<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Wga]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/wga</link>
		<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://gawker.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged Wga]]></description>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Squashes Windows 7 Crack After Just Two Days]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Microsoft Squashes Windows 7 Crack After Just Two Days" href="http://gizmodo.com/windows-7/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">windows7</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Microsoft Squashes Windows 7 Crack After Just Two Days" href="http://gizmodo.com/5327514/microsoft-squashes-windows-7-crack-after-just-two-days" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Microsoft Squashes Windows 7 Crack After Just Two Days" alt="Click here to read Microsoft Squashes Windows 7 Crack After Just Two Days" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2012/01/small_0f61f503c731ae8ba961629964f6ae72.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				OEM key cracks, like the one that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5325652/windows-7-rtm-cracked-what-took-so-long">broke Windows 7 wide open</a> just two days ago, are as old as Windows itself. But it looks like this one surfaced a <em>little</em> too early&mdash;and now it's <a href="http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/07/microsoft-blacklists-lenovos-leaked-windows-7-oem-key.ars">dead, dead, dead</a>.				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5327514/microsoft-squashes-windows-7-crack-after-just-two-days" title="Click here to read more about Microsoft Squashes Windows 7 Crack After Just Two Days">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5327514/microsoft-squashes-windows-7-crack-after-just-two-days]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5327514]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Oem key crack]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows 7 crack]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5327514&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 Will Annoy Pirates Even Less Than Vista]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Windows 7 Will Annoy Pirates Even Less Than Vista" href="http://gizmodo.com/windows-7/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">windows7</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Windows 7 Will Annoy Pirates Even Less Than Vista" href="http://gizmodo.com/5244086/windows-7-will-annoy-pirates-even-less-than-vista" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Windows 7 Will Annoy Pirates Even Less Than Vista" alt="Click here to read Windows 7 Will Annoy Pirates Even Less Than Vista" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2012/01/small_43e00449475013bf197124b29dca1642.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Microsoft really wants to make Windows 7 the least offensive OS ever. Case in point: They've made the  little dialog box that pesters you <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10234441-56.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20">into activating Windows less annoying</a>.				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5244086/windows-7-will-annoy-pirates-even-less-than-vista" title="Click here to read more about Windows 7 Will Annoy Pirates Even Less Than Vista">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5244086/windows-7-will-annoy-pirates-even-less-than-vista]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5244086]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows Genuine Advantage]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 07 May 2009 12:10:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5244086&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Chinese File Lawsuits Over Msoft's Piracy Crack Down]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Chinese File Lawsuits Over Msoft's Piracy Crack Down" href="http://gizmodo.com/piracy/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">piracy</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Chinese File Lawsuits Over Msoft's Piracy Crack Down" href="http://gizmodo.com/5071836/chinese-file-lawsuits-over-msofts-piracy-crack-down" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Chinese File Lawsuits Over Msoft's Piracy Crack Down" alt="Click here to read Chinese File Lawsuits Over Msoft's Piracy Crack Down" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/wga_03.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				 As expected, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5067539/microsoft-cracking-down-on-pirated-software-in-china-probably-starting-wwiii">Microsoft's controversial anti-piracy programs</a> have raised a big fuss in China, where a good amount of companies are probably using not-so-legal versions of Windows on all their work computers. One Beijing lawyer made a submission to the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, suggesting a $1 billion fine for what he called “illegal measures to deal with [piracy].” The government said it was looking into it.				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5071836/chinese-file-lawsuits-over-msofts-piracy-crack-down" title="Click here to read more about Chinese File Lawsuits Over Msoft's Piracy Crack Down">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5071836/chinese-file-lawsuits-over-msofts-piracy-crack-down]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5071836]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Anti-piracy measures]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Counterfeit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Nagware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows Genuine Advantage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows XP Professional]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elaine Chow]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5071836&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Cracking Down On Pirated Software in China, Probably Starting WWIII]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Microsoft Cracking Down On Pirated Software in China, Probably Starting WWIII" href="http://gizmodo.com/piracy/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">piracy</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Microsoft Cracking Down On Pirated Software in China, Probably Starting WWIII" href="http://gizmodo.com/5067539/microsoft-cracking-down-on-pirated-software-in-china-probably-starting-wwiii" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Microsoft Cracking Down On Pirated Software in China, Probably Starting WWIII" alt="Click here to read Microsoft Cracking Down On Pirated Software in China, Probably Starting WWIII" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/wga_03.