<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes - Gizmodo Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:47:18 EDT</lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:47:18 EDT</pubDate>
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes</link>
		<description></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c5007501</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>The real reason they don't want app's running in the background is obvious, AT&amp;T knows that if everyone who has an iphone has constantly connected bandwidth sucking applications sitting in the background it will hammer the network and overwhelm towers. Read their terms of service. If they allowed instant messaging and VoIP apps how are they going to rape you on txt messaging and minute overages ? 2+2=</p>
<p>It's all about $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$</p> <p>ninjacodr</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ninjacodr]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c5007501</guid>
		    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:47:18 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4665254</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4602184">lianna_g</a>: You wrote, "There's this power user's browser called Firefox ... Users BECOME aware of the trade-offs and behave accordingly."</p>
<p>There you have it. You're thinking in terms of POWER users. Apple is thinking in terms of NORMAL users. The iPhone is not for you.</p> <p>hatfinch</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[hatfinch]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4665254</guid>
		    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:13:13 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4619308</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>This is such garbage. Proves once again that the iPhone is NOT a smartphone and is useless for true business users or those of us who have mid-size expectations for our device.</p> <p><a href="http://jarrettlennon.com">TurboFool</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TurboFool]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4619308</guid>
		    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:02:57 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4617696</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>as someone noted above, apple will licence the big companies and then sell the software via itunes.<BR>yes you people are f*cked again... $$$.</P>
<P>thing is, the "small" developers will be left out in teh rain.</P>
<P>the product is great, and arguably the best phone on the market right now, but my biggest beef with apple is that when you buy something from them, its not yours.</P>
<P>maybe if they call it a "lease" i will feel a lot better. cause you pay $500 an are still mandated by a 2yr contract (unless u hack), and you cannot run what you want (unless u hack).</P>
<P>so whose device is it really? i must be a child "don't do that" "sit here" "i know what's best for you".</P>
<P>LOL</P></BR> <p>keyser</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[keyser]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4617696</guid>
		    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:42:18 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4612861</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4594912">Buran</A>: Amen, Buran. kezratt1...troll...*cough*</P> <p><a href="http://">*click**click*</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[*click**click*]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4612861</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:01:42 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4612719</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Windows Mobile lets me run whatever the hell I want to on my phone.</p> <p><a href="http://">aaron8301</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[aaron8301]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4612719</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:32:05 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4609863</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4605978">ParJoe</a>: You CAN play it on an iPod touch!</p> <p>bigMoneyMIKE</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigMoneyMIKE]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4609863</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:00:33 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4609862</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>uh, so my shitty MOTORAZR2 V8 (according to you people, Moto has no quality products) does MULTITASKING, Voice Recognition, etc at 1/2 the price? I am so fucking tired of everyone saying how great the iPhone is. And to be fair, that NOKIA N95 is an absolute JOKE. Fuck Nokia. When is the last time NOKIA made shit that was truly popular here? Right. If iPhone 2.0 is what everyone says it might be, I will hop on board and buy in. But as of now, it just isn't a great PHONE.</p> <p>bigMoneyMIKE</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigMoneyMIKE]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4609862</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:00:07 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4607123</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Jeez. Hasn't the T-Mobile Sidekick been doing this for 5+ years now? They let third party apps run in the background and it doesn't seem to be causing problems for them. I don't get it? Where's the trust?</P> <p>pigmaniac</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[pigmaniac]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4607123</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 14:52:45 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4605978</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4602184">lianna_g</a>: That was very well put. I think that's my main problem with Apple (aside from price). I LOVE adding stuff to firefox and I balance performance/features the way I like.</p>
<p>I still wanna play spore on the iPhone though damnit!</p> <p><a href="http://">ParJoe</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ParJoe]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4605978</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:40:03 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4605841</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I should say I tested it on the simulator using the fw2 libraries.</p> <p>ramond</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ramond]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4605841</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:12:35 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4605837</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to debunk your article but I'm a programmer and I just tried it and you can keep your app running in the background in the normal way ApolloIM and iFob do it. I.e. overriding applicationSuspend.</p>
<p>So IM apps will still work in the background no worries there. The real issue is if Apple will remove them from the app store if they figure out your app does it. I honestly don't think they'll care.</p>
