBS ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Hulu ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Internet tv remote control ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Nbc ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Online Video ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Streaming episodes ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ streaming tv ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Television ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>matt buchanan</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062934&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ BlackBerry Bold Squirms Closer to AT&T Release [Blackberry Bold] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/blackberryyellowpages1.jpg" width="350" height="233" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"/>Whatever <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5061348/orange-pulls-blackberry-bold-over-quality-concerns">hellish limbo</a> the BlackBerry Bold is trapped in <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5058936/blackberry-bolds-us-debut-delayed-yet-again">keeping it off of AT&T</a>, it's poking out its head just a little bit. If you've got an unlocked Bold running on AT&T, you might notice a few new icons and service books for YellowPages.com Mobile and AT&T Navigator just got pushed to it. So it is actually moving forward in some way, even if it's definitely stretching into the full range of the "year's end" promise from AT&T and RIM. [<A href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2008/10/13/blackberry-bold-nearing-release-on-att/">BGR</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062926/blackberry-bold-squirms-closer-to-att-release]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062926/blackberry-bold-squirms-closer-to-att-release]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ blackberry bold ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ At&t ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ BlackBerry ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Blackberry 9000 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Blackberry Bold delay ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ bold ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Cellphones ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Rim ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Smartphones ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:30:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>matt buchanan</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062926&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ TSA Airport Screener Steals Over $200,000 in Gadgets, Almost Gets Away With It [Tsa] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/airportsa_01.jpg" width="494" height="371" style="display:block;float:none;" />Transportation Security Administration baggage screener Pythias Brown is the reason you hate flying with expensive gear in your bag, especially if you ever flew out of Newark airport. Over the last few years, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/2008/10/10/tsa-agent-helped-himself-to-a-47-900-camera-and-more/">he stole at least $200,000 worth of electronics</a>. Not just a camcorder here, a laptop there, or an Xbox 360 or two, either. No, this guy had balls. Among his biggest hauls&mdash;literally&mdash;was an HBO employee's $47,900 camera. And the TSA was totally clueless about it. He was finally caught after CNN found a camera he had stolen from them up <a href="http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback2&ftab=AllFeedback&userid=alirla&iid=-1&de=off&items=25&page=3">for sale on eBay</a>.</p> <p>When the USPS and local police tracked him down and raided his place, they found they found 66 cameras, 31 laptops, jewelry, camera lenses, GPS devices and more. So yeah, how does a TSA screener systematically walk out of the airport with more gadgets than Best Buy&mdash;hell, with some gear you can't even buy there&mdash;without a single agent ever noticing? I guess if you ever check anything actually valuable, you might want avoid Newark (not that there aren't a million more reasons to avoid Newark). [<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2008/10/10/tsa-agent-helped-himself-to-a-47-900-camera-and-more/">Gadling</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/10/13/tsa-screener-ripped.html">BoingBoing</a> <em>Photo: Flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jpf/278019395/">Joel Franusic</a></em> ]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062913/tsa-airport-screener-steals-over-200000-in-gadgets-almost-gets-away-with-it]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062913/tsa-airport-screener-steals-over-200000-in-gadgets-almost-gets-away-with-it]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Tsa ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Airport ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Dhs ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Government ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Security ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Theft ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:10:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>matt buchanan</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062913&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Aevex Gloves Self-Heat Using Hidden Lithium Batteries [Gloves] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Aevex_Gloves.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="494" height="301" style="display:block;float:none;" />Surprise, the reason your ski jacket doesn't have a heater in it is because nobody likes lugging around the car battery required to keep it running. But like many portable electronics, Aevex harnessed the stored energy of lithium-polymer batteries, form shaping them to fit snugly inside a glove. You get 4-6 hours of hand baking, allocated only where it's needed along your palm and fingers.</p> <p>The gloves themselves&mdash;the $300 <a href="http://www.mountainhardwear.com/Product.aspx?top=1431&cat=1487&prod=3142">Mountain Hardwear Red Savina</a> and the $260 <a href="http://www.outdoorresearch.com/site/m_s_primovolta_gloves.html">Outdoor Research PrimoVolta</a>&mdash;get charged by being plugged into the wall, and are activated by pressing large obvious buttons on the exterior near the wrist.</p> <p>Inside, the fabric itself is a layering of power, comfort and thermostatic-control panels:<br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Aevex_Material.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="494" height="240" style="display:block;float:none;" /><br> One layer reads the temperature of every part of your hand like a tightly knit grid, and allocates heat where it's coldest. When the finger gets warm, the heater eases off.