<![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere! - Gizmodo Comments]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere! - Gizmodo Comments]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> It's http://technosexual.org/ *NOT* .com!!

I also fall into the "Social" category. Although, I've been married for 6 years to a non-tech-inclined lady, she lets me geek-out on occasion, turning the other way when I "have-to" purchase the next "big thing". =-D

BigDanInTX

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> That sound you just heard was a withdrawal from my Faitn-In-Humanity Account....

kalfeer

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> I'm being reminded more and more often of the Burgess book The Wanting Seed

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wanting_Seed

Camperton

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> by the way. that guy in the video cries himself to sleep every night.

Camperton

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> You realize this term was created by a marketing team at Calvin Klein Corp. And they own the trademark on it. I wish I was kidding.

read all about it here

http://www.thestranger.com/blog/2007/03/ck_one_was_grunge_...

Camperton

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> Sorry, a guy that can beat you in an arm wrestle will still "carry" away your lady. No matter how fast you can set up her DSL modem, your still only going to be her friend.

mobileT83

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> seriously, could that report have been filled with more homosexual innuendo! stroking the vaccuum made for quite the happy ending to that reportage!

sporadik

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> Wait, so do they take it in the ass or not?

Joe Manning

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> I decided to visit the website. =] Should have followed the ladies instructions and not go to the .com one. =]

Dim

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> "So what would a gay technosexual be called?"

A sysadmin

winkydink

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> I think it'd be wrong to suggest that people who make up these inane buzzwords are in league with Satan, but y'know...

Sockatume

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> I think this definition pretty much describes a technosexual

technosexual
(TEK.noh.sek.shoo.ul) n. dandyish narcissist in love with not only himself, but also his urban lifestyle & gadgets; a man who is in touch with his feminine side but has fondness for electronics such as cell phones, pda's, computers, software, and the web.

Someone who is a geek in of style, or a stylish person in need of geek is a technosexual.

Hk1981

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> thecnosexual = geek who shops at the GAP???

this is lame. soon there will be iSexuals - bitches who, for no good reason, buy all the Apple gear, etc.

JAMES-42 said it best. get a normalsexual life already.

nakmario

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> These people are totally misusing the word. I know a guy who regularly sticks his dick in his computer. THAT'S a technosexual.

Hunty

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> If you are defined by the stuff that you own, then that stuff owns you, you mindless drone.

james-42

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> Xeonbiologista: Well, there's a distinct shortage of young eligible ladies who fall under the heading of "Smart and Cute".

BTW, what's your number?

(Just kidding)

DirkusMaximus

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> Also, does that make all old people "Technophobic".

slmcdee

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> I always regarded the term technosexual as describing someone who loves technology but also gets laid. A geek with social skills. (they do exist)

divinity

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> Yeah!!!! Technosexual, thats a great word. Now all my friends can stop calling me a "Gadget Whore".

I cry in "1"s and "0"s.

slmcdee

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> Speaking from the girls' side:

"I think brain size and boob size are inversely proportional, 'cos [other roommate]'s really chesty and you're really flat." - my brilliant kid sister's roommate

"Intelligence is sexy." - my engineer boyfriend

If male nerds complain about not getting laid it's because they're blindly chasing bimbos, who have a smorgasbord of men to choose from, and ignoring the smart-yet-cute girls around them.

Xenobiologista

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> ...did that guy just say "cool messenger bags"?

Shockage

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> And, just like Metrosexuals, Homosexuals, or WhateverLabelTheMediaCanPullOutOfItsRearTodaySexual... they ain't gettin' laid by women.

Old No.7

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> Technosexual is the scientific name for "NERD!".

ripfire

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> This just in:
Technosexual movement helps men attract materialistic women through purchasing of fancy gadgets.

Buying the latest crap shouldn't be the way to get the girl. People liked a man who was handy around the house because he had skills, skills you can't just buy. He speaks of being able to set up your girl's wifi, which is a skill, but then goes on to basically advocate buying a whole bunch of expensive, chic speakers and coffee pots and doodads. A vaccuum is a vaccuum. It sucks up dirt? Perfect. What ever happened to people liking others for personality and not how big your iPod hard drive is?

To all the geeks out there (yes, I'm one too and proud of it), read up on non-tech matters. Become a better conversationalist on a broader topic base (read: politics, philosophy, etc.) and improve your wit. Clean up your appearance, but no need to go to extremes, no sense in dressing in an Armani if that's not who you are. Get a girl who likes you for you, not your stuff, and lasting relationships, hopefully true love, will follow.

Tau_Zero

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> D. Flores - try the B & O store near you. Or, failing that, try Sharper Image.

FЯeeMan

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> I don't know if technosexual is the term I would use for that guy....

mopar_man

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> Is that pronounced like "Tech. No sex, you all."

/Just sayin'.

DirkusMaximus

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> Completely ridiculous. And, yeah, old story. The iPods are one giveaway. The Nomads shortly aftwards are another.

jeffj-nj

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> Your right jd91dc, the mini they showed was very old so who knows, they had nothing better to do so they ran this news story.

v2h5a81

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> Lol funny post elistist, I think this technosexual was bound to happend, the metrosexual came and went so it was time for a new one. I doubt it will help get you some nice female fun but why not try.

v2h5a81

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> Whoa, whoa, whoa... now you're not seriously going to show me that video and not tell me where I can buy that totally rockin' butterfly CD player!?

Serolf Divad

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> This must be really old considering whats being shown at the Apple store

jd91dc

]]> <![CDATA[Technosexuals: We're Heeeeeeeere!]]> So what would a gay technosexual be called? Techmosexual? I'm cofused...about the name I mean!

Elitist Snob

]]>