<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy - Gizmodo Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:43:05 EST]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:43:05 EST]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c870393]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I can't understand why this relates to the iPhone at all... So Apple's forthcoming device doesn't support more than two touchpoints (or maybe it does - we don't know), but does that really matter?</p>
<p>
Can you really imagine using more than two fingers on such a small screen?  You certainly wouldn't do so for anything *useful*.  Come to think of it, these five-fingered demos I've seen have *never* included anything useful.</p>
<p>
Point is, the iPhone supports functionality appropriate to the iPhone; a very small device.  Larger devices probably *should* support more fingers for... whatever application they're sure to eventually come up with.</p> <p>macserv</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[macserv]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c870393]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:43:05 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c869548]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
...or just buy a Wacom graphics tablet...</p> <p>foob</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[foob]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c869548]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:57:10 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c868161]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
You can actually make a FTIR prototype using easily available materials.  It's only suitable for use in environments with controlled lighting, so I think there are better multitouch technologies for small commercial devices.</p>
<p>
There is a growing community of developers making their own prototypes, we hang around on #ftir on irc.freenode.net, but the biggest bottleneck is developing good software. I think this is probably where Han will make his money.</p>
<p>
This is Jeff Han's latest video which is a bit more impressive:<br />
<a href="http://fastcompany.com/video/general/perceptivepixel.html">http://fastcompany.com/video/general/perceptivepixel.html<...</a><br />
</p> <p>Joobs</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joobs]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c868161]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 20 Jan 2007 10:28:12 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c868035]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I just got the biggest conspiracy theory.</p>
<p>
As you might know if you <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2007/january#fri-12-jeff_han">read John Gruber's Linked List</a> it's not entirely unlikely that Apple is actually using Jeff Han's FTIR technology in the iPhone. Jeff <a href="http://cs.nyu.edu/~jhan/ftirtouch/">drops a hint</a> of something along those lines <a href="http://cs.nyu.edu/~jhan/ftirtouch/">on his site</a>. (Okay, so <a href="http://tedblog.typepad.com/tedblog/2007/01/the_new_apple_i.html">maybe it isn't the FTIR per se</a>, but anyways, it's multitouch.) </p>
<p>
Do you remember that Apple said that they had <i>one more feature</i> in Leopard that they wanted to keep under the covers until later? Also, do you recall that apple <i>released no new macs</i> at MWSF? That they did <i>not</i> demo Leopard <i>at all</i> there?</p>
<p>
Well, doesn't it suddenly seem entirely possible that the reason for this is that Apple is making also the <i>computer</i> version of Mac OS X multitouch-compatible? And that all new Apple laptops, iMacs and monitors will be equipped with an FTIR/multitouch screen? And they didn't want to show any one of those components (new OS or new hardware) until the entire package was complete and ready to be released?</p>
<p>
For those of you who don't yet realize what an amazing thing multitouch is and what kind of actual real-life applications it has, <a href="http://www.tactiva.com/tactadrawmovielarge.html">please watch the TactaPad</a> demo reel. If Jeff Han's demo didn't amaze you, this will most likely blow you away (because it's a real-world application, not just a nifty demo).</p>
<p>
(By the way, there's a more high-res version of that youtube video over at <a href="http://ted.com/tedtalks/tedtalksplayer.cfm?key=j_han&flashEnabled=1">the TED talks site</a>.)</p> <p><a href="http://www.nevyn.nu/">nevyn</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[nevyn]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c868035]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 20 Jan 2007 07:06:06 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c867097]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
@relawson</p>
<p>
LOL! Isn't it great how ultracapitalist corporations can even make money from their worst nightmares, in this case Sarbanes-Oxley?</p>
<p>
@Peter Kirn</p>
<p>
The iPhone will succeed where Zune failed... it's the social, stupid! One word: Twister!</p> <p>jmdecombe</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[jmdecombe]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c867097]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:11:00 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c866661]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Thats funny, I am a Farnsworth and I'll tell ya what - we learned that patenting things makes financial situations much better. We never got youtube rich, or any rich for that matter.</p> <p>Phoenixdebaser</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phoenixdebaser]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c866661]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:24:54 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c865882]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Old, old news.</p> <p>caramelzappa</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[caramelzappa]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c865882]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:38:35 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c865523]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Infinite points of contact? That doesn't make any sense, unless you have infinite fingers (and it's not even correct).</p>
<p>
But yes, this does demonstrate the possibilities. It makes sense for Apple to limit to two points of contact for reliability given the size of the device. And certainly we'll see more multi-touch, using methods other than back-projection (since that's impractical in most contexts), just as we've seen the JazzMutant Lemur, shipped by Cycling '74.</p>
<p>
