<![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano - Gizmodo Comments]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano - Gizmodo Comments]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> Butt fugly. Over & out.

banmojo

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> jc, why do people think something is fake if it has a .psd extension. don't you know that ALL pictures in print usually start out as .psd files?

turi319

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> Let's see...
These are as fake as all those iPhone rumor pics/mockups from 2006.

BTW, wouldn't it be cool if Gizmodo rounded up some of those rumored iPhone pics from last year and recapped them...?

ThriftyTechie

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> No everybody! i have the really, real, super-secret spy picture:

------------------
- ******** -
- ******** -
- ******** -

-   (   O   )  -

-                -

------------------

gabrielm

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> Trackback

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> If that's a 3" screen, I'll be happy.

All my Adult Swim collections are in 4:3 anyway

jrbd90

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> and my new zen v 2gb comes in the mail today and Im glad and will settle...screw ipods

Sternfan91

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> Okay, so, now I've learned you can't embed videos. I haven't had my coffee today, leave me be.

But this reminds me of one of their greatest products, the iRack.

luckypictures

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]>

luckypictures

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> I think that thi is indeed just a rumor and I hope more than anything that it doesn't come into fruition. Those are the ugliest damn iPods I've ever seen and I don't think Apple is capable of producing such an abomination. I'm sure they can find other ways to make their Nanos play video. Right?

Thunderous_Thor

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> Use the Tags, Luke!

Not:Apple means I don't want to see iPods, iPhones, iMacs, or any other iCrap.

AmishJohn

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> That looks more like a full sized iPod, assuming Apple delays the iPhone-like all screen...

trendspotter

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> besides, tiffany blue and burgundy ipods? yuck!

kahri

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> Just doesn't make sense to me. The Nano is clearly aimed at the exercise market, with all the armbands, Nike+ sensors, etc. This shape makes no sense for that market.

EBone

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> @nachobel: Work in progress?

Rusdude

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> @nachobel: let me rephrase: Wow, so it doesn't take much PS skills to make it on Apple's Ad team?

kahri

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> @Rusdude: I mean, they're not even evenly spaced. How could you possibly think this is anywhere near accurate?

nachobel

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> Yes, it's a PSD file and so what? Where do you think this file (photograph of a computer screen) came from? Probably from one of the graphic artists working on images for Apple's site and/or other promo material.

Rusdude

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> Wow, so it doesn't take much PS skills to make it on gizmodo huh? 9to5mac should have worked til at least 6.

kahri

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> I think apple has done all they can do design wise and are revisiting some of the classics for the retro look.

There is a whole new generation of kids who don't remember the early models.

kibets

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> haha, this idiot didn't even bother to take the photo out of photoshop.. no way would apple design something this ugly.. notice how the front face looks rounded along the edges?

this is about the lamest fake i've ever seen.. i've just about had it with apple fans wasting everyone's time so they can have a secret moment in the sun while their fake gadgets get posted on blogs.. get a life

kidwei

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> Also, would anyone want a screen much smaller then the nanos? I mean, there comes a point where it's just like go watch the tv you effing idiot. Like, would you want a shuffle sized player with a screen? No. It would be stupid and pointless. I think the only way for them to go from here is to make a media player the size of a credit card, maybe a little thicker, that can do what a nano does and fit in a wallet. Other then that, what else can they do but make all their other gadgets resemble their phone only thinner. If you can't tell, I like the shuffle but I think the rest of apple is over-rated crap.......that's shiny.

MJDeviant

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> This is why I think they are fake. The shadows are all off on the photo (light source is not consistent, drop shadow isn't matching the placement). Also, look at the name of the file the screen shot has in it. The .psd format lets you know that it's a photoshop file, they are basically letting you know that it was manipulated. From a design standpoint it doesn't make sense either, the scroll-wheel would be ergonomically uncomfortable being so close to the bottom. Also, it's ugly as hell.

Mayor McRib

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> Why would they make giganto-nanos? That defeats the purpose. If they wanted to make something ugly, too bad, Microsoft already did the best job at that. It's called the Zune.

TuxRug

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> By looking at the top of the window and seeing it's a PSD file, it seems pretty fake to me.

noonas

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> oviously fake, look at the ipod's shadows, they are incongruent between them and between the supposed light source. that is in the center.

look at this picture, the red arrows show the actual shadows directions and the green the what should be the correct shadows acording to that light source.

[img407.imageshack.us]

lolec

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> the iPod Ricky Gervais. "fatty fatty toad-boy"

MJDeviant

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> Fake.

Pope John Peeps II

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> This picture isn't real, look at the shadows. What kind of light source does that?

Also, Jonathan Ive would have not allowed this to be. Steve has no fashion sense what-so-ever, so him possibly. But the Ive will kill.

nachobel

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> If those are somehow real, that's a big screw up. One of the best things about the nano is it's size. Maybe this is a new ipod named the Macro (name works on like, 2 levels).

RobotVampire

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> The shadows on the buttons all indicated they were made one at the time and then placed.... and its blurry.

FAKE.

Besides, wouldnt that just be the new gen flash based ipod video?

baandoptager

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> "giant" is a relative term...

mfaerber

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> does no one see that the image above clearly has .psd at the top of the picture window... it's a photoshop document... a little more effort in hiding the fakeness please

slashy

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> @Windhawk: Make that no "way" in hell.

Though these should be dropped down some well in hell too...

Windhawk

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> Fake, fake and fake again. Makes no sense for Apple to do this. Fake, I say, mark my words!

mac_kix_windoze

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> I call bullshit.

There is no well in hell Steve would release something that fugly on the world.

Windhawk

]]> <![CDATA[(UPDATE) iPod Nano Spy Shots Show Fat, Big-Screened Nano]]> Those are hideous, but I still want one!

LillieDesigns

]]>