</p> <p>Aevex says it'll have the jacket dilemma solved by 2009, and ditto for boots (or at least socks of some kind. Now, if we can all just try and forget about that whole "exploding lithium-ion battery" thing, I think we've got something. [<a href="http://www.aevex.com/">Aevex</a> via <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10064548-1.html">CNet</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062912/aevex-gloves-self+heat-using-hidden-lithium-batteries]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062912/aevex-gloves-self+heat-using-hidden-lithium-batteries]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Gloves ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Aevex ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Apparel ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Batteries ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Clothes ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Clothing ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ lithium ion ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ lithium polymer ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Mountain hardwear ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Outdoor research ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Winter clothes ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:53:52 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062912&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Acer Releases AX3200 Blu-Ray Desktop PC and P244W 1080p LCD Display [Desktops] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/ASX3200_03_1.jpg" width="207" height="263" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="2">WIth their Blu-ray-playing AX3200 desktop PC and accompanying 24-inch, 1080p monitor, Acer just released two affordable, HD-friendly products at a combined price that sits just over $1000. With the compact dimensions of around 10"x4"x14", the AX3200 desktop has 2.1 GHZ AMD Phenom X3 8450 processor, HDMI-out, Dolby Home Theater 5.1 sound and nine USB ports. A 640 GB HDD, multi-card reader and 4 GB RAM round out the internal specs for the Windows Vista machine.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/acer_p244w_lcd.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="519" height="415" style="display:block;float:none;" />The P244W monitor is also well-equipped, with 1920x1080 resolution (16:9) and 20000:1 contrast ratio. It has 75 Hz refresh rate, 2 ms response time, has two HDMI ports and one VGA input. The AX3200 is now available at Fry's for $680, while the P244W monitor is available at major electronics retailers for $340. [<a href="http://us.acer.com/public/page4.do?link=oln56.redirect&dau22.oid=42001&UserCtxParam=0&GroupCtxParam=0&dctx1=25&CountryISOCtxParam=US&LanguageISOCtxParam=en&ctx3=150&ctx4=United+States&crc=1883982558#inu57_54888">Acer</a>]</p> <blockquote> <p>ACER'S NEW PHENOM X3 DESKTOP AND 24-INCH LCD – ELEGANT IN FORM AND FUNCTION</p> <p>AX3200 desktop packs big performance in a small box; Stunning 24-inch widescreen LCD features one-touch convenience</p> <p>SAN JOSE, CALIF., Oct. 13, 2008 – Acer, the third largest vendor in the PC market,(1) today announced the new Acer® AX3200 desktop PC and Acer P244W 24-inch widescreen LCD display for customers in the United States. Feature-rich, stylish and space-saving, the new desktop and display are ideal for enjoying entertainment from any room in the home.</p> <p>Outfitted with AMD Phenom(TM) X3 processing power, Blu-ray Disc(TM) technology, NVIDIA® GeForce® graphics and Dolby Home Theater® sound, the AX3200 is a multimedia powerhouse. The Acer P244W display is simple to use and brilliantly showcases high-definition video, games and multimedia with 1080p HD support and 1920x1080 resolution.</p> <p>"Offering 64-bit Windows, a Blu-ray drive and significant memory, the Acer AX3200 packs plenty of power for tackling the demands of multitasking and the latest digital entertainment,” said Stephanie Eggert, Senior Manager, Retail Desktop Product Planning for Acer America. "The P244W display's stunning picture quality and user-friendly design make it a must-have for the home. Users choosing to combine the 24-inch display with the compact desktop, will have an excellent system for enjoying productivity, movies, music and games without taking up a lot of space.”</p> <p>Compact Entertainment Hub<br> Smaller than standard systems, the handsome black tower measures just 10.4-inches (H) x 4-inches (W) x 14.4-inches (L). For easy access, the chassis was designed with the card reader, audio jacks and ports conveniently on the front of the PC.</p> <p>Boasting outstanding performance, the AX3200 features an AMD Phenom(TM) X3 8450 Processor with triple-core power, so users can enjoy crystal-clear digital media, create advanced graphics, and handle critical productivity tasks with ease. The 4GB DDR2 memory provides ultra-fast system response, critical for multitasking and power hungry applications.</p> <p>An integrated Blu-Ray Disc(TM) optical drive takes high-definition entertainment to the max with full support for realistic and dynamic high-definition viewing. Integrated NVIDIA® GeForce® graphics enhance multimedia performance with support for the latest DirectX games.</p> <p>Dolby Home Theater® provides theater-like surround sound with up to 5.1 separate channels of crystal-clear digital audio. An HDMI port delivers crisp high-quality visuals and high-fidelity audio using only one cable.</p> <p>With nine USB 2.0 ports, an IEEE 1394 port, eSATA port and a Multi-in-One card reader, users can easily bring multimedia devices together (used this phase in processor graph). The huge 640GB SATA II hard drive (2) provides enough room to store a vast library of music, movies and games.</p> <p>Intuitive 24-inch High-Definition LCD<br> The new Acer P244W 24-inch widescreen high-definition LCD display combines superior usability with sleek styling. It boasts a polished black bezel and base with silver accents for an elegant design that will enhance any home or office. The large 24-inch screen size is perfect for evaluating multiple documents at one time.</p> <p>The Acer P244W also features SensorTouch technology, a touch-sensing solution with effortless settings for one-touch convenience. The LED illuminated controls replace the buttons that are standard on many displays. These intuitive controls maintain the product's streamlined look, while automatically sensing contact with the lightest touch.</p> <p>Featuring excellent resolution, a high contrast ratio and fast response time, the display emits superb visual quality. It delivers 1080p HD support and a 1920x1080 resolution, including full HD support for the hottest HD-DVD or Blu-ray Disc movies and console games.