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Microsoft has expanded its latest WGA initiative &mdash; you know, the one that turns your <strike>computer off</strike> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5042195/microsoft-upgrades-its-nagware-for-windows-xp">screen black</a> every hour</a> &mdash; to China. An guess what! Since the majority of Chinese computer users run unauthorized copies of Windows, they're <em>kind of upset</em>. Of course, there are plenty of good discussions to be had about how measures like this could affect Microsoft's image and limit computer access in poorer parts of the world, but one awesome Chinese blogger/aspiring economist sees things differently:				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5067539/microsoft-cracking-down-on-pirated-software-in-china-probably-starting-wwiii" title="Click here to read more about Microsoft Cracking Down On Pirated Software in China, Probably Starting WWIII">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5067539/microsoft-cracking-down-on-pirated-software-in-china-probably-starting-wwiii]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5067539]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows Genuine Advantage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:20:33 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5067539&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Upgrades Its Nagware For Windows XP]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Microsoft Upgrades Its Nagware For Windows XP" href="http://gizmodo.com/windows-xp/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">windowsxp</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Microsoft Upgrades Its Nagware For Windows XP" href="http://gizmodo.com/5042195/microsoft-upgrades-its-nagware-for-windows-xp" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Microsoft Upgrades Its Nagware For Windows XP" alt="Click here to read Microsoft Upgrades Its Nagware For Windows XP" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2008/08/wga.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				MJF at ZDNet reports that Microsoft is slowly rolling out a new version of Windows Genuine Advantage for Windows XP Professional in the next few months that's going to change the way it nags about using pirated versions. Instead of the kill switch, which was in Vista, the XP versions that WGA decides are "non-genuine" will pop up a message that looks like the one above. On the one hand, this is annoying, but on the other hand, it's just nagware and not a kill switch. If you're smart enough to pirate XP, you're smart enough to figure out how to find a crack to disable this. [<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1553">ZDnet</a>] 				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5042195/microsoft-upgrades-its-nagware-for-windows-xp" title="Click here to read more about Microsoft Upgrades Its Nagware For Windows XP">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5042195/microsoft-upgrades-its-nagware-for-windows-xp]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5042195]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Nagware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows Genuine Advantage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows xp nagware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5042195&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Striking Writers Form Online Video Company Visual Artists, I Still Want New "Heroes"]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Striking Writers Form Online Video Company Visual Artists, I Still Want New &quot;Heroes&quot;" href="http://gizmodo.com/wga-strikes-back/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">wgastrikesback</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Striking Writers Form Online Video Company Visual Artists, I Still Want New &quot;Heroes&quot;" href="http://gizmodo.com/344497/striking-writers-form-online-video-company-visual-artists-i-still-want-new-heroes" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Striking Writers Form Online Video Company Visual Artists, I Still Want New &quot;Heroes&quot;" alt="Click here to read Striking Writers Form Online Video Company Visual Artists, I Still Want New &quot;Heroes&quot;" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2008/01/small_godhelpus.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Led by the writer of <em>Air Bud</em> (that bodes well), a large posse of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/jerkfaces/producers-say-the-strike-has-cost-writers-106-millionand-counting-333251.php">out-of-work</a> WGAers is looking to launch the online video company, Visual Arists, later this year with over $30 million in funding with Silicon Valley types. Supposedly a bunch of A-listers are on board, which gives small hope that they punch out fare along the lines of name-checked <em>Juno</em> and <em>The Office</em>. 				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/344497/striking-writers-form-online-video-company-visual-artists-i-still-want-new-heroes" title="Click here to read more about Striking Writers Form Online Video Company Visual Artists, I Still Want New "Heroes"">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/344497/striking-writers-form-online-video-company-visual-artists-i-still-want-new-heroes]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-344497]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[WGA strikes back]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Home Entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Portable Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Writers strike]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:45:54 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=344497&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Letterman's Company First to Reach WGA Agreement]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Letterman's Company First to Reach WGA Agreement" href="http://gizmodo.com/televisions-get-television/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">televisionsgettelevision</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Letterman's Company First to Reach WGA Agreement" href="http://gizmodo.com/338891/lettermans-company-first-to-reach-wga-agreement" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Letterman's Company First to Reach WGA Agreement" alt="Click here to read Letterman's Company First to Reach WGA Agreement" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2007/12/small_iheartletterman-web.