<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Verizon's F700 Variant Could Actually Be the Samsung SCH-U940 - Gizmodo Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:37:56 EDT]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:37:56 EDT]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/verizons-f700-variant-could-actually-be-the-samsung-sch+u940-317493.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Verizon's F700 Variant Could Actually Be the Samsung SCH-U940]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/verizons-f700-variant-could-actually-be-the-samsung-sch+u940-317493.php#c2858794]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="#c2845955">xxdesmus</A>: It's not a smartphone. It's a high-featured phone. Why should it have WinMo if it's not playing at being a PDA?</P> <p><a href="http://www.tuckermax.com/">Sqube</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sqube]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:317493:c2858794]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:37:56 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Verizon's F700 Variant Could Actually Be the Samsung SCH-U940]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/verizons-f700-variant-could-actually-be-the-samsung-sch+u940-317493.php#c2845955]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Wait...this doesn't even have Win Mobile? Really? That's retarded!</p> <p><a href="http://xxdesmusxx.net">xxdesmus</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[xxdesmus]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:317493:c2845955]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:00:57 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Verizon's F700 Variant Could Actually Be the Samsung SCH-U940]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/verizons-f700-variant-could-actually-be-the-samsung-sch+u940-317493.php#c2843855]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2835015">saych</a>: that's the way verizon does it. haha</p>
<p>but if samsung is gonna make this phone in a CDMA flavor, i'd really love to see it hit sprint with the adobe-designed UI.  i'd be more than greatful for the 2MP camera because i've decided that 800x600 is fucking enough on a phone, multi-magapixel camera phones are overkill.  what i think is more important is a speakerphone that sounds clear on both ends, a good music player, and being able to multitask. (sending an IM or a text, or even looking at the fucking clock, without stopping the music and exiting media player.  something i hate my phone for because it doesnt have that.)</p>
<p>and @<a href="#c2834354">bigMoneyMIKE</a>: EV-DO enabled phone's cant do analog.  i'm not sure why, but look at sprint's power vision lineup and i dont think a single one will handle an analog AMPS signal.  so dual-mode would be the way.  especially if it included both EV-DO/Rev.A and HSDPA/HSUPA/UMTS, but my dreams rarely become reality.</p> <p>rimplestultskin</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[rimplestultskin]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:317493:c2843855]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:17:52 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Verizon's F700 Variant Could Actually Be the Samsung SCH-U940]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/verizons-f700-variant-could-actually-be-the-samsung-sch+u940-317493.php#c2835015]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>yes, their own variant, which translates to crappy as hell OS stuffed in version.</P> <p>saych</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[saych]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:317493:c2835015]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:15:02 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Verizon's F700 Variant Could Actually Be the Samsung SCH-U940]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/verizons-f700-variant-could-actually-be-the-samsung-sch+u940-317493.php#c2834942]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>No wifi, no deal. period.</p> <p><a href="http://xxdesmusxx.net">xxdesmus</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[xxdesmus]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:317493:c2834942]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:01:29 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Verizon's F700 Variant Could Actually Be the Samsung SCH-U940]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/verizons-f700-variant-could-actually-be-the-samsung-sch+u940-317493.php#c2834650]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>It's awesome how they... downgraded... the camera?</P>
<P>Wait, what? You almost had me for a second with that one, Verizon. That's a typo... isn't it?</P> <p><a href="http://www.tuckermax.com/">Sqube</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sqube]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:317493:c2834650]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:06:19 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Verizon's F700 Variant Could Actually Be the Samsung SCH-U940]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/verizons-f700-variant-could-actually-be-the-samsung-sch+u940-317493.php#c2834354]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/verizons-f700-variant-could-actually-be-the-samsung-sch+u940-317493.php#c2833726">Ryan.Reed</A>: Dude, how on Earth would there be a "quad band" CDMA phone? The most you could have ever hope for would be TRI-MODE, DUAL BAND, as 850Mhz CDMA is broadcast on the same AMPS frequency.</P> <p>bigMoneyMIKE</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigMoneyMIKE]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:317493:c2834354]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:11:15 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Verizon's F700 Variant Could Actually Be the Samsung SCH-U940]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/verizons-f700-variant-could-actually-be-the-samsung-sch+u940-317493.php#c2834253]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>wasn't this announced right about the same time as the iphone?  Why is it taking so much longer to be released?  I remember debating over whether to get the iphone or this last winter.</p> <p><a href="http://www.myspace.com/whoisjohngalt">The Chad</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Chad]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:317493:c2834253]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:50:58 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Verizon's F700 Variant Could Actually Be the Samsung SCH-U940]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/verizons-f700-variant-could-actually-be-the-samsung-sch+u940-317493.php#c2833951]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I agree that WiFi would be sa-weet but on Verizon's network you can achieve some pretty damn fast speeds and will have more access too.  I live in Chicago so WiFi would be killer but for the majority of the U.S. WiFi isn't as common...</p>
<p>Hell, I just want to actually see this come to fruition so I'll stop my whining...</p> <p>RemmingtonShowdown</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[RemmingtonShowdown]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:317493:c2833951]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:54:57 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Verizon's F700 Variant Could Actually Be the Samsung SCH-U940]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/verizons-f700-variant-could-actually-be-the-samsung-sch+u940-317493.php#c2833726]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I'm happy they could be cutting back on the camera for this version.  I don't really care about a camera on my phone and if it brings the price down, I'm all for it.  Only a few things I wish they'd do with this phone</p>
<p>1.)  Make it quad band (one can hope)<br>
2.)  Add WiFi (doubt it'll happen but one can hope)</p>
<p>Would be nice.</p> <p><a href="http://www.reedium.com">Ryan.Reed</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan.Reed]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:317493:c2833726]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:17:06 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Verizon's F700 Variant Could Actually Be the Samsung SCH-U940]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/verizons-f700-variant-could-actually-be-the-samsung-sch+u940-317493.php#c2833625]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Hey for Verizon, that's not too bad. At least there isnt a number pad on the front as WELL as QWERTY keyboard... Still pretty shite if you ask me. We need a Gphone or something good. When my contract expires in 7 months, i may have to give up on Verizon..</P> <p><a href="http://rhstevenson.com">Wegmans</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wegmans]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:317493:c2833625]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:01:21 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>