At the same time, I wonder if there aren't still lots of possibilities for tactile interfaces, which multi-touch screens generally are not.</p> <p><a href="http://www.createdigitalmusic.com">Peter Kirn</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Kirn]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c865523]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:46:24 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c865479]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Neat and all, but I have to ask...Farnsworth. Philo or Hubert?</p> <p>Thoth74</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thoth74]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c865479]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:40:07 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c865323]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
willy, cameras being stuck in 5mm thick phones has nothing to do with it, since that is meant to take images of stuff 1ft.-infinity distance away. For Hans implementation, the camera would have to be placed about 3 or 4 inches away to cover a 5" screen area. Maybe a special lens could decrease that distance, or maybe a camera sensor the size of the entire screen. But the display would still have to be projected, meaning it wouldn't work with an LCD screen. So, its not going to be in cell phones, probably ever. Also, I think the point IS the technology in making multitouch a reality. As others have pointed out, the concepts for multitouch interfaces have been around for a long time. Capacitive and resistive touchscreens aren't able to accomodate multiple points of contact, so the technologies by Apple and Han are kind of a big deal. I actually find Han's LED matrix multitouch more interesting. If that kind of thing could be scaled down and integrated into a display and combined with proximity sensors and such, he'll probably pwn Apple some day, literally.</p> <p>bvicarious</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[bvicarious]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c865323]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:17:58 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c865215]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
willyolio, you made my point, the significance of Han's work is the software.</p>
<p>
Also, the cameras in this case have to be far enough from the panel to have a clear view of panel itself.  This will make the overall size of the device rather deep, which in the age of LCDs and plasmas is a downside.</p>
<p>
While you're right that an eventual device could be thin it also probably won't use FTIR.</p> <p><a href="http://www.theyshoulddothat.com">getgreg</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[getgreg]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c865215]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:01:48 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c865190]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
What is a "WOP family"?</p> <p>gibson042</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[gibson042]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c865190]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:57:09 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c865181]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
"Maybe the current functionality uses only one or two points of pressure, but the technology may already support more. "</p>
<p>
wonder how much they will charge to enable that ;)</p>
<p>
<br />
i cant wait to see ANYTHING with this, i dont care if its a hello kitty DVD kiosk, i want to use it!</p> <p>relawson</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[relawson]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c865181]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:55:08 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c865113]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
"Han's multi-touch requires cameras behind the glass to actually see where fingers come in contact with the screen and rear projection"</p>
<p>
2 things:<br />
1.  first off, when cameras are being stuck into 5mm thick cellphones, i wouldn't worry about size.  his tech demo is little more than a homebrew prototype, full production models would probably be no thicker than keyboards today.</p>
<p>
2.  the point isn't the technology in making a multitouch panel, it's multitouch itself.  the importance is the design of the software interface and how multitouch allows people to interact with computers differently.  intuitiveness is key.</p> <p>willyolio</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[willyolio]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c865113]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:45:10 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c865105]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
February 2006?? this video has been around for almost a year!</p> <p>Mike918</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike918]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c865105]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:44:07 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c864873]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
This is not only a silly gripe because this video has been around for a while, its silly because the last time I checked, the feature Apple was touting was called "multi-touch", not "duo-touch". Just because the "pinch" is the easiest technique to demostrate doesn't imply a limitation. Sorry, that comparison is an obvious buzz-whore connection to make.</p> <p>Cleverboy</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cleverboy]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c864873]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:17:49 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c864864]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
getgreg check out FTIR or Frustrated Internal Reflection here:<br />
<a href="http://cs.nyu.edu/~jhan/ftirsense/">http://cs.nyu.edu/~jhan/ftirsense/</a><br />
<a href="http://cs.nyu.edu/~jhan/ftirsense/">http://cs.nyu.edu/~jhan/ftirsense/</a></p> <p>Y1n_X1</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Y1n_X1]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c864864]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:17:05 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c864743]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