</p> <p>To further improve the picture quality, this new display offers a 20,000:1 contrast ratio and 300 cd/m2 brightness. The new Acer P244W features a 2ms response time, reducing the deviations in transition time. The Acer Overdrive (OD) technology enables the display to improve the gray-to-gray level in images and amplify the moving picture viewing experience. Additionally, 170-degree horizontal and 160-degree vertical viewing angles offer extended viewing of entertainment and productivity applications.</p> <p>Acer's unique software solutions boost usability. The eColor Management on-screen interface allows users to tailor the performance characteristics of the display, such as brightness, saturation and contrast. The Empowering Key enables users to switch between viewing scenarios and create their own to compensate for application and environmental constraints.</p> <p>Specifications, Pricing and Availability<br> The Aspire AX3200-U3630A desktop PC is available at Fry's with a manufacturer's suggested retail price (MSRP) of $679.99. The Acer P244W 24-inch LCD display is available at technology and electronics retailers with a manufacturer's suggested retail price of $339.</p> <p>Acer® AX3200-U3630A: Available now for a MSRP of $679.99<br> • AMD Phenom(TM) X3 Triple-Core 8450 Processor (2.1GHz, 512KB X 3 L2 Cache)<br> • 4096MB DDR2 Memory, Dual Channel<br> • NVIDIA® GeForce® 8200 Chipset<br> • Integrated NVIDIA® GeForce® 8200 Graphics Solution<br> • 640GB SATA II (7200RPM, 8MB Cache) (2)<br> • Blu-ray Disc(TM)/DVD-Super Multi Double-Layer Drive<br> • Multi-in-One Digital Media Card Reader<br> • 56K ITU v.92 Ready Fax/Modem (RJ-11 Port)<br> • Optimized Dolby Home Theater®<br> • Windows Vista® Home Premium 64-Bit with SP1<br> • 9 USB 2.0 Ports (5 Front, 4 Rear)<br> • IEEE 1394 Port<br> • HDMI Port<br> • eSATA Port<br> • Amplified Stereo Speakers (USB Powered)<br> • Acer USB Keyboard<br> • USB Optical Mouse</p> <p>Acer® P244W 24-inch LCD display: Available now for a MSRP of $339<br> • 24-inch Widescreen<br> • 0.276mm Pixel Pitch<br> • 1920x1080 (native and maximum) Resolution<br> • 1080p High-Def Support<br> • 75Hz (Maximum) Refresh Rate<br> • 2ms (Gray to Gray) Response Time<br> • 20000:1 (ACM) Contrast Ratio<br> • 300cd/m2 Brightness<br> • 170° (H)/160° (V) Viewing Angles<br> • 16.7 Million Colors<br> • 6 + Hi-FRC Bits<br> • 2x HDMI, 1x VGA Inputs<br> • Vesa 100MM Wall Mount<br> • Internal Power Supply<br> • Energy Star Compliant</p> <p>Practical Software<br> The Acer AX3200 desktop comes with Genuine Windows Vista® Home Premium 64-Bit with Service Pack 1, which provides performance for video, large database searches, or games and other programs that require complex calculations and a lot of memory.</p> <p>The new AMD LIVE!(TM) Explorer, available for download, offers an immersive way to manage and interact with the user's entertainment library. It provides the ability to explore complete digital collections of music, photos, and videos in a single window, in full 3D.</p> <p>In addition, the system comes with Adobe® Reader®, McAfee® Internet Security Suite 2008, eSobi(TM) online search efficiency software, NTI Media Maker(TM) for multimedia fun and back-up as well as Acer Arcade(TM) Live, a powerful software package for editing, viewing, burning and managing media content.</p> </blockquote> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062908/acer-releases-ax3200-blu+ray-desktop-pc-and-p244w-1080p-lcd-display]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062908/acer-releases-ax3200-blu+ray-desktop-pc-and-p244w-1080p-lcd-display]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Desktops ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Acer ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Acer AX3200 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Acer p244W ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Ax3200 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Computers ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Displays ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Monitors ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ P244W ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ PCs ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:40:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Adrian Covert</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062908&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Epson Artisan 800 All-In-One Lightning Review [Lightning Review] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Epson_Artisan_800.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="494" height="339" style="display:block;float:none;" /><strong>The Gadget:</strong> The Epson Artisan 800 All-In-One with Wi-Fi and fax. On paper, it has all the signs of being the best AIO ever made, especially for people who want versatility but care deeply about fine photographic prints.</p> <p><strong>The Price:</strong> $300</p> <p><strong>The Verdict:</strong> So far, man is it <i>awesome</i>... for a printer/scanner/copier/fax machine, that is.</p> <p>I know printers. Like intimately. For a few years, I'd get the newest ones and run a double-blind print quality test. I got bored because Epson would always win. HP accused me of letting personal taste get in the way of objectivity, to which I replied, "Call me back when you get the color blue figured out." (My phone has yet to ring.)</p> <p>Anyway, when I heard about Epson's total revamp of its all-in-one, I was happy and scared. Epson might have been the champ at photo quality, but its printers weren't always the easiest to use. Besides, they were often slower than Canons or HPs. But the Artisan could have traded in print quality to improve speed (an old HP trick). And besides, the Artisan has Wi-Fi, a sure sign of future tech-support calls.</p> <p>Happily, my fears turned out to be nonsense: Setting up the printer was easy (though I did follow directions carefully, which is not my standard MO). The wizard worked great on the Mac, and I easily added the printer's wireless profile and drivers to another Mac and a Vista PC afterward with the same install disc, all printing without a hiccup. You might say "Big whup!" but trust me, wireless networking set-ups often don't work as billed, especially across both Macs and PCs.</p> <p>The new touchscreen interface is great, giving you plenty of soft options in plain English, rather than a few choices in terse one-word buttons. As you can see in the shots below, there are fixed contextual touch buttons in addition to the LCD, making the interface even more flexible. I especially like that the fax dial-pad is hidden away, so that if you use it, great, but if you don't, you won't feel like you're wasting part of your purchase. Speaking of fax, the 800 has a document sheet feeder built right in, crucial for multi-page faxes and useful for copying and scanning too.