<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved - Gizmodo Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Sat, 09 Feb 2008 12:50:44 EST]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 09 Feb 2008 12:50:44 EST]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c4131142]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Will I be able to use this phone with Alltel service?  I am so disappointed about the lack of interest by manufacturers to carry the Immersion Vibetonz!</p> <p>EquityGroups.com</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[EquityGroups.com]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c4131142]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 09 Feb 2008 12:50:44 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3482058]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I find it excessively pathetic that American carriers ,such as 'Verizon' or whatever, have to completely deprecate the original international versions of their purported 'products.' The reduction of a 5MP camera to a meagre and utterly prodigal 2MP camera is a fitting example of their idiotic approach to technology. In fact, they have always been quite worthless, as far as I am concerned. Thank you.</p> <p>ZWizard666</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ZWizard666]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3482058]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:49:56 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3470451]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I don't believe this is supposed to have wifi.</p>
<p>It looks great (and I've always liked Samsung products) but I think I'm going to hold out for a more full-fledged smartphone this time around.  Supposedly the HTC Touch/Vogue, HTC Iris, and Blackberry Curve are finally going to be making their way onto Verizon in the fairly near future (and in roughly that order.)</p> <p>Ron-Mexico</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron-Mexico]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3470451]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Dec 2007 20:15:44 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3468510]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Wifi or not wifi? If it has wifi I may just buy this phone (I am stuck on Verizon anyways).</p> <p><a href="http://xxdesmusxx.net">xxdesmus</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[xxdesmus]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3468510]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:17:26 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3420434]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>It doesn't have a VZW ui. Well, thats not 100% true since the obviously added their own things like get it now, navigator and what not but its keeping the basic croix ui look and feel.</P>
<P>The early pics looks like it has the odd 3 row key board in place of the 4 rows they ended up putting on the GSM version.</P>
<P>I'm going to give it a try when it comes out (assuming there isn't something that I want more before then, which, will undoubtly happen)</P> <p>tande</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[tande]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3420434]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:30:49 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3412622]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Don't single out Verizon for crippling camera features; all US providers do it. That said, I'll only get this phone if it <B>doesn't</B> have the VZW UI. I know the chances between this are somewhere between "slim" and "snowball in Lucifer's asshole," but a man has to be able to dream.</P>
<P>That said, I'm pretty sure all US cell phone providers have a size limit when it comes to sending images, so I doubt they're overly concerned about the bandwidth getting clogged. I think it's more an issue of "this is cheaper for us, but we're sure as shit not going to pass any savings on to you."</P>
<P>I can't wait until next year, when Verizon (presumably) opens up their network and I never have to walk into one of their stores again. It's not like they ever know anything I don't anyway.</P> <p><a href="http://www.tuckermax.com/">Sqube</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sqube]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3412622]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:54:27 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3405125]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c3399677">Hackoff</a>: They cripple the cameras to: <br>
a) Save bandwidth on their network.  Big difference in data volume if everybody was suddenly slinging around 5megapixel MMS messages.<br>
b) Cut down on support calls.  Many, many Verizon phones (many phones in general) can't display a 5megapixel image, some just reject the message.</p>
<p>So gee, thanks Verizon.  Keep cranking out crappy phones.  AT&amp;T is going to eat your lunch because they are getting the best phones.  And god help you when the 3G iPhone 2.0 comes out.</p> <p>pete</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[pete]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3405125]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:53:34 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3404361]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>it sure has taken a long time for this phone to come stateside (like over a year).  probably old tech by now.</p> <p>dhaberer</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[dhaberer]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3404361]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:58:12 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3403962]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Castrated, honestly, with the loss of that camera. Still lacks smartphone abilities that could set it apart, and now it's missing key media features..</p>
<p>Latest specs on the GSM version have a 3.15MP camera though. Sad, the Viewty has a 5MP and at least two other Samsung phones, one with a xenon flash and 3x optical zoom.</p> <p>Ypoknons</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ypoknons]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3403962]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:30:55 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3402309]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I kinda like this.</p>
<p>It's bound to be slimmer than the VX10000, and I still get a keyboard for texting.</p>
<p>I have a ways to go for m y new every two, so we'll be watching this closely.</p> <p><a href="http://portableapps.com/">strider_mt2k</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[strider_mt2k]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3402309]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:50:40 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3400773]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c3398861">chillarmadillo</a>: ok ok, I did not know this was going to have a SRP of $700. in light of this new information let me revise my stance. Macfly hit it on the head, why is this being released along side the Voyager!?</p> <p>Lavallee017</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lavallee017]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3400773]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:45:31 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3400566]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>They probably do it to lower the cost for them, but keep the price high for you, increasing their profit margin.</p>
<p>This is a really nice looking phone, qwerty keyboard is so nice. I might actually get this one if i like the software on it.</p> <p>prodigal_son</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[prodigal_son]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3400566]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:27:48 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3400023]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c3399677">Hackoff</a>: I second that. Wtf?? Does Verizon have to cripple <i>everything</i> ?</p> <p>Pazuzu</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pazuzu]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3400023]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:48:23 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3399677]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Why the f*&amp;k does Verizon always maim the camera function on it's phones??</p>
<p>If it was developed as a 5 megapixel camera, why does Verizon change it to a 2 megapixel version?</p>
<p>Anyone know why?</p> <p>Hackoff</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hackoff]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3399677]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:21:12 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3399503]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>wifi? if so yes, otherwise, no.</p> <p>ruindpzzle</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ruindpzzle]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3399503]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:08:18 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3399128]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>I'm all for more options. Many VZW faithful have seen the Voyager and have said, "next." I'm hoping it's slimmer and with a better touch screen: <A href="http://www.phonearena.com/htmls/Samsung-SCH-U940-phone-p_2469.html">[www.phonearena.com]</A></P> <p>trendspotter</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[trendspotter]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3399128]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:45:56 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3398861]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="#c3398401">Lavallee017</A>:</P>
<P>Only problem is that the gsm version is about 700 bucks, so I doubt that this will be "wallet friendly".</P> <p>chillarmadillo</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[chillarmadillo]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3398861]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:30:50 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3398627]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>i agree, with marty...if its going to have a touch screen like that i would want some smartphone features...</p> <p>soulman</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[soulman]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3398627]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:17:58 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3398401]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c3398216">Marty_MacFly</a>: Yea I guess they did but the phone itself is so expensive. I could be wrong but this one looks to be a more wallet friendly version of the Voyager with a little less functionality but better than your average flip phone. Only time will tell</p> <p>Lavallee017</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lavallee017]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3398401]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:05:36 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3398216]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3398008">Lavallee017</A>: Didn't they already do that with the LG Voyager?</P> <p>Marty_MacFly</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marty_MacFly]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3398216]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:55:25 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Samsung F700 (U940) Touchscreen Phone FCC Approved]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335892/samsung-f700-u940-touchscreen-phone-fcc-approved#c3398008]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>nice lines and appears very simplistic. being a Verizon customer I hope the adapt the VZW UI for this and release it as soon as they can for those who want a great texting phone but not the smartphone bill.</p> <p>Lavallee017</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lavallee017]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:335892:c3398008]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:46:03 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>