<p>As for background daemons like Navizon and MobileScrobbler we won't know if those work on the real phone until fw2 beta gets into our hands. One issue might be the applicaton is unable to write to the daemon folder. However this could be easily solved by an app in the store that turns off security (i.e. jailbreaks). Apple might not like that app though and it might need to be distributed through other means.</p>
<p>So I imagine it might be like this: you can get your app from the store and it works with partial functionality, and then if you disable security you will get full functionality as background tasks will be allowed. The app can show a readme of how to do this to make it easy</p> <p>ramond</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ramond]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4605837</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:11:41 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4605658</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4605485">izim1</A>: Amen.</P>
<P>Seriously, whenever I use AIM on my computer, if I don't feel like chatting, or I got to play a game, what do I do? Shut it down. It takes 2 seconds to boot up, so I can check if there are any people worth talking to on, and if not, close it again. Whoever said they use it like SMS is seriously not getting the point of instant messaging. That is why there is SMS. If you seriously think people need to get ahold of you in more ways than just calling you, get over yourself. Here's an idea. It's a phone, how about you have your friends CALL you on it. Sheesh.</P> <p>DakotaEpic</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[DakotaEpic]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4605658</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 10:26:44 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4605485</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I still don't understand why people think the iPhone SHOULD do this or that. People know what it can and can't do. If you want chat, mms, gps and whatnot than buy a phone that can do that. This "I want an iPhone but I want it to do this and that...." attitude is ridiculous. It'll be like some one buying a blackjack and demanding a touchscreen on it. "what you guys don't have touchscreen? Muhahahaha". Find something more productive to do with your times. "what? Your corvette can only fit 2 people? Muhahaha! I paid the same price for my SUV that fits EIGHT people AND is twice as big, plus my sound system is better! Your such a fanboy"......:</p> <p>izim1</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[izim1]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4605485</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 09:29:44 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4605106</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@Fuxion</p>
<p>Drink you Kool Aid and shut up.</p> <p>Sleeper_Service</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sleeper_Service]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4605106</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 05:55:46 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4604882</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Unless it comes from apple i wont believe this. I mean how dumb can you be too believe that theres no multitasking for apps, when the iPhone has been doing it since day one. Its either the news was wrongly misinterpreted or its all bull crap.  Whoever made the article is just trying to downplay the greatness that was presented at the SDk town-hall meeting. Sad that people will actually buy into this article</p> <p>Fuxion</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fuxion]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4604882</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 03:49:59 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4604459</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>One app? major LOL</p> <p>giodelgado</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[giodelgado]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4604459</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 02:07:45 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4603741</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Cowboy Neil dosent see an upside and neither do I.</P> <p>MONSTERGOC</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[MONSTERGOC]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4603741</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:03:57 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4603227</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4601054">extremer</a>: <i>"I am just really tired of all the apathetic views that many blogs are taking towards Apple."</i></p>
<p>"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."</p> <p><a href="http://toastradio.com/">someToast</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[someToast]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4603227</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 22:58:17 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4602731</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>that's not fair, we wanna chat without having to disconnect for changing a song o something like that, that's dissapointing.</p> <p>martiin</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[martiin]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4602731</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 22:05:34 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4602708</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Looks like I'm not leaving Installer.app any time soon.</p> <p>jamar0303</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[jamar0303]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4602708</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 22:02:03 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4602225</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>apple should have a program where they analyze most-popular third party apps and deem them OK or not for background use.  when i buy another ipod touch, i want AIM and facebook notifications to run in the background.</p> <p>rimplestultskin</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[rimplestultskin]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4602225</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:13:54 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4602184</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I understand caveat emptor ... and the power of the purse in chosing what works best for you.  Fine.  But to develop an emasculated (ow!) SDK and then have apple apologists argue that it's a GOOD thing is beyond stupid-it's downright embarrassing. Let the customer make her choices-don't deny capability based on considerations about "slow down" or the UI experience  Gawd-and that's believing the rationale.  The real deal?  Apple doesn't have it together re: multi-tasking like, say, the N82.</p>
