<![CDATA[AMD To Make Tri-Core Processors - Gizmodo Comments]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[AMD To Make Tri-Core Processors - Gizmodo Comments]]> http://gizmodo.com Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:10:40 EST Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:10:40 EST http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/processors/amd-to-make-tri+core-processors-300233.php <![CDATA[AMD To Make Tri-Core Processors]]> http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/processors/amd-to-make-tri+core-processors-300233.php#c3403727 Oh yeah...I can see the various forum posts & geek-sites headlines into the future now:

"Discover the 4th core"
Geek overclocks flawed AMD 3-core - discovers 4th core at 3.12 ghz.

"The 4 core trick"
Here´s how to awake AMDs fourth hidden core! In 3000-easy steps.

"AMD says - it´s really our duo-core, get one extra free!"
"Hacker opens flawed 3-core chip to find 8 cores inside, 5-dead"




JoOngle

]]> 4:300233:c3403727 Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:10:40 EST <![CDATA[AMD To Make Tri-Core Processors]]> http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/processors/amd-to-make-tri+core-processors-300233.php#c2413664 That threesome bit would have been a good marketing campaign. lol.

That would really appeal to the hard core gamer market comprised of mostly men.

AMD should be thanking you guys.

nosauten

]]> 4:300233:c2413664 Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:11:21 EDT <![CDATA[AMD To Make Tri-Core Processors]]> http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/processors/amd-to-make-tri+core-processors-300233.php#c2413419 The AMD chief gives a pretty decent interview in the most recent Newsweek.

[www.msnbc.msn.com]

scarbrtj

]]> 4:300233:c2413419 Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:29:27 EDT <![CDATA[AMD To Make Tri-Core Processors]]> http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/processors/amd-to-make-tri+core-processors-300233.php#c2413320 As long as bigger is better computers will keep expanding, getting faster.
I envision my kids remembering a 4 ghz as an ancient system. I remember when I bought a 300 mhz hp for $1200. That was the latest and greatest.

Parker. A

]]> 4:300233:c2413320 Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:47:26 EDT <![CDATA[AMD To Make Tri-Core Processors]]> http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/processors/amd-to-make-tri+core-processors-300233.php#c2413269 Wow i would've loved seeing the AMD President say that.
Truely you could get more out of a tri-core processor than out of a quad core processor.
If each core was calculated to 1ghz then you'd have just about 15-20 processes to each processor and somewhere around 25-30 each when in its in use (as 100%). I say good. Windows uses 25 default processes plus the regular 10-15 you get out of your programs that are running.
So i say go for it. Quad core is smaller more energy efficient but i doubt intel will release a 4ghz processor to regular computer users. Maybe to the gamers or the people who'll pay for it.




SneakerFiend

]]> 4:300233:c2413269 Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:16:05 EDT <![CDATA[AMD To Make Tri-Core Processors]]> http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/processors/amd-to-make-tri+core-processors-300233.php#c2413245 It's like Dr. House
"I'm only into foursomes now. 'Cause if one people back out, you're still having a threesome. If two people back out, you're still having sex and if three people back out, well... You can still have sex, only it isn't going to be as fun"

dhekke

]]> 4:300233:c2413245 Sat, 15 Sep 2007 10:59:44 EDT