<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[More Vacuum Tubery: Vincent Audio Headphone Amp - Gizmodo Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:08:46 EDT]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:08:46 EDT]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/more-vacuum-tubery-vincent-audio-headphone-amp-214707.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[More Vacuum Tubery: Vincent Audio Headphone Amp]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/more-vacuum-tubery-vincent-audio-headphone-amp-214707.php#c1316626]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Hi Folks, I bought the Vincent amp, the one with only one output jack, and slightly cheaper.. same exact specs though.. and it was a black case, not the fancy silver one, which btw doesnt offer the data usb port any more.. it used to advertize that as a way to be more lossless if the cable went direct from your computer to your Ipod.. for any one trying this out for the first time.. here's a reminder that they dont always mention until you have all the instructions in your lapbook's instructions.. you have hook up to your amp or avr with rca jacks. from the record out jack.. here's the hang! any thing you wanna listen to thru the AVR-VIA the record out to the HP amp has to be connected to your AVR with analog cables to the HP amp or the record out gives off a very scrambled audio output.. hence all those optical lines you spent so much on, will all need to be backed up with expensive interconnect cable, hopefully your AVR will allow both, so you wont be switching out the cables a lot..heehehe  be sure to return to your optical in after you're done recording cus those cables can cause a lot of  unshielded hum Im told</p>
<p>
Let's start with the amp.. It had no where near the volume i needed to enjoy any ting at all, even my wife who hates loud music had it turned up to the max and was still wanting more.. i could see her pressing the cups to her head for more volume, i couldn't believe what i was seeing..<br />
 The Amp was very clean sounding, ill give it that much, but for me, that's not enough, i like loud! and no distortion, were it's not called for anyway!<br />
I had emailed the ppl at Vincent .. they assured me it had loads of volume, i couldnt find it. and i was using a very good headphone. the Grado's GS 1000's admittedly before the entire 100 hour burn-in time they say is needed..  it never came close to what i require in a set of headphones.. i guess it may have been the open ear thing.. That being said, i returned the Grado GS 1000's I just dont think you need to spend 1000 bux US on a set of headphones.. Prove it to me first, but they couldnt do that considering the "burn-in" test!<br />
 i like isolation when under the cups.. its how i escape, thats sorta hard to do with the noise of screaming dogs and kids outside thinkin' their funny, so i got no escape at all .. just some music with the unwanted noise ALL still there! If you're looking for a very good HP amp stick with the American company ray samuels audio</p>
<p>
"http://www.raysamuelsaudio.com/index2.html<br />
not cheap, but get what you pay for!</p>
<p>
Nibbler<br />
</p> <p>NIbbler</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[NIbbler]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:214707:c1316626]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:08:46 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[More Vacuum Tubery: Vincent Audio Headphone Amp]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/more-vacuum-tubery-vincent-audio-headphone-amp-214707.php#c638653]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Ha Ha.  I bought a set of Vincent hybrid amps- a preamp and two monoblocks that listed for 3500 Euros a few years ago...<br />
except I bought them from the actual Chinese manufacturer, ShengYa audio, and only paid about 600USD  Vincent has since gotten pissed at ShengYa for selling the same design for a vastly lower price, so they just changed the faceplates on the amps.</p>
<p>
They are great amplifiers, but if you like headphone amps, make the effort to find a Hong Kong distributor on the  internet and I'll bet you can find it for 200 dollars or less.</p>
<p>
As far as I know, Vincent makes NO modifications to these ShengYa products, they just change the name and mark them up.  I don't think they even design them...</p>
<p>
As for the tube versus solid state debate, besides the tube issue, these amps tend to be handmade, and therefore of a better quality(debateable), and the TRANSFORMERS are typically of a higher quality, helping to stabilize the signal.  Thats why they are so heavy...</p> <p>agedrien</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[agedrien]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:214707:c638653]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:33:45 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[More Vacuum Tubery: Vincent Audio Headphone Amp]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/more-vacuum-tubery-vincent-audio-headphone-amp-214707.php#c633355]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Roxstar: I use the ER6s with my iPod mini, but I also use them for in-ear monitoring, so I bought the higher impedence "flat" ones instead of the enhanced, white ER6i aimed at the iPod market.</p>
<p>
Got round the impedence problem by building a little headphone amp in an altoids tin. Runs out of the line out on the iPod (bypassing the crappy internal amp with its badly chosen, high-pass filter inducing capacitors), and sounds wonderful. Cost me about £30 in total!</p> <p>budward</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[budward]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:214707:c633355]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:22:39 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[More Vacuum Tubery: Vincent Audio Headphone Amp]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/more-vacuum-tubery-vincent-audio-headphone-amp-214707.php#c632570]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Ok, let me explain a few things here regarding tubes and music.</p>