<p>There's this power user's browser called Firefox.  Now, you can have ALL sorts of extensions added to it that can hog memory, not release it, cause some compatibility problems ... and guess what?  Users BECOME aware of the trade-offs and behave accordingly.    This is an essential problem I have with some apple products: there may be an overall vision trying to be achieved, but it comes at a steep price.  It's called lack of CHOICE.  Bottom line?  I should be able to chose whether or not to run multiple apps in the background EVEN if they slow the phone down.</p> <p><a href="http://">lianna_g</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[lianna_g]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4602184</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:11:08 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4601696</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>This kinda destroys MobileScrobbler - one of the best applications out there. Apple will have only itself to blame.</p> <p>politik</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[politik]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4601696</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:28:49 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4601432</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>HAHAHAHA....ahh, apple fan boys, have fun with that...rotfl</P> <p>kleene</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[kleene]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4601432</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:08:06 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4601054</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4596126">pushlatency</a>: Now I dont feel like I am the only one who thought or atleast has a feeling that Gizmodo turned into a huge apple fan boy site.</p>
<p>I know Apple is a great company, and some of their products are amazing. But their products are completly products of planned obsolescence and honestly, i understand they are a company, but they need to make sure they don't release products that are 60% of a product.</p>
<p>I don't understand why sometimes many people buy these products that lack the major features, such as 3G! Do you really think there is going to be anything else that will be new when they release it? I doubt it.</p>
<p>I am just really tired of all the apathetic views that many blogs are taking towards Apple. I know I am going to get stepped all over for this by our dearly apple fanboys.</p> <p>extremer</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[extremer]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4601054</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:37:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4600931</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Thank God for my E90.</p> <p>MrThunderfield</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrThunderfield]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4600931</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:28:35 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4600777</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>True pre-emptive multi-tasking is <B>sooooo</B> 1985 Amiga 1000 in 256K of RAM. Why allow programmers to re-live those memories?</P> <p><a href="http://www.sanitypages.com/">Monty</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monty]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4600777</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:17:25 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4600329</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4597150">KCooL81</a>: "Throw a preference at it" is rarely a simple solution and never the right one.</p> <p><a href="http://toastradio.com/">someToast</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[someToast]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4600329</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:48:07 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4600259</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Theres nothing preventing them from giving these privileges to an iChat or AIM, something they've tested out.</p>
<p>I'd hate to find out I missed some important calls because the game I downloaded left some process running that ate up my memory or something.</p>
<p>Anyway I'm sure the iPhone hackers will see this as a way to redirect their efforts. They can provide access to some background time for people who would choose to install it.</p> <p>stwf</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[stwf]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4600259</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:44:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4600178</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Wait, isn't the IM app native from Apple? So won't that be able to run in the background possibly? It sounds like this article is treating it as a 3rd party developed app, but from what I remember it was announced yesterday as a new feature with the 2.0 update, wasn't it?</P> <p>fumducket</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[fumducket]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4600178</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:38:55 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4599950</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Hahhah.</P>
<P>"Other than IM, what other application needs to be constantly running at the background?? "</P>
<P>War driving and GPS apps come to mind.</P>
<P>But more importantly it is this: it's my god-damned phone. Don't tell me what or how or when to run apps.</P>
<P>You APPL users need to stand up for your rights. You act like getting screwed is an honor. It's not.</P> <p>olafson</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[olafson]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4599950</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:27:35 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4599898</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I would've loved to see the headline, chopped pic and witty remarks of a post concerning the same issue with a MS product. I imagine it would've been a lot less forgiving...</p>
<p>As for the issue itself. What's so hard about just putting a "warning" up that says "hey dood, if you run all this crap your phone will run like shit. Wanna deal with it? Yes/No". Crippling users is just stupid.</p> <p>BoinK</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[BoinK]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4599898</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:24:42 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4599715</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p><b>"users should not feel that leaving your iPhone Application and returning to it later is any more difficult than switching among applications on a computer"</b></p>
<p>Here's the problem with this statement:</p>
<p>based on the logic above - on a computer - I would have to quit out of Photoshop in order to checkl my mail from Apple's Mail.app_  Then when I go back to Photoshop I would have to relaunch it every time_</p>
<p>I have never had to do this on a computer_  But from what the rest of the above article says - that's exactly what takes place on a desktop computer_</p> <p>uberfu</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[uberfu]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4599715</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:14:30 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4599708</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I for one think this is a good move.</p>
<p>And it doesn't mean Apple won't make exception to Yahoo or Google or Skype to make their chat client  running at the background.</p>
