<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Unboxed: Our Shots of the Sidekick iD - Gizmodo Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:58:50 EDT]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:58:50 EDT]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/unboxed-our-shots-of-the-sidekick-id-252098.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Unboxed: Our Shots of the Sidekick iD]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/unboxed-our-shots-of-the-sidekick-id-252098.php#c1275871]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
This is awesome. It has a "Photo Album" but doesnt have a camera. It has a "Web Browser" but only has GPRS to put you on the information highway.</p>
<p>
The boxcasing of the SKID reminds me of the Nokia N-GAGE QD but you could atleast play games online (or offline) on the QD. This thing is beat.</p> <p>superbmtsub</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[superbmtsub]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:252098:c1275871]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:58:50 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Unboxed: Our Shots of the Sidekick iD]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/unboxed-our-shots-of-the-sidekick-id-252098.php#c1271007]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Doesn't seem so bad, for the price anyway. It would be in T-Mobile's interest to try and sell this as one of those free phones with a new contract, since those usually have crappy or no extra features. A lot of people wouldn't mind a free sidekick.</p> <p>Pazuzu</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pazuzu]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:252098:c1271007]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:06:35 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Unboxed: Our Shots of the Sidekick iD]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/unboxed-our-shots-of-the-sidekick-id-252098.php#c1268731]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
So it's bigger (according to nutbastard) AND has a smaller screen? weak...</p> <p>Azndude51</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Azndude51]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:252098:c1268731]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:10:05 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Unboxed: Our Shots of the Sidekick iD]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/unboxed-our-shots-of-the-sidekick-id-252098.php#c1267725]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
How does this compare with the older Sidekick II?  I mean, other than using the trackball instead of a wheel, the specs seem to be the same as the SKII.</p> <p>Hitchcock</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hitchcock]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:252098:c1267725]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:21:15 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Unboxed: Our Shots of the Sidekick iD]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/unboxed-our-shots-of-the-sidekick-id-252098.php#c1267138]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
its actually taller than a sidekick 3, but only a drafter could tell the difference. <br />
+.02<br />
+.18<br />
-.03</p>
<p>
Volume:</p>
<p>
11.0469 cu. in for the sidekick ID<br />
10.557 for the sidekick III</p>
<p>
so the ID is actually bigger... WTF?</p>
<p>
<br />
</p> <p>nutbastard</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[nutbastard]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:252098:c1267138]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:13:48 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Unboxed: Our Shots of the Sidekick iD]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/unboxed-our-shots-of-the-sidekick-id-252098.php#c1266936]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Why am I being assulted by pictures of this thing...have you no shame?</p>
<p>
Seriously though...enough.</p> <p>uhura</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[uhura]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:252098:c1266936]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:51:56 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Unboxed: Our Shots of the Sidekick iD]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/unboxed-our-shots-of-the-sidekick-id-252098.php#c1266639]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Im with PCLoadLetter, how about a comparison, or perhaps some plain old-fasioned dimensions on the photos themselves. You know, the old, "look at this thing next to this ruler" trick.</p>
<p>
And make sure you don't grab Brian Lams <i>personal</i> ruler, or else everyones going to really think this thing is 12 inches across.</p> <p>nutbastard</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[nutbastard]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:252098:c1266639]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:21:53 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Unboxed: Our Shots of the Sidekick iD]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/unboxed-our-shots-of-the-sidekick-id-252098.php#c1266610]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
i would just like to see a comparison shot. i wonder how much smaller it is than a normal sidekick.</p> <p>PCLoadLetter</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[PCLoadLetter]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:252098:c1266610]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:19:26 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Unboxed: Our Shots of the Sidekick iD]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/unboxed-our-shots-of-the-sidekick-id-252098.php#c1266595]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I'm not much of a phone man.  My Nokia 2600 is still kicking and working fine.  The Sidekicks seemed so fragile with their spring hinge, not to mention the cramped keypad.  Now this one is a gelded version of the real Sidekick?  Why bother?</p> <p>DouglasThurman</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[DouglasThurman]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:252098:c1266595]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:18:14 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Unboxed: Our Shots of the Sidekick iD]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/unboxed-our-shots-of-the-sidekick-id-252098.php#c1266522]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
at least they didn't spraypaint the sides of it...</p> <p>PhreakerX</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[PhreakerX]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:252098:c1266522]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:11:24 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>