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				David Letterman's production company Worldwide Pants is&mdash;we believe&mdash;the first to reach an agreement with the Writers Guild of America for internet royalties. Since The Late Show and The Late Late Show are owned, not by CBS but Letterman's own company, the show was able to circumvent CBS negotiations altogether and settle with the WGA without setting major broadcast-wide precedents. 				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/338891/lettermans-company-first-to-reach-wga-agreement" title="Click here to read more about Letterman's Company First to Reach WGA Agreement">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/338891/lettermans-company-first-to-reach-wga-agreement]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-338891]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[televisions get television]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[David Letterman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[worldwide pants]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Writers' Strike]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 29 Dec 2007 11:19:43 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=338891&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Patent Copies Windows Genuine Advantage DRM: Will It Be Just as Annoying?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Apple Patent Copies Windows Genuine Advantage DRM: Will It Be Just as Annoying?" href="http://gizmodo.com/apple/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">apple</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Apple Patent Copies Windows Genuine Advantage DRM: Will It Be Just as Annoying?" href="http://gizmodo.com/337879/apple-patent-copies-windows-genuine-advantage-drm-will-it-be-just-as-annoying" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Apple Patent Copies Windows Genuine Advantage DRM: Will It Be Just as Annoying?" alt="Click here to read Apple Patent Copies Windows Genuine Advantage DRM: Will It Be Just as Annoying?" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2007/12/small_validatedick.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Most people are familiar with Microsoft's <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINDOWS GENUINE ADVANTAGE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-genuine-advantage/">Windows Genuine Advantage</a> program&mdash;whenever you have to "validate" Windows, that's WGA in action. Since there is no copy protection on <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged OS X" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/os-x/">OS X</a>, lifelong Mac users might be unfamiliar with this whole idea. Don't worry, it looks like you might get acquainted real soon! Apple has a new patent called "Run-Time Code Injection To Perform Checks" (sounds cold and medical, no?), that's pretty much <em>exactly</em> like WGA. And it's all because you've been breaking promises to Apple!				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/337879/apple-patent-copies-windows-genuine-advantage-drm-will-it-be-just-as-annoying" title="Click here to read more about Apple Patent Copies Windows Genuine Advantage DRM: Will It Be Just as Annoying?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/337879/apple-patent-copies-windows-genuine-advantage-drm-will-it-be-just-as-annoying]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-337879]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Drm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Os X]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows Genuine Advantage]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 26 Dec 2007 19:00:28 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=337879&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Daily Show and Colbert Report Return Jan. 7, Sans Striking Writers]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The Daily Show and Colbert Report Return Jan. 7, Sans Striking Writers" href="http://gizmodo.com/ballsy/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">ballsy</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The Daily Show and Colbert Report Return Jan. 7, Sans Striking Writers" href="http://gizmodo.com/336945/the-daily-show-and-colbert-report-return-jan-7-sans-striking-writers" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The Daily Show and Colbert Report Return Jan. 7, Sans Striking Writers" alt="Click here to read The Daily Show and Colbert Report Return Jan. 7, Sans Striking Writers" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2007/12/small_colbertstewart.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Like late-night white knights, Jon Stewart and Colbert are returning to save us from rerun/reality TV/web <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/off-air/your-writers-strike-tv-guide-330168.php">purgatory </a>on Jan. 7&mdash;the news has been the exact same <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/jerkfaces/producers-say-the-strike-has-cost-writers-106-millionand-counting-333251.php">for weeks</a>, right? But they won't have an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/brothers-in-arms/giz-wants-to-give-work-to-striking-wga-members-331065.php">army of writers</a> to make sure every word out of their mouth kills, so we'll see just how much funny naturally spills out of their brains. I have faith, do you? [<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/21/the-daily-show-and-colbert-decide-to-wing-it-without-writers/">TechCrunch</a>]				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/336945/the-daily-show-and-colbert-report-return-jan-7-sans-striking-writers" title="Click here to read more about The Daily Show and Colbert Report Return Jan. 7, Sans Striking Writers">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/336945/the-daily-show-and-colbert-report-return-jan-7-sans-striking-writers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-336945]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Ballsy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Colbert Report]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Daily Show]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Home Entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Writers strike]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:00:20 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=336945&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Producers Say the Strike Has Cost Writers $106 Million...and Counting]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Producers Say the Strike Has Cost Writers $106 Million...and Counting" href="http://gizmodo.com/jerkfaces/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">jerkfaces</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Producers Say the Strike Has Cost Writers $106 Million...and Counting" href="http://gizmodo.com/333251/producers-say-the-strike-has-cost-writers-106-millionand-counting" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Producers Say the Strike Has Cost Writers $106 Million...and Counting" alt="Click here to read Producers Say the Strike Has Cost Writers $106 Million...and Counting" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2007/12/small_cagey.