<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Epson_Artisan_800_screens.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="494" height="467" style="display:block;float:none;" />The print quality was amazing, as I anticipated. What surprised me was how damn fast this bugger is. I could get a gorgeous borderless 4x6 in under 18 seconds, and of course it could manage larger sizes fairly speedily too, including the elusive 8x10. (HP once told me that 8x10, which it didn't support, wasn't in demand by photographers; Epson has always had an 8x10 option.)</p> <p>The one thing you're <em>still</em> gonna hate about the printer is that each ink cartridge is <em>still</em> the size of a matchbook and damn if you won't burn through them all too fast. You get a second (BONUS!) black cartridge in the box, but all that tells me is that Epson is embarrassed about its ink addiction. Other printer makers will try harder to solve the ink-deficit problem&mdash;Kodak sells printers for more money and ink for less&mdash;but inevitably that solution comes at the cost of good hardware and high-quality prints. Go with Epson if you want the best pictures and, in this case, the best all around use, but remember that you will pay for that satisfaction in ink. [<a href="http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/consumer/consDetail.jsp?BV_UseBVCookie=yes&oid=63075471">Epson</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062889/epson-artisan-800-all+in+one-lightning-review]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062889/epson-artisan-800-all+in+one-lightning-review]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ lightning review ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ All in ones ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Copier ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Epson ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Epson all in one ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Epson artisan 800 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Epson printers ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Fax ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Hp ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Photo printing ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Printers ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Scanner ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Verizonbestmodo ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:10:15 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062889&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Microsoft Settles on "Windows 7" For Official Name of Next OS [Not Just A Code Name] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/windows7-ballmer.jpg" width="494" height="132" style="display:block;float:none;" />Here we were, thinking <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-7">Windows 7</a> was simply a codename (and a fairly boring one at that—where's <em>Longhorn</em>? <em>Whistler</em>?). Now, on the official <a href="http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2008/10/13/introducing-windows-7.aspx">Windows Vista Blog</a>, MS has came out and declared "Windows 7" the official name of Vista's successor, dev-only pre-betas of which will be released at the upcoming WinHEC and PDC developer conferences over the next few weeks. The reason why probably makes sense, to someone, somewhere...</p> <blockquote> <p>The decision to use the name Windows 7 is about simplicity. Over the years, we have taken different approaches to naming Windows. We've used version numbers like Windows 3.11, or dates like Windows 98, or "aspirational" monikers like Windows XP or Windows Vista. And since we do not ship new versions of Windows every year, using a date did not make sense. Likewise, coming up with an all-new "aspirational" name does not do justice to what we are trying to achieve, which is to stay firmly rooted in our aspirations for Windows Vista, while evolving and refining the substantial investments in platform technology in Windows Vista into the next generation of Windows.</p> </blockquote> <p>In the end, though, names are just names. Remember the outrage over <em>Wii</em>? Now who even gives that a second thought? I've also thought the cat-based naming of OS X was always a little hoaky; I still like the Secret Service-inspired code names better. What would you have called the next Windows? [<a href="http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2008/10/13/introducing-windows-7.aspx">Windows Developer Blog</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062877/microsoft-settles-on-windows-7-for-official-name-of-next-os]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062877/microsoft-settles-on-windows-7-for-official-name-of-next-os]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Not just a code name ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Microsoft ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Operating Systems ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ oss ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Windows ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ windows 7 ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:27:55 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>John Mahoney</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062877&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Question of the Day: Do You Prefer Self-Checkout Lines? [Question Of The Day] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/self-checkout.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="494" height="371" style="display:block;float:none;" />For an impatient geek there is nothing...NOTHING more annoying than standing behind someone in a grocery store that has the audacity to write a check in the 21st century. That is why I head for the self-checkout lines. Generally, only those brave enough to tackle the machine and handle the pressure of nerds staring them down choose this option (athough I have seen people use checks in self-checkout&mdash;the ultimate horror). Even when I have quite a few purchases, I would rather scan it myself and avoid any unnecessary human interaction. But what about you? Do you prefer self-checkout over manned registers?</p> <p><script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript" src="http://polls.gawker.com/poll.js.php?key==AjNzUTM"> </script><noscript> <p><b>Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.