<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[ - Gizmodo Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:01:13 EDT]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:01:13 EDT]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/notag/-289600.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/notag/-289600.php#c2135921]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>AMD has been lagging behind, but I still always choose them over the 'compitition'. The way thier arcitecture is handled vs the FSB makes it much better to OC and customize. I look forward to real quad core processors.</P> <p>Patryn73</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patryn73]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:289600:c2135921]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:01:13 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/notag/-289600.php#c2132532]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I seriously hope AMD bring their A game and gain back some of the greatness of their glory days. I want to see them kicking intels ass again as soon as possible. </p> <p>PJK</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[PJK]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:289600:c2132532]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:10:10 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/notag/-289600.php#c2132384]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Oh dear, not another delay? I don't think it's another nail in AMD's coffin; rather they are working to perfect the processors as best as possible. Remember these are the first real quad core X86 and not a stitch together dual dual core.</P> <p>Blue_Mountain</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blue_Mountain]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:289600:c2132384]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:01:09 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/notag/-289600.php#c2132241]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Oh dear, another nail in the coffin for AMD?</p> <p>PJK</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[PJK]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:289600:c2132241]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 15 Aug 2007 05:26:05 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>