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers has a fun new flash widget on their site with a running tally of how much income the writers have dropped into a black hole since <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/solidarity/the-wga-strike-and-the-death-of-television-322068.php">the strike</a> started. Right now, it's at about $106 million. Kind of a dick move if you ask us, since producers <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/scrooged/250-flat-fee-producers-offer-writers-guild-for-internet-distribution-is-way-lame-still-screws-writers-328732.php">trying to screw writers</a> is why they're at impasse. Besides, writers stand to lose a lot more if they let producers slime their way out of fair compensation deals for new media and internet distribution. Hey writers! If you need some cash in the meantime and don't have Aflac, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/brothers-in-arms/giz-wants-to-give-work-to-striking-wga-members-331065.php">talk to us</a>. [<a href="http://www.amptp.org/">AMPTP</a>]				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/333251/producers-say-the-strike-has-cost-writers-106-millionand-counting" title="Click here to read more about Producers Say the Strike Has Cost Writers $106 Million...and Counting">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/333251/producers-say-the-strike-has-cost-writers-106-millionand-counting]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-333251]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Jerkfaces]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Home Entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Writers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Writers strike]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:20:34 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=333251&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Giz Wants to Give Work to Striking WGA Members]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Giz Wants to Give Work to Striking WGA Members" href="http://gizmodo.com/brothers-in-arms/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">brothersinarms</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Giz Wants to Give Work to Striking WGA Members" href="http://gizmodo.com/331065/giz-wants-to-give-work-to-striking-wga-members" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Giz Wants to Give Work to Striking WGA Members" alt="Click here to read Giz Wants to Give Work to Striking WGA Members" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2007/12/small_writers1.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Hey, TV writers! Yeah, you <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/solidarity/the-wga-strike-and-the-death-of-television-322068.php">awesome folks on strike</a>. I'm talking to you. Are you sick of not writing? And not getting paid as a result of not writing? It's understandable. Well, we here at Gizmodo want to help you help us help you (help us). 				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/331065/giz-wants-to-give-work-to-striking-wga-members" title="Click here to read more about Giz Wants to Give Work to Striking WGA Members">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/331065/giz-wants-to-give-work-to-striking-wga-members]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-331065]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[brothers in arms]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 07 Dec 2007 09:30:33 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=331065&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Your Writers Strike TV Guide]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Your Writers Strike TV Guide" href="http://gizmodo.com/off-air/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">offair</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Your Writers Strike TV Guide" href="http://gizmodo.com/330168/your-writers-strike-tv-guide" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Your Writers Strike TV Guide" alt="Click here to read Your Writers Strike TV Guide" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2007/12/small_STRIKETV.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				
With the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/solidarity/the-wga-strike-and-the-death-of-television-322068.php">WGA writers strike in full swing</a>, we're sure that some families are going hungry. And the subsequent complete staff layoffs are a miserable by-product of corporate greed. But the biggest losers? Those without <strike>health insurance</strike> anything to watch on their 50-inch flatscreen televisions...those who could hear a pin drop over the silence of their surround sound. Here's a rundown of how many of our favorite shows are left (along with several that are dead in the water):				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/330168/your-writers-strike-tv-guide" title="Click here to read more about Your Writers Strike TV Guide">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/330168/your-writers-strike-tv-guide]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-330168]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[off air]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Writers strike]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 05 Dec 2007 09:48:29 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=330168&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Pirates Stealing XP Twice as Much as Vista, Microsoft Doesn't Know How to Feel]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Pirates Stealing XP Twice as Much as Vista, Microsoft Doesn't Know How to Feel" href="http://gizmodo.com/piracy/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">piracy</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Pirates Stealing XP Twice as Much as Vista, Microsoft Doesn't Know How to Feel" href="http://gizmodo.com/329794/pirates-stealing-xp-twice-as-much-as-vista-microsoft-doesnt-know-how-to-feel" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Pirates Stealing XP Twice as Much as Vista, Microsoft Doesn't Know How to Feel" alt="Click here to read Pirates Stealing XP Twice as Much as Vista, Microsoft Doesn't Know How to Feel" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2007/12/small_wingenadvantage.