</b></p> </noscript></p> <p>[Image via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/o_rly/170554161/">Sickpuppy's Flickr</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062839/question-of-the-day-do-you-prefer-self+checkout-lines]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062839/question-of-the-day-do-you-prefer-self+checkout-lines]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Question of the Day ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Gadgets ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Registers ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ self-checkout ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062839&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Sony Ericcson W760a Picked Up by AT&T [Sony Ericcson W760a] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/w760a.JPG" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="463" height="308" style="display:block;float:none;" />It has been a couple of months since we <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5035367/sony-ericsson-w760a-coming-to-att-says-rumor">first heard the rumor</a> that the 3G-enabled <a href="http://gizmodo.com/341745/sony-ericsson-w760-and-slick-new-walkman-interface-hands-on">Sony Ericcson W760a</a> and its updated Walkman interface would arrive on AT&T, but it appears that the day has finally arrived. Features include a 3.2 megapixel camera, GPS and full-HTML web browsing for $129.99 after a two-year agreement and a $50 mail-in rebate. [<a href="http://ca.news.finance.yahoo.com/s/13102008/31/link-f-prnewswire-t-offers-new-sony-ericsson-w760a-walkman-tm.html">Yahoo</a> via <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2008/10/13/sony-ericsson-w760a-arrives-at-att.html">IntoMobile</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062868/sony-ericcson-w760a-picked-up-by-att]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062868/sony-ericcson-w760a-picked-up-by-att]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Sony ericcson w760a ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ At&t ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Cellphones ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Sony ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Sony Ericsson ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ W760a ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Walkman ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:55:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062868&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Are Our Cushy, Tech-Filled Lifestyles Halting Evolution? [Science] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/couch_potato.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="469" height="413" style="display:block;float:none;" />Back in the good old days, the weak, slow and stupid would be eaten by lions, leaving the quick and the smart to live on and breed quick and smart babies. But these days, any moron can wheel themselves around a Wal-mart on a motorized scooter, buying Hot Pockets with food stamps while talking on their prepaid cellphones, going home to have 15 other fat, stupid babies. This isn't evolution! It's de-evolution! And we have technology to thank for it.</p> <p>Well, at least according to British genetics expert Steve Jones. "In a modern world of central heating and plenty of food, the same mutation is far less likely to give a child any advantage. A baby born today can expect to live a long and healthy life, which in turn works against the evolutionary tool of natural selection."</p> <p>Basically, living in this technologically-advanced era "greatly reduces the influence of mutation, random change and natural selection, the three major forces of evolution." That means it's no longer survivor of the fittest, instead just survival of everyone. Which means we won't be seeing as many changes in the species as we've seen in the last few millennia. Instead we may have hit a plateau, a plateau where everyone gets to add their seeds to the gene pool no matter how dumb and slow they are.</p> <p>Dammit, and I was hoping my grandkids would have super hearing and be 8 feet tall. [<a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/HealthSci/Western_man_has_stopped_evolving/articleshow/3569369.cms">Times of India</a> via <a href="http://www.psfk.com/2008/10/cushy-lifestyles-curb-evolution.html">PSFK</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062823/are-our-cushy-tech+filled-lifestyles-halting-evolution]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062823/are-our-cushy-tech+filled-lifestyles-halting-evolution]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Science ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Evolution ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Gadgets ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:30:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062823&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ A Brief History of MacBook Redesigns and Upgrades [Apple] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/macbooktiminelinfixed.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/macbooktimeline_small_crop.jpg" width="494" height="344" style="display:block;float:none;" /></a></p> <div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript"> digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa'; digg_url = 'http://digg.com/apple/A_Timeline_of_MacBook_Redesigns_and_Upgrades'; </script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"> </script></div> <p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5062706/apples-brickbook-macbook-event-10-am-pst-october-14">Tomorrow we'll see</a> the first fresh MacBooks in almost a year, and likely the first all-new case designs since the arrival of the MacBooks&mdash;or before that if you're a stickler, since the MacBook Pro is basically the same as the PowerBook G4, and the MacBook ain't so different from the iBook G4. Check out our timeline of every MacBook update since the lines were introduced to see just how much (or little) has changed since the beginning.</p> <p>Some notes&mdash;these are all stock configurations with prices at the time of release, and specs are only noted when they change. For instance, if the MacBook kept a 60GB hard drive standard for two revisions, you won't see it on the second update on the chart. Click on the image to see the massive full-size chart.[<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/tag/apple/laptops/">MacBooks on Giz</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062813/a-brief-history-of-macbook-redesigns-and-upgrades]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062813/a-brief-history-of-macbook-redesigns-and-upgrades]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Apple ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Laptops ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Mac ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MacBook ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MacBook Air ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MacBook Pro ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Macs ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Notebooks ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Verizonbestmodo ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>matt buchanan</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062813&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ New Technology Helps Ground Telescopes Outdo Hubble [Telescopes] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/star_seperator.