<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Mac Pro vs. PowerMac: How much faster is it? - Gizmodo Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:25:00 EDT]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:25:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pcs/mac-pro-vs-powermac-how-much-faster-is-it-195305.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Mac Pro vs. PowerMac: How much faster is it?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pcs/mac-pro-vs-powermac-how-much-faster-is-it-195305.php#c369849]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Perhaps the more interesting thing is that the earlier Anandtech article priced the Mac Pro as basically as cheap as building it yourself (the price difference was about $100, and the DIY box didn't include a case or power supply (we'll ignore OS, since if you want XP, you'll have to buy it for both machines)).</p>
<p>
Nevermind how much the Dell cost (not "twice as much", but almost $1k more). Apple seems intent on shattering the "Mac Tax" myth. Sure it's a lot more computer than you need, but the premium overhead is negative in this respect...</p> <p>Worf</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Worf]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:195305:c369849]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:25:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Mac Pro vs. PowerMac: How much faster is it?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pcs/mac-pro-vs-powermac-how-much-faster-is-it-195305.php#c368569]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<i>It's definitely faster as long as you're not using Rosetta to run non-universal binary applications.</i></p>
<p>
Gee, I never would have guessed that it would be slower when emulating a completely different architecture for really obvious fucking reasons!</p> <p>dalziel_86</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[dalziel_86]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:195305:c368569]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 20 Aug 2006 03:10:46 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Mac Pro vs. PowerMac: How much faster is it?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pcs/mac-pro-vs-powermac-how-much-faster-is-it-195305.php#c367790]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Here's a slight hint to some Intel Core Duo performance vs Power PC. My PPC 2x1.8 G5 powermac (with a GeforceFX 5200 video card) chugged along at about 15FPS in Myst V. My Core Duo 1.8ghz iMac, with a Radeon x1600 running Myst V *under PPC translation* ran the same speed. </p>
<p>
This meaningless benchmark brought to you by... something.</p> <p><a href="http://www.manachine.com/">HawkWolf</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[HawkWolf]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:195305:c367790]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:32:33 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Mac Pro vs. PowerMac: How much faster is it?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pcs/mac-pro-vs-powermac-how-much-faster-is-it-195305.php#c367788]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
&gt; Quad-Core (two processors, each dual core)</p>
<p>
Is that official terminology?  Wouldn't it be dual dual-core, or something like that since any month now true 'quad-core' will be coming out?</p>
<p>
Seriously -- I don't know the answer.  Just asking so I can look real cool at those geek OK Cola parties.</p> <p><a href="http://www.sanitypages.com/">Monty</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monty]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:195305:c367788]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:31:34 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Mac Pro vs. PowerMac: How much faster is it?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pcs/mac-pro-vs-powermac-how-much-faster-is-it-195305.php#c367778]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
FlashSandbox:</p>
<p>
I might when my PowerBook becomes second fiddle to the Mac Pro I'll be getting within the next couple of weeks.  Not that I need to; even in Rosetta, the Pro should thoroughly trounce my G4.</p> <p><a href="http://www.richardgarfinkel.com">Darklighter</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darklighter]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:195305:c367778]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:18:13 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Mac Pro vs. PowerMac: How much faster is it?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pcs/mac-pro-vs-powermac-how-much-faster-is-it-195305.php#c367742]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>
If someone wants to give me $3k, I'll compare the Mac Pro to a dual 1GHz G4.</P>
<P>
Once Adobe flips over to universal binaries (CS3, no doubt) then it'll be perfect for everyone. But I think that going from a G4 to a Mac Pro would be a slight bump up, no?</P>
<P>
Anyone done any G4 vs Intel tests?</P> <p><a href="http://FlashSandbox.com">FlashSandbox</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[FlashSandbox]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:195305:c367742]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:55:10 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>