<![CDATA[Toshiba to Roll Out Cheaper HD DVD Players Next Week? - Gizmodo Comments]]> <![CDATA[Toshiba to Roll Out Cheaper HD DVD Players Next Week? - Gizmodo Comments]]> <![CDATA[Toshiba to Roll Out Cheaper HD DVD Players Next Week?]]> Bluray is superior because it holds more information is like saying a UPS truck is superior to a Honda Accord because it can hold more stuff. But oh geez, all I need is something to drive to work. Blu-ray might be the way to go for arbitrary data (read: Joliet dvd+rw replacement, gamme console content, etc), but not a commercial movie format when all you need is enough space for a 2.5 hour movie. Sony keeps making stuff 150% more advanced than anyone actually needs. So why pay for 150% when all you get to use is the first 100%?

mrAnderson

]]> <![CDATA[Toshiba to Roll Out Cheaper HD DVD Players Next Week?]]> uber_fragger has it right. Also, I think that both format devices are now on equal footing. Something about the latest fixes to HD-DVD players makes them do everything the others can do. I'll look further...

Penchum

]]> <![CDATA[Toshiba to Roll Out Cheaper HD DVD Players Next Week?]]> Worf: don't forget you can buy movies now that are HD-DVD on one side and DVD on the other, which is a huge advantage since people that aren't quite ready to make the jump can spend a few more bucks for an HD-DVD/DVD hybrid disc to play later if they get an HD-DVD player.

uber_fragger

]]> <![CDATA[Toshiba to Roll Out Cheaper HD DVD Players Next Week?]]> Blu-Ray - it's technically superior. But technically superior isn't a winner (Beta was superior to VHS, the Xbox is superior to the PS2 and GameCube, and so on). 25GB/50GB/more per disc. We'll probably see this as the optical data storage media of the future - if we can get our heads around the crap that is region encoding, disc fingerprints (which keeps BD-Rs from playing copyrighted/pressed BDs, for example), etc.

HD-DVD - it's inferior to Blu-Ray. Except in one key factor - price. DVD players took off when the price came tumbling down from $1000 to $200 to $100 and now they're a dime a dozen. HD-DVD's barely a year old and if the price continues to tumble. Blu-Ray prices have tumbled with the PS3. The HD-DVD itself is cheaper to produce because it's a tweak of the existing DVD process, so thus there's tons of capacity to produce HD-DVDs (and why HD-DVD/DVD "flippers" are trivial - the same plant can make them with minor upgrades). BDs require plant upgrades to produce them, plus certification.

No, the race is decided on content, like VHS vs. Beta. HD-DVD has the advantage that content will be cheaper to produce and consume. And apparently, until recently, the mastering tools were better, leading to better mastering and content on the HD-DVD versions of movies... but that should've been fixed by now, right?

Worf

]]> <![CDATA[Toshiba to Roll Out Cheaper HD DVD Players Next Week?]]> I'll tape the proceedings...

strider_mt2k

]]> <![CDATA[Toshiba to Roll Out Cheaper HD DVD Players Next Week?]]> Come on Blu-Ray... the gauntlet has been thrown!

huygir

]]> <![CDATA[Toshiba to Roll Out Cheaper HD DVD Players Next Week?]]> HD dvd players look prettier too....cheaper too...but I like blue ray cause of the 25 gig and 50 gig effect,.....but then again,...I dunnl...it'll take me another 2 years to get into HDDVD and BRDVD mode...I remember when I got into VCR mode.....took me forevger to find out how awsome DVD's are.

FROST1

]]>