<p>Other than IM, what other application needs to be constantly running at the background?? HTTP FTP server and P2P client are just not making sense to me....</p> <p>pipper</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[pipper]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4599708</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:14:15 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4599668</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>oh well. you take it like it is. no one, not even the jobsinator is perfect. i think that my blackberry is superior just because i have large fingers and the touchscreen does not like playing nice</P> <p>landstryker53545</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[landstryker53545]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4599668</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:11:59 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4599239</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4598224">lucky_you</A>: i have one</P> <p>kezratt1</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[kezratt1]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4599239</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:52:42 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4599194</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4594756">zeropoint.0</A>:</P>
<P>They should make the phone with enough memory in there to run apps in the bg.</P>
<P>The iPhone just SUCKS period!</P>
<P>BB8320 Live Long and Strong!</P> <p>kurrupt_1</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[kurrupt_1]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4599194</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:51:29 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4599175</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4594912">Buran</A>: awwwww... its o.k.</P> <p>kezratt1</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[kezratt1]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4599175</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:50:44 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4599139</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>come on, you know some one will hack around this. Or create an app that contains the processes as 1 virtual process, I dont know the execution of this but I know in theory there has to be a way to get around that limitation.</p> <p>odnet</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[odnet]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4599139</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:49:13 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4598812</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Well this is no way changes my app, since calls, in addition to 20% battery warning and user input, cancel the application out.  I could see this sucking for some developers developing multi-application packages that depend on one another.  Now if only Apple would send me the f-ing authorization to be a full on iPhone developer I would like to be able to test my shit on the iphone since the Aspen simulator is lacking in certain features....</p> <p><a href="http://">thechansen</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[thechansen]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4598812</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:37:32 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4598806</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p><b>He said it himself, "a web-based chat application in Safari"</b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.meebo.com/">WWW.MEEBO.COM</a> <b>FTW!!!</b></p>
<p>I am in no way affiliated with Meebo, I am just a user who wants to spread the good word.</p> <p><a href="http://">easy2panic</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[easy2panic]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4598806</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:37:08 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4598798</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>What happens if you start listening to music then open an app? Does it not let you start or just stop playing music?</P> <p>gamecrazychris</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[gamecrazychris]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4598798</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:36:58 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4598741</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Should be an option to run up to 3 programs in the background. Case solved. Fuck off.</P> <p><a href="http://www.godmode.com">Stacky Botrus</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacky Botrus]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4598741</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:34:45 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4598594</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Sucks for demanding users (such as the ones that grace the pages of Giz). Good business move though.</p> <p>shorty63136</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[shorty63136]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4598594</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:29:17 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4598264</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Palm PDAs use a similar model - only one app runs but exiting an app and returning are seamless - the app will reopen exactly where you left off so such a model is managable and fairly usable.</p>
<p>However, these days it's pretty inexcusable.  My N95 runs several native apps and Java apps at once and is still perfectly usable - it just kills apps as memory runs out.  Even my sister's Sony Ericsson feature-phone can run a few Java apps at the same time.</p>
<p>If they are claiming it's to stop calling and such from being affected then just reserve memory solely for that.  Since this thing is supposed to be running OS X this sounds like a pretty pathetic limitation.</p>
<p>How much do you want to bet that big development companies with flagship products will be allowed to get around this?</p> <p><a href="http://www.sparx104.co.uk">sparx104</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[sparx104]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4598264</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:20:16 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4598246</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>My guess is that apple will create a native iChat themselves and release it. And it will run full time like SMS and Email.app</P> <p>Andr3w</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andr3w]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4598246</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:19:31 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4598224</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4594690">kezratt1</a>:</p>