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="494" height="396" style="display:block;float:none;" />A new technology called nulling interferometry will give some of the world's biggest telescopes the power to detect Earth-like planets outside our solar system&mdash;something even the Hubble has not accomplished. Basically, nulling interferometry chains together the light captured by several large telescopes to create a single "super telescope" that has enough power to detect a quarter lying on the surface of the moon. Currently, an array of telescopes in Chile's Atacama Desert known as the Very Large Telescope Interferometer (VLTI) is being outfitted with a nulling device called PRIMA.</p> <p>The PRIMA system consists of many small mirrors that are moved by pistons at levels that are smaller than an atom. The light from each telescope is reflected into underground tunnels in a way that cancels out the light waves from a star. What remains is the faint light of an orbiting planet&mdash;hopefully a planet capable of harboring life. Apparently, PRIMA will start hunting down E.T. in about six months time&mdash;and according to Fred Kamphues, developer of a major component of PRIMA called a Star Separator, we stand a good chance of finding them inside the next 100 years. Meanwhile, a high-level government official who has had E.T. on ice for the last 60 years is laughing his ass off. [<a href="http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/10/telescope-tech.html">Wired Science</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062792/new-technology-helps-ground-telescopes-outdo-hubble]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062792/new-technology-helps-ground-telescopes-outdo-hubble]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ telescopes ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Aliens ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Nulling interferometry ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ prima ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Science ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Space ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:40:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062792&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 10 Gadgets With Mind-Boggling Moving Parts [Epic Gadgets] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/mind-boggling-gadgets.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="750" height="222" style="display:block;float:none;" />At their best, gadgets transcend the world of technology and become "living" works of art. The following ten gadgets are awe-inspiring in their complexity, mind boggling in their motion and beautiful enough to stand alongside the work of any old master. Naturally, there is a clock or two, but there are also calculators, a Rube Goldberg machine and a crazy moving building rounding out the list.</p> <div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript"> digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa'; digg_url = 'http://digg.com/gadgets/Epic_Gadgets_10_Gadgets_With_Mind_Boggling_Moving_Parts'; </script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"> </script></div> <p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> galleryPost('movingmachines', 10, ''); </script></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062544/10-gadgets-with-mind+boggling-moving-parts]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062544/10-gadgets-with-mind+boggling-moving-parts]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Epic gadgets ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Antikythera Mechanism ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Babbage difference engine ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Calculator ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Clocks ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Feature ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Gadgets ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Orrery ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ rube goldberg ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Space Shuttle ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Top ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Watches ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062544&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ President Bush Signs Bill To Create Cabinet-Level Intellectual Property Czar [Piracy] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Tsar_nikolai.jpg" width="494" height="492" style="display:block;float:none;" />President Bush signed into law today a bill that will create a centralized position in the executive branch, appointed by the president, to head up the fight against piracy and intellectual property violations. The Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act (PRO-IP) is backed strongly by the usuals—MPAA, RIAA, etc.—and yet faced some pushback from the Justice Department and the Bush administration itself as it made its way through the House and Senate. So what does it all mean?</p> <p>The cabinet position will give a single point of authority to a job now handled by a scattered handful of different agencies and committees. It also calls for increased strength to prosecute and punish IP offenders. A provision that hoisted the responsibility for civil (in addition to criminal) prosecutions for IP cases on the Justice Dept. had to be thrown out first, as it would have effectively gave the already over-burdened folks at the DoJ the added enjoyment of being the entertainment companies' civil trial lawyers. Also, interestingly, the Bush administration apparently forgot about their earlier weariness to politicize a position (by appointment) so closely related to dealings of the legislative branch and the judiciary—because avoiding that kind of thing has been this administration's hallmark, right?</p> <p>What it will mean day-to-day for us modern web users remains to be seen, but creating a czar worked so well for the war on drugs, why not try it again? [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10064527-38.