<p>
Roxstar, saying that tubes are not good for fast, bass-driven, or rock music is silly.  Take a hard look at most of the bands recording this music-  the majority of them use tube amps, and the studio they recorded in more than likely used tube preamps as well.  </p>
<p>
The difference in sound isn't an "ear" thing, it's a physical and sonic reality.  Tubes don't "clip" like MOSFETs do.  For example, my 130 watt Fender Ultimate Chorus guitar amp is solid state, and will only put out a max of 130 watts continuous, no matter how high I have the volume.  If my guitar signal is really hot, the master volume stops working at about 8 on the dial, raising the volume from 8 to 10 makes no difference at all.  This is why solid state amps (and preamps) sound harsh......the sound wave is clipped off at the extreme ends, resulting in an almost square wave pattern.</p>
<p>
My Mesa Boogie Lonestar, however, does not clip.  In fact, when the volume is up at full blast, and I'm running a hot signal, the amp is actually putting out MORE than the 100 rated watts.  This headroom and lack of clipping results in a pure, round waveform, which is much more pleasing to the ears.  It doesn't "gate" itself, or distort unpleasantly at higher volumes......it just gets louder.  MOSFET amps cannot do this, ever.  There are some designs that sound close, but it's a feature of the circuitry and associated software, not of the MOSFETs themselves.</p>
<p>
While I agree, a tube-driven headphone amp is sortof like a fish with legs (and his own model of Nike sneakers), the reality is the sound will be much more pleasing, even if it is coming off of a solid state preamp, and even more so off of a digital connection.</p>
<p>
I use not only tube guitar amps, but my home studio also includes several tube mics, tube mic preamps, and tube-driven direct boxes.  This is not because "tubes are cool", but because they sound better, react better to audio signals, and record like butter.  And yes, this is on (sometimes) fast, heavy, bass-driven music.</p>
<p>
I use solid state headphone distribution amps, though, since I only do it for monitoring purposes.  This would be nice for a serious vocalist, though, who wanted to use it as a headphone monitor preamp for recording.</p> <p><a href="http://www.tweaknews.net">fussnfeathers</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[fussnfeathers]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:214707:c632570]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:07:49 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[More Vacuum Tubery: Vincent Audio Headphone Amp]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/more-vacuum-tubery-vincent-audio-headphone-amp-214707.php#c631991]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
HiFi,<br />
I did listen, and VTL tubes killed Meridian, Bryston, and Proceed solid state on piano, vocals, <i>and</i> rock.  It wasn't a "warmth" thing, just more musical to all three listeners.  But I know and respect people who prefer solid state amplification like Mark Levinson and Spectral (alas even more expensive).</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.headphone.com/products/headphone-amps/">Headroom</a> sells a hybrid tube headphone amp, but their $3000 and $4000 headphone amps (!!) are solid state.</p>
<p>
I'm not sure any Gizmodo editor cares about ultimate sound reproduction, it's just tired non-interactive mono-media that lost its cool in the 80s.  C'mon, post your system components!</p> <p><a href="http://www.skierpage.com/">skierpage</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[skierpage]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:214707:c631991]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:17:09 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[More Vacuum Tubery: Vincent Audio Headphone Amp]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/more-vacuum-tubery-vincent-audio-headphone-amp-214707.php#c631567]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
People bashing tubes probably haven't listened to any and/or can't afford 'em. Try it first, kids, then get back to me. </p>
<p>
Not good on rock, bass, or electronic music? Must be listening to crappy and/or poorly matched gear. Anything that can faithfully reproduce the scale, subtleties and dynamics of large-scale classical music can do anything, thank you very much. </p> <p>HiFi</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[HiFi]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:214707:c631567]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Nov 2006 18:04:24 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[More Vacuum Tubery: Vincent Audio Headphone Amp]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/more-vacuum-tubery-vincent-audio-headphone-amp-214707.php#c630753]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
shoot. forgot to mention:</p>
<p>
You left out the part about how this can be used as a Preamp in a larger system and that it's not a true tube amp. It's a tube/transistor hybrid and has class A circuitry. </p> <p>Roxstar</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roxstar]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:214707:c630753]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:55:14 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[More Vacuum Tubery: Vincent Audio Headphone Amp]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/more-vacuum-tubery-vincent-audio-headphone-amp-214707.php#c630723]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
there are a lot of headphones that cannot be sufficiently driven by portable devices. Take the HD-650 for example. You don't necessarily need tubes (that's a personal taste decision), but you will need an amp. But if you bought the HD-650, odds are you might want a high end amp too and $800 isn't unreasonable for such a setup. On the otherhand, if you are only using it for your 128kbps MP3s, I highly advise you against anything but the earbuds that come with the IPOD. </p>
<p>