<p>YOU'VE NEVER USED ONE</p> <p>lucky_you</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[lucky_you]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4598224</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:18:58 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4598012</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4597126">newgalactic</a>: I have to apologies, I didn't mean to make my previous post such a shameless M$ plug.  They've got plenty of issues.</p> <p>newgalactic</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[newgalactic]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4598012</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:11:28 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4597535</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>No multi-task? LAME. Utterly lame.<BR>I mean, what is this?! 2005?</P></BR> <p>NightBlade</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[NightBlade]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4597535</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:55:01 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4597491</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>That is only one of the many drawbacks of the SDK. The SDK is a major step forward, but let's hope competition doesn't let Apple keep their walled garden forever.</p>
<p>iPhone SDK: 5 Reasons to Love, 5 Reasons to Hate<br>
<a href="http://gonnected.blogspot.com/2008/03/iphone-sdk-5-reasons-to-love-5-reasons.html">[gonnected.blogspot.com]</a></p> <p>jwsheffield</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[jwsheffield]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4597491</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:53:54 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4597287</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Just an example of the Multi-tasking capabilities of the Nokia N82.....Beautiful !<br>
<a href="http://thesymbianblog.com/2008/03/05/multitasking-n82/#more-494">[thesymbianblog.com]</a></p> <p>nikeplr</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[nikeplr]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4597287</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:47:18 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4597282</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I call bullshit. Unix has had a 'process manager' for DECADES now. There is no reason why certain apps can't have more priority than other apps when they are running concurrently.</p>
<p>Your phone app has top priority. But, when your not in a call then it doesn't need to have top priority. So something else can have the CPU.</p>
<p>Likewise, if something is in the background--like an AIM client--it will have a lower priority than everything else.</p>
<p>This is not hard to do. They already have the Unix back end. Just start using CPU management--or any other CPU management, really--and you are good.</p>
<p>This is just pure laziness on Apple's part. That, or they want to push their own apps rather than user-created apps.</p>
<p>"Look! That IM client can't stay open! But ours can! Buy it now!"</p>
<p>And yes, they have done that before.</p> <p>dragonphyre</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[dragonphyre]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4597282</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:47:09 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4597211</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>One more thing...</P> <p>mkrygeri</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[mkrygeri]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4597211</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:44:28 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4597150</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Here is a simple solution to this problem:</p>
<p>All programs should close out entirely on exit by default.</p>
<p>There should be a section in settings where you could chose which programs would run in the background on exit.</p>
<p>There should also be a disclaimer that says "If too many programs are running in the background, your Jesus phone  will die of memory starvation"</p> <p>KCooL81</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[KCooL81]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4597150</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:42:08 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4597144</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Hehe, Palm OS is better than the iPhone. Sure, it's ugly, but dang it, I can run my chat app in the background!</p> <p>packetsniffer</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[packetsniffer]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4597144</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:41:56 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4597126</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I see the problem, and it's a real one.  But I would hope Apple could come up with a more creative solution then "eliminating all multitasking for 3rd party apps".  Goodness, that's a newbie developer kind of issue.  I guess that's why I've never seen as many issues with Windows OS, I tend to close apps that I'm not currently using.  I can see this happening on the iPhone when Luddites leave every app installed running at the same time.  Maybe limit 3rd party apps running in the background to 1 or 2.</p> <p>newgalactic</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[newgalactic]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4597126</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:41:16 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4597054</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>This is like handcuffing your lover just so they won't mess up your hair.</p> <p>Brookespeed</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brookespeed]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4597054</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:38:57 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4596936</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>My suggestion? Take a page from their own UI book.</p>
<p>I think they should give the (power) user the option. Because if they ticked "check the network every 30 seconds", they've opted in for the performance hit.</p> <p><a href="http://">iomatic</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[iomatic]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4596936</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:34:42 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4596923</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>There still might be hope for IM applications.  I used one on the Palm a few years ago under similar limitations.  PalmOS is, effectively, a single-app-at-a-time operating system, too.  Fortunately, it allowed apps to hook into certain system events.  In this case it was SMS.  Part of the IM app ran on your phone and part ran on a centralized server.  When the server sensed an incoming IM, it would send you an SMS, the Palm app would be hooked to receive this (and prevent it from going to your actual SMS application), then inform you that that there was an IM waiting with a popup dialog (kind of like the meeting alarm popup dialog.)</p>