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				So here's a good news/bad news situation for Microsoft. The good news is that people aren't pirating Vista as much as XP. The bad news is that people are pirating XP twice as much, meaning that even when given a choice between each for free, people are sticking with trusty old XP. They can't even get people to <i>steal</i> Vista, right?! Well, not really. 				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/329794/pirates-stealing-xp-twice-as-much-as-vista-microsoft-doesnt-know-how-to-feel" title="Click here to read more about Pirates Stealing XP Twice as Much as Vista, Microsoft Doesn't Know How to Feel">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/329794/pirates-stealing-xp-twice-as-much-as-vista-microsoft-doesnt-know-how-to-feel]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-329794]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:25:45 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=329794&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[$250 Flat Fee Producers Offer Writers Guild for Internet Distribution Is Way Lame, Still Screws Writers]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read $250 Flat Fee Producers Offer Writers Guild for Internet Distribution Is Way Lame, Still Screws Writers" href="http://gizmodo.com/scrooged/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">scrooged</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read $250 Flat Fee Producers Offer Writers Guild for Internet Distribution Is Way Lame, Still Screws Writers" href="http://gizmodo.com/328732/250-flat-fee-producers-offer-writers-guild-for-internet-distribution-is-way-lame-still-screws-writers" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read $250 Flat Fee Producers Offer Writers Guild for Internet Distribution Is Way Lame, Still Screws Writers" alt="Click here to read $250 Flat Fee Producers Offer Writers Guild for Internet Distribution Is Way Lame, Still Screws Writers" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2007/11/small_dealnodeal.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The Writers Guild <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/solidarity/the-wga-strike-and-the-death-of-television-322068.php">strike</a> languishes on: <em>Heroes</em> ends for the year next week. In a bid to end <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/video-wars/tv-on-your-pc-hulu-joost-and-miro-reviewed-323787.php">our suffering</a>, the producers' trade group has made a "groundbreaking" offer to the Writers Guild, grandiosely titled the "New Economic Partnership." The deal's a mind-blowing less-than $250 flat fee for an hour-long show to be re-broadcast on the internet for up to a year. If you recall, internet distribution's sort of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/unfortunate/digital-distribution-tangling-up-writers-guild-of-america-talks-strike-looms-317597.php">sticking point</a> and writers asked for 2.5 percent of the "distributors' gross revenue." Let us count the ways writers get screwed by the producers' Scrooge-y offer. 				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/328732/250-flat-fee-producers-offer-writers-guild-for-internet-distribution-is-way-lame-still-screws-writers" title="Click here to read more about $250 Flat Fee Producers Offer Writers Guild for Internet Distribution Is Way Lame, Still Screws Writers">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/328732/250-flat-fee-producers-offer-writers-guild-for-internet-distribution-is-way-lame-still-screws-writers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-328732]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[scrooged]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Digital Downloads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Home Entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Portable Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Writers Guild of America]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Writers strike]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:30:05 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=328732&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Video of Studio Execs Bragging About the Internet Cash Cow]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				Yesterday, I wrote a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/solidarity/the-wga-strike-and-the-death-of-television-322068.php">feature on the WGA strike</a> that quoted the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers as saying that, while the internet was great for promotional purposes, "there is not enough marketplace data to judge its true potential, ultimate impact on traditional media or viability as a business." Oh, so I guess they haven't been making any money off the internet and didn't have any plans to in the future then? Check out this video of a bunch of studio and network honchos bragging about how much coin they were planning on raking in from the internet, then get a little bit more cynical about the entertainment industry. Come on, greedy studios. Give the writers a fair deal.				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/322522/video-of-studio-execs-bragging-about-the-internet-cash-cow" title="Click here to read more about Video of Studio Execs Bragging About the Internet Cash Cow">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/322522/video-of-studio-execs-bragging-about-the-internet-cash-cow]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-322522]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Weasels]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Home Entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[WGA Strike]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:55:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=322522&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The WGA Strike and the Death of Television]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				<br   />				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/322068/the-wga-strike-and-the-death-of-television" title="Click here to read more about The WGA Strike and the Death of Television">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/322068/the-wga-strike-and-the-death-of-television]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-322068]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[solidarity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[WGA Strike]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:30:35 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=322068&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Digital