Intestingly, the ER4 (in ear canal) headphones are too hard to drive for an IPOD as well. I believe an IPOD is about portability so rather than buy an amp, I bought the ER4P which are lower impedence and designed for portable devices. </p>
<p>
FWIW, tubes are not considered better by anyone. They are considered preferable by certain people who prefer the characteristics of tubes to solid state amplification. But there are just as many audiophiles devoted to the sound of solid state amps as tubes. Tubes are not as good for fast, rock, bassy, or electronic music. They are excellent for accoustic tracks though. </p> <p>Roxstar</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roxstar]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:214707:c630723]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:50:57 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[More Vacuum Tubery: Vincent Audio Headphone Amp]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/more-vacuum-tubery-vincent-audio-headphone-amp-214707.php#c630349]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
>>this isn't a preamp,<br />
it can be</p>
<p>
>>it is amplifying an already heavily processed (usaully) signal<br />
not necessarily</p>
<p>
>>Any high end audio equipment that would have a signal of a high enough quality to deserve a vacuum tube treatment is already going to be loud enough through headphones to satisfy anyone. <br />
this isn't the point of a headphone amp</p>
<p>
>>Vacuum tubes will not make audio sound better, it will however give it a volume boost without making it sound any worse.<br />
This is just wrong. Tubes change the harmonic distortion of the signal which changes the sound considerably.  Many people consider this changed distortion better.  Solid state can go as loud as tubes with less 'loss' in the signal.</p> <p>jessedybka</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[jessedybka]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:214707:c630349]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:56:22 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[More Vacuum Tubery: Vincent Audio Headphone Amp]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/more-vacuum-tubery-vincent-audio-headphone-amp-214707.php#c630310]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I know nothin' about tube amps. But in theory, I would guess the "warm" analog tube processing anywhere in the chain might affect the sound in a pleasurable way for the user (regardless of source quality, regardless of whether the tubes are in the the pre-amp or amp.)</p>
<p>
Okay experts, go ahead and tear my up.</p> <p><a href="http://liquidsoapdispenser.com/">liquidsoapdispenser</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[liquidsoapdispenser]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:214707:c630310]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:52:32 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[More Vacuum Tubery: Vincent Audio Headphone Amp]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/more-vacuum-tubery-vincent-audio-headphone-amp-214707.php#c630266]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
this isn't a preamp, it is amplifying an already heavily processed (usaully) signal.  Any high end audio equipment that would have a signal of a high enough quality to deserve a vacuum tube treatment is already going to be loud enough through headphones to satisfy anyone.  Vacuum tubes will not make audio sound better, it will however give it a volume boost without making it sound any worse.</p> <p>illiniguy</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[illiniguy]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:214707:c630266]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:46:25 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[More Vacuum Tubery: Vincent Audio Headphone Amp]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/more-vacuum-tubery-vincent-audio-headphone-amp-214707.php#c630176]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Agreed - 800 bucks for a headphone amp is probably overkill, but why the bagging on tube amps?  I'm pretty sure that most high-end professional musicians and setups actually prefer tubes because of the sound.  There's quite a lot of musicians that pony up for tube amps.</p> <p><a href="http://www.fiestyturtles.com/pete">edmicman</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[edmicman]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:214707:c630176]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:34:41 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[More Vacuum Tubery: Vincent Audio Headphone Amp]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/more-vacuum-tubery-vincent-audio-headphone-amp-214707.php#c630166]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Why the headphone hate? Gizmodo has certainly noticed before that headphone audiophilia exists... the simple truth is that it's no different from normal audiophiles, except that proportionally it's waaay cheaper than a speaker rig for the quality that can be extracted. (and doesn't piss off your neighbors) :)</p> <p>devwild</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[devwild]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:214707:c630166]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:33:15 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[More Vacuum Tubery: Vincent Audio Headphone Amp]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/more-vacuum-tubery-vincent-audio-headphone-amp-214707.php#c630006]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
tube preamplication makes just about anything sound better.</p>
<p>
it's definitely NOT an outdated technology.</p>
<p>
Check out any of the highend preamps in a recording studio and they will all have tubes. The same goes for guitar amps, microphones.....etc...</p>
<p>
<br />
not sure about this thing though. </p> <p>justpeak</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[justpeak]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:214707:c630006]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:10:27 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>