<p>I haven't dug into the Apple SDK, so have no idea if a similar architecture is possible on the iPhone.  I'm just saying: don't cry about IM being impossible until people have explored all of the possibilities and loopholes in the official SDK.</p> <p><a href="http://netninja.com">Brian Enigma</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Enigma]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4596923</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:34:29 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4596847</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4596649">Gadgetdon</a>: This is no time to be reasonable. We are talking about Apple here!!! Please understand this is Apple we're talking about and alter your response to appropriately OVERREACT and GO CRAZY and say it's THE WORST THING EVER or THE BEST THING EVER!!!!!!!!!</p> <p>frigg</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[frigg]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4596847</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:32:10 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4596649</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>It's not that the user shuts down the application, it's that when the user picks, say, mail, your program is told to shut down NOW, saving the state you were in.  Then, when the user chooses your app, you reopen it and restore the state it was in.  Fast save and startup is mandatory.  (Which is a good thing to push in any case.)</p>
<p>Most applications don't need to be running in the background. IM is an exception.  An interesting issue would be someone doing an MMO (or a real-time multiplayer game).  This is one they definitely would NOT want to make an exception for, given how much weight an MMO has.</p>
<p>There are compromises in the SDK design, and in the distribution design.  As much cool stuff as I've done in the pas with background apps, I understand why they're doing it and it's probably the right thing to do.</p> <p><a href="http://www.domesticatedarcades.com">Gadgetdon</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gadgetdon]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4596649</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:27:02 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4596590</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Whaa...??!!!!!</p>
<p>You mean the iPhone won't fly around your head on its own solar-powered telepathic telemetry, changing colors as it monitors synaptical activity across your forebrain??!! Huh????</p>
<p>Typical Apple, introducing a great SDK and then HOBBLING IT by omitting a full-featured, solar-powered, color-modulated, user-driven head-fluttering feature. Thanks, Apple! Thanks alot.</p> <p>frigg</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[frigg]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4596590</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:25:05 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4596564</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Symbian rules in this area, I'm reading this page on my Nokia e90, listening to tunes and have my IM app open in the background.</p>
<p>My battery life lasts all day.</p> <p>kevininstereo</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevininstereo]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4596564</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:24:05 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4596503</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Lol! This is just crap! Muahahahahahaha !</p> <p>hofodude</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[hofodude]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4596503</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:22:13 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4596330</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4596126">pushlatency</a>: You're right, it's about what works and what doesn't (I used WinMo exclusively for about a year). I know why Apple did it, and it's a good choice for them because they want to make sure everyone, not just the tech people, get a good experience on their phone. Makes sense.</p> <p><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com">Jason Chen</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4596330</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:16:31 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4596210</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>this constraint wont be for everybody and probably wont last.  Apple is clearly concerned about stability and perception of the phone.  the os is capable, but one bad app can make the whole os/phone/apple look bad... remember, with great power comes great responsbility ... and the average developer doesn't exhibit much responsibility, so Apple's taking on that role for them</p> <p>jaizone</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[jaizone]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4596210</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:12:33 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4596126</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4594842">extremer</a>: I'm with you, Gizmodo is taking a pretty apologetic stance here and I don't think Apple deserves the treatment for this decision.  It's unfortunate that forcing a set of training wheels on the experienced end of iPhone's user base is a defensible action.</p>
<p>Furthermore, Chen is pretty off about Windows Mobile.  It's only marginally passable as an OS out of the box in most cases, you make it better by installing third party apps and loading modified and tweaked ROMs onto your device.  The key here is learning what works and it's not really that tough.</p> <p><a href="http://www.aeri.org">pushlatency</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[pushlatency]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4596126</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:09:40 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4596044</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4595800">CarbonatedWater</a>: Probably.</p>
<p>But until it's clarified when iPhone 2.0 arrives with some of the hottest smartphone applications on the market, it's fire and pitchforks time.</p> <p>Marty_MacFly</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marty_MacFly]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4596044</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:06:17 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595855</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4595074">Pantone</a>: Following this logic we'd all still be using line commands to do everything because icons and pointers make it easy for dumb people.</p> <p>Sihanouk-s-Poodle</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sihanouk-s-Poodle]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595855</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:59:19 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595800</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I'm not sure but I think Apple will end up granting certain applications the ability to run in the background.</p> <p>CarbonatedWater</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[CarbonatedWater]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595800</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:57:21 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595783</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I have the perfect solution for everyone complaining about running more than one program at once... DON'T BUY THE IPHONE. If you have it, sell it and get a windows mobile phone if you want a slow ass phone to run a bunch of crap that you don't need to constantly have open. It's NOT for everyone. Sheesh