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20">CNET</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062785/president-bush-signs-bill-to-create-cabinet+level-intellectual-property-czar]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062785/president-bush-signs-bill-to-create-cabinet+level-intellectual-property-czar]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Piracy ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Intellectual Property ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Intellectual property czar ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Politics ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Pro-ip ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:47:42 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>John Mahoney</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062785&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Long Overdue GPS Upgrade Could Save Airlines $10 Billion a Year [GPS] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/airplane-routes.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="500" height="277" style="display:block;float:none;" />Technically speaking, you have better navigational capability in your car than the entire airline industry. Why? Because they are still relying on an antiquated WWII era traffic network that often takes aircraft on zigzagging routes towards radar beacons&mdash;costing carriers billions of dollars in wasted fuel each year. To make matters worse, the plan to upgrade the system has been stuck in the planning stages for more than a decade thanks to funding issues an the complexity of such a switchover.</p> <p>A switch to GPS could save carriers $10 billion a year in fuel and it would also increase efficiency&mdash;allowing more planes to fly on more routes at the same time. In other words, it could be a financial windfall that would help the airline industry get back on its feet. Yes, making the switch would be extremely complex, but this is really a question about priorities. We simply cannot continue to bail out the airlines every time things go south. Unfortunately, the government does not believe they can get planes flying in a straight line until at least 2020. [<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2008-10-10-airlines-gps_N.htm">USA Today</a> via <a href="http://digg.com/travel_places/Airlines_could_save_10_billion_a_year_with_GPS">Digg</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062726/long-overdue-gps-upgrade-could-save-airlines-10-billion-a-year]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062726/long-overdue-gps-upgrade-could-save-airlines-10-billion-a-year]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ GPS ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Airlines ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Airplanes ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Gps airplanes ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Navigation ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Radar ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:10:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062726&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Remember This? Looking Back at the First PowerBook [Retromodo] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><object width="494" height="399"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/U1hyA07V5lQ&hl=en&fs=1"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/U1hyA07V5lQ&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="494" height="399"></object></p> <div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript"> digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa'; digg_url = 'http://digg.com/apple/Remember_This_Looking_Back_at_the_First_PowerBook_PICS'; </script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"> </script></div> <p>With <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5055082/apple-macbook-2008-event-all-the-rumors-in-one-place">new Macbooks seemingly imminent</a>, I thought it'd be a good time to look back in time to the first Apple laptop that changed portable computing forever: the original PowerBook.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/powerbook100.jpg" class="center" width="500" height="441" style="display:block;float:none;" />Back in 1991, Apple wasn't the company it is today. There was no iPod, no iTunes Music Store, no iPhone. At the time, laptops (or "portable computers," such as the <a href="http://lowendmac.com/pb/macintosh-portable.html">Macintosh Portable</a>) were <a href="http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/bllaptop.htm">niche devices</a>, extremely expensive and not all that practical. But the PowerBook 100 made some huge steps forward for laptops.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/necultralite.jpg" class="center" width="600" height="241" style="display:block;float:none;" />While it wasn't the first portable computer to take what we see today as a laptop's form (that honor goes to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEC_UltraLite">NEC UltraLite</a>, above, released in 1989), it made some steps forward in the design. For example, the flat surface in front of the keyboard that you can rest your hands on? That first appeared with the first PowerBooks. It also integrated a trackball &#8212; though it's been replaced by other pointing devices, its spirit remains.. Due to these strong design elements, the PowerBook ended up <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_inc#1986.E2.80.931993:_Rise_and_fall">selling very well</a>, leading to high profits and a strong era for Apple (soon to be dashed by failures such as the Newton, Mac clones and the runaway overlapping product lines of the mid 1990s).</p> <p>Watching this ad for the very first PowerBooks, it's funny to see Apple going hard after business users, the very same type mocked in today's Apple ads by John Hodgman. Sales reports! How very <i>unhip</i>. Before the MacBook became the laptop of choice of coffeshop-located freelance graphic designers, Apple wanted its laptops to be the choice of the suit set.</p> <p>The <a href="http://lowendmac.com/pb/powerbook-100.html">PowerBook 100</a> was the cheapest of the three PowerBooks first introduced by Apple in 1991. Its price was $2,300, which is surprisingly close to how much MacBook Pros are today. Sure, the form factor has changed a lot, as has the hardware inside and the software loaded on it. But isn't it comforting to think that, nearly 20 years later, you're still gonna drop around $2,000 on a new Apple laptop? In an unstable time, it's nice to see some things stay the same.