As cool as these videos are the software driving them is much more impressive than the hardware.  Unless I'm mistaken, Han's multi-touch requires cameras behind the glass to actually see where fingers come in contact with the screen and rear projection.  So as is, this isn't something that can go in your pocket or even hang on a wall.  Apple's multi-touch hardware is impressive because it's thin and flat.</p> <p><a href="http://www.theyshoulddothat.com">getgreg</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[getgreg]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c864743]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:02:29 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c864713]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Wow!  Now I can draw sperm with all five fingers!  At the same time!  My life is complete, and I can die happily!</p> <p>SexCpotatoes</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[SexCpotatoes]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c864713]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:59:34 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c864679]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
As btts said, this has been making its rounds on the net for a year. In fact, this was the first thing I thought of when I saw Jobs introduce the iPhone. I thought Apple might have even licensed the technology as the "pinch" was exactly what I saw in these tech demos before the iPhone.</p> <p>MrBlue</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrBlue]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c864679]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:55:39 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c864577]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Since you brought up the comparison to iPhone. The biggest difference between iPhone and this touch device is that iPhone is an actual production model. That may seem like a nit, but it's not. It takes a lot to make something so hi-tech profitable and reproducable. Everytime we compare something like this to iPhone, we just demonstrate how far ahead Apple really is. </p> <p>joyceman</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[joyceman]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c864577]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:43:01 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c864413]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I'm thinking about a competitor for the optimus keyboard right now.</p>
<p>
A touchscreen keyboard.</p>
<p>
:D</p> <p>Klappstuhl</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Klappstuhl]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c864413]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:23:45 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c864402]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Just to put things in perspective, research in multitouch user interfaces started back in the 1980s, then later Sun demonstrated it in its Starfire project in the early 1990s, so Jeff Han and Apple are merely improving and pushing that stuff into the mainstream, which is great and part of what it is to innovate.</p>
<p>
BTW, how do you know that the iPhone is limited to two points of pressure? Maybe the current functionality uses only one or two points of pressure, but the technology may already support more. Now, whether that would matter on such a small screen is another story...</p>
<p>
You can check out Tog's take on the iPhone UI here:</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.asktog.com/columns/070iPhoneFirstLook.html">http://www.asktog.com/columns/070iPhoneFirstLook.html</a></p> <p>jmdecombe</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[jmdecombe]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c864402]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:22:21 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c864325]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
While this has been out there for a while I am glad that people are finally starting to realize the brilliance of it. Even if it took an Apple release to get this on peoples minds. The possibilities with this technology are endless and if pursued by the right individuals/companies we could see a complete shift in HCI. So come on everyone get excited about the final emergence of this technology into the mainstream because we may not be far off from seeing that silly mouse and keyboard replaced by some FTIR Multi-touch technology.</p> <p>Y1n_X1</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Y1n_X1]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c864325]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:12:38 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c864233]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I saw this a bit ago (as blts has pointed out), but that doesn't make it any less appealing.  This is what computers should be.  An interface that allows us full creative control using the motions we are already familiar with.</p>
<p>
Ok, so maybe not everyone is familiar with them, but grow up in a WOP family and you talk with your hands.  Between touch screen interfaces and chips imbedded in my brain ala Johnny Neumonic, I'm all for future tech to get here.  Add in the nanotech that will keep me buff, beautiful and healthy without any work, ala "The First Immortal" and I'm set.</p>
<p>
Transhuminism is alive and well folks.  This video is showing us the first major step in combining technology with native human motion, which in turn will start the ball rolling to what we should become on the next step of human evolution.</p> <p>bigTrue</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigTrue]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c864233]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:02:09 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c864183]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Very very impressive.</p>
<p>
Hmm, kept thinking of using a real paintbrush with this to actualy paint in Photoshop.<br />
</p> <p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/scingram/">scingram</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[scingram]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c864183]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:57:31 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c864153]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
What's with all the iPhone bashing all of a sudden? You've gone from the 'Jesus Phone' to the 'Stink Phone'.</p>
<p>
PS: Not a card carrying member of the Apple Fanboy Club.</p> <p>maksmir</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[maksmir]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c864153]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:52:43 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Experimental Touchscreen Makes iPhone Look Like a Toy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/experimental-touchscreen-makes-iphone-look-like-a-toy-229965.php#c864115]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
This has been on the web for over a year.</p> <p>blts</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[blts]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:229965:c864115]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:47:08 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>