Distribution Tangling Up Writers Guild of America Talks, Strike Looms]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Digital Distribution Tangling Up Writers Guild of America Talks, Strike Looms" href="http://gizmodo.com/unfortunate/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">unfortunate</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Digital Distribution Tangling Up Writers Guild of America Talks, Strike Looms" href="http://gizmodo.com/317597/digital-distribution-tangling-up-writers-guild-of-america-talks-strike-looms" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Digital Distribution Tangling Up Writers Guild of America Talks, Strike Looms" alt="Click here to read Digital Distribution Tangling Up Writers Guild of America Talks, Strike Looms" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2007/11/small_heroeshulu.png"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				In case you were unawares, the contract between Hollywood producers and the Writers Guild of America was supposed to expire <a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5ijKZ3ZLkv_kJaBO9JFeMK9Sjym0g">a few hours ago</a>, leading to a possible strike, meaning <a href="http://www.aintitcool.com/node/34636">bad things</a> could happen. One of the major issues is digital content and distribution&mdash;after getting screwed over by the terms of how they were paid from video and DVD, set many moons ago, they're leery of losing out on tons of cash yet again. Since a multitude of content is going online in an infinitude of formats&mdash;web-exclusive content, full episode replays, ARG, etc. on network websites, iTunes and the works&mdash;the terms are inevitably just as complicated. Right now, writers only get coin if a viewer pays to see the goods, making ad-supported Hulu, for instance, a black hole for them no matter how many users tune in. 				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/317597/digital-distribution-tangling-up-writers-guild-of-america-talks-strike-looms" title="Click here to read more about Digital Distribution Tangling Up Writers Guild of America Talks, Strike Looms">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/317597/digital-distribution-tangling-up-writers-guild-of-america-talks-strike-looms]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-317597]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[unfortunate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Digital Distribution]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Home Entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video download]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Writers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Writers Guild of America]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:15:16 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=317597&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Internet Explorer 7 Marketshare Lagging, WGA Check Going Away]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Internet Explorer 7 Marketshare Lagging, WGA Check Going Away" href="http://gizmodo.com/software/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">software</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Internet Explorer 7 Marketshare Lagging, WGA Check Going Away" href="http://gizmodo.com/307769/internet-explorer-7-marketshare-lagging-wga-check-going-away" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Internet Explorer 7 Marketshare Lagging, WGA Check Going Away" alt="Click here to read Internet Explorer 7 Marketshare Lagging, WGA Check Going Away" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2007/10/small_firefox_eats_ie.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Despite the fact that IE7 ships with every copy of Vista and is a free download for every Windows XP user, the browser only has a marketshare of 20-27 percent. Contrast that with <a href="http://www.e-janco.com/browser.htm">Firefox's 17%</a> share, according to one site, and things are looking dour for Microsoft. So what do they do? No, not improve the browser. They remove the WGA check on the download, which previously required users to have a legit copy of Windows XP before installing. Is this going to dramatically increase usage? We'll see. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071004-seeking-market-share-microsoft-removes-wga-anti-piracy-check-from-ie7.html">Ars Technica</a>]				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/307769/internet-explorer-7-marketshare-lagging-wga-check-going-away" title="Click here to read more about Internet Explorer 7 Marketshare Lagging, WGA Check Going Away">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/307769/internet-explorer-7-marketshare-lagging-wga-check-going-away]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-307769]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Authentication]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[IE7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:40:28 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=307769&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple's 10.4.7 Update Also Phones Home]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Apple's 10.4.7 Update Also Phones Home" href="http://gizmodo.com/software/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">software</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Apple's 10.4.7 Update Also Phones Home" href="http://gizmodo.com/185596/apples-1047-update-also-phones-home" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Apple's 10.4.7 Update Also Phones Home" alt="Click here to read Apple's 10.4.7 Update Also Phones Home" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2006/07/dashboardanim.gif"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				
        <div class="FloatHack"></div>
    
    

      Sort of innocuous in the grand scheme of things, the new update from Apple adds a widget verification program. This program verifies whether the widgets present in the dashboard is authentic by sending an HTTP GET command to Apple's servers every eight hours. 				<a href="http://gizmodo.com/185596/apples-1047-update-also-phones-home" title="Click here to read more about Apple's 10.4.7 Update Also Phones Home">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/185596/apples-1047-update-also-phones-home]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-185596]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dashboard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wga]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 06 Jul 2006 16:43:16 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=185596&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