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062697/remember-this-looking-back-at-the-first-powerbook]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062697/remember-this-looking-back-at-the-first-powerbook]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Retromodo ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Apple ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Clips ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Feature ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Laptops ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ MacBook ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Powerbook ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Top ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:40:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062697&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ iLIMB Bionic Hand Comes Closer to Emulating the Real Thing [Thumbs Up] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><script type="text/javascript"> newVideoPlayer("/Robothand.flv", 506, 423,""); </script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/Robothand.flv.jpg" style="display:block;display: none;" />We've written about the amazing <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/high-five!/ilimb-bionic-hand-looks-feels-like-the-real-thing-279604.php">iLIMB bionic hand</a> before, but the newest version of it was showed off on the Today Show this morning, and it looks pretty incredible.</p> <p>For one, the guy who had it was able to simply pop one off and put another on without skipping a beat, with the new hand working almost instantly. He seemed able to control the fingers easily, and he had the added bonus of being able to rotate the hand 360 degrees, which is something those of us with fleshy, non-bionic hands are unable to do. In the future, bionic hands won't be replacements for real hands; they'll be upgrades.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062680/ilimb-bionic-hand-comes-closer-to-emulating-the-real-thing]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062680/ilimb-bionic-hand-comes-closer-to-emulating-the-real-thing]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ thumbs up ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Bionic Hand ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Clips ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Gadgets ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ iLimb ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:20:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062680&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ $900 Contraption Trims Your CDs to Make Them Rounder, You Poorer [Audiophiles] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/audiodesksysteme.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="530" height="397" style="display:block;float:none;" />We've certainly seen our fair share of insane, overpriced equipment aimed at overmonied audiophiles (usually from <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/furutech">Furutech</a>), but this is a new one to me. The Audio Desk Systeme from Germany takes your CD, spins it at a super-high speed, and uses a blade to cut it down to a more perfect circle. Apparently, this prevents very slight wobbling as it spins, which can create a jitter in the digital stream that affects the sound, according to idiots. It's a mere $900, which, in these circles, is a total bargain. [<a href="http://www.ultrasystem.com/audiodeskpricesheet.html">Ultra System</a> via <a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2008/10/audio_desk_trim.php">Dvice</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062660/900-contraption-trims-your-cds-to-make-them-rounder-you-poorer]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062660/900-contraption-trims-your-cds-to-make-them-rounder-you-poorer]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Audiophiles ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ CDs ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Gadgets ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Idiots ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062660&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
														
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Robotic Repair System Could Rescue Us From Falling Satellites [Space Junk] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><object width="494" height="400"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GWNqM5DFpwc&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GWNqM5DFpwc&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="494" height="400"></embed></object>As you probably already know, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/378713/space-is-full-of-crap">space is full of crap</a>. It's not something the average Joe thinks about, but when the government starts <a href="http://gizmodo.com/392554/inside-video-of-operation-blow-up-a-satellite-heart-pounding-actionwith-missiles">blowing dead satellites out of the sky</a>, it may be time to start worrying whether or not the gadget that brings soft-core pornography to your TV will end up crushing you as you mow the lawn. Researchers at Queen’s University are jumping in to help with the problem by developing a robotic repair system that will service the approx. 8000 satellites currently orbiting the Earth. Keep in mind that about only around 800 of those satellites are currently operational. </p> <p>The core of the system will involve tracking software that alerts a Autonomous Space Servicing Vehicle (ASSV) to a satellites location. Once found, it will draw the device into its bay where humans on the ground can conduct remote-controlled repairs. So far, the main obstacle to the development of the ASSV has been computer vision. Any robot attempting to grab a satellite must not only locate the device but determine and match its motion before making a move. To aid in that situation, the researchers will employ a form of light-based radar called LIDAR, "which provides a set of 3D points that accurately measure the surface geometry of the satellite." The video above illustrates this real-time tracking sequence. So far, there is no word on when such a system might be deployed. [<a href="http://qnc.queensu.ca/story_loader.php?id=48e4ef8cb38ab">Queens University</a> via <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081002172253.htm">Science Daily</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062666/robotic-repair-system-could-rescue-us-from-falling-satellites]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5062666/robotic-repair-system-could-rescue-us-from-falling-satellites]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ space junk ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ AASV ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Autonomous Space Servicing Vehicle ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ queens university ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Robots ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Satellites ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Space ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:40:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5062666&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
    
			</channel>
</rss>