<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[iPaq 110 and 210 Apparently Cost Money - Gizmodo Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Sun, 07 Oct 2007 22:56:41 EDT]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 07 Oct 2007 22:56:41 EDT]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pdas/ipaq-110-and-210-apparently-cost-money-307925.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPaq 110 and 210 Apparently Cost Money]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pdas/ipaq-110-and-210-apparently-cost-money-307925.php#c2589904]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Hey, one of those has a port for Compact Flash though. Me, I like my Dell Axim because I can pull the Compact Flash card out of my Nikon, pop into the Axim, and let someone review shots without having them touch my camera.</P> <p>kenyonk</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[kenyonk]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:307925:c2589904]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 07 Oct 2007 22:56:41 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPaq 110 and 210 Apparently Cost Money]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pdas/ipaq-110-and-210-apparently-cost-money-307925.php#c2587565]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>mehh all I need is a web browser on my portable device(if I want to edit word documents and stuff I definitely dont want to do it on a little thing like the=at, thats why I have a laptop) so thats why I am happy I spent my money on a much sexier more user friendly ipod touch whith 16gbs so I don't have to mess with those damn memory cards.</p> <p>ppeetteeyy</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ppeetteeyy]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:307925:c2587565]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 07 Oct 2007 12:26:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPaq 110 and 210 Apparently Cost Money]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pdas/ipaq-110-and-210-apparently-cost-money-307925.php#c2586496]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>That and there are still quite a few places where you can't bring converged data devices.</p>
<p>Why can't we get these specs in a phone yet? I don't mind a little girth. Why can't my phone have a VGA screen, 624MHz processor, built in GPS, WiFi and Bluetooth, 128RAM/256ROM. Where is my HTC Universal 2?</p> <p><a href="http://someaudioguy.blogspot.com">SomeAudioGuy</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[SomeAudioGuy]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:307925:c2586496]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 07 Oct 2007 00:01:42 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPaq 110 and 210 Apparently Cost Money]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pdas/ipaq-110-and-210-apparently-cost-money-307925.php#c2586161]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>David, I would make sure the return policy on that T-mobile Wing is an exceptionally good one. I purchased one not too long ago, and it was one of the most frustrating experiences I've ever had with any electronic device. I ended up returning it for a Blackberry 8800. I've since been very happy with it.</p> <p>xephrey</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[xephrey]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:307925:c2586161]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 06 Oct 2007 22:40:40 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPaq 110 and 210 Apparently Cost Money]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pdas/ipaq-110-and-210-apparently-cost-money-307925.php#c2586122]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2585744">grok666</a>: Amen brother!</p> <p>microe</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[microe]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:307925:c2586122]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 06 Oct 2007 22:33:08 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPaq 110 and 210 Apparently Cost Money]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pdas/ipaq-110-and-210-apparently-cost-money-307925.php#c2585744]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>I've had one PDA during the same time that I've had 3 different cell phones (breakage, battery issues, sound quality, etc., were reasons for replacing them). On my PDA I can listen to MP3's, watch video, read ebooks, play games, access Wi-Fi for browsing/email, and a shortened down version of Office lets me view/edit spreadsheets, Word docs, etc. The only person I've met with a Windows Mobile cell phone complained about lock-ups when the phone rings. I'm good with separate hardware for now. :-)</P> <p>grok666</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[grok666]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:307925:c2585744]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 06 Oct 2007 21:01:56 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPaq 110 and 210 Apparently Cost Money]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pdas/ipaq-110-and-210-apparently-cost-money-307925.php#c2585725]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>The 210's predecessor, the HX4700, was the best piece of technology I have ever owned, and when I heard HP was phasing these out, I bought 3 more of them, so I would have enough to last me until I died. Fact is, the first one I ever bought is still working fine and I never used the other ones. Doh!</p>
<p>The 210 basically does the same as the 4700, but they got rid of the useless touch pad which was good in theory, but useless in practice. I presume there are 2-3 years of technical advances in there too.</p>
<p>Unless there is some disasterous production problem, this machine will be worth the money: video player and ebook reader supreme with the bright sharp 4 inch true VGA display, all the usual PDA apps with a huge library of legacy software, and no money, weight, and functionality wasted on phone applications.</p>
<p>This machine will blow the iTouch away in terms of real functionality, but sadly will never garner the fanboy attention. Oh well,  more for me.</p> <p>gylman</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[gylman]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:307925:c2585725]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 06 Oct 2007 20:58:50 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPaq 110 and 210 Apparently Cost Money]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pdas/ipaq-110-and-210-apparently-cost-money-307925.php#c2585646]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I lament the demise of the PDA, but will probably be buying a T-Mobile Wing soon. Carrying just one lightweight device makes more sense than a phone $ PDA separately. I love the GPS in my Mio 350, but it's like carrying a toaster oven everywhere I go. Thing's heavy and huge. The Wing is small and light.</p> <p><a href="http://davidflores.blogspot.com">Serolf Divad</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Serolf Divad]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:307925:c2585646]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 06 Oct 2007 20:40:15 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPaq 110 and 210 Apparently Cost Money]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pdas/ipaq-110-and-210-apparently-cost-money-307925.php#c2585598]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>HP is one of the last companies still making stand alone PDAs.  For years, I held off getting a smartphone, but now for the last 18 months since I've had one, I can't image carrying two devices again.</p> <p><a href="http://www.chillywilly.org">chillywilly</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[chillywilly]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:307925:c2585598]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 06 Oct 2007 20:27:34 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPaq 110 and 210 Apparently Cost Money]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pdas/ipaq-110-and-210-apparently-cost-money-307925.php#c2585500]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2585357">waterdrop</a>: point taken.  but i don't care for pda's</p> <p>Sternfan91</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sternfan91]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:307925:c2585500]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 06 Oct 2007 20:04:11 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPaq 110 and 210 Apparently Cost Money]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pdas/ipaq-110-and-210-apparently-cost-money-307925.php#c2585357]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2585348">Sternfan91</a>: <br>
Maybe if one doesn't want to be locked into a contract?</p> <p>waterdrop</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[waterdrop]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:307925:c2585357]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 06 Oct 2007 19:17:14 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPaq 110 and 210 Apparently Cost Money]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pdas/ipaq-110-and-210-apparently-cost-money-307925.php#c2585348]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>lol guys.</p>
<p>why not pay the same money to get something WITH a keyboard AND the capability to make calls.</p> <p>Sternfan91</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sternfan91]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:307925:c2585348]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 06 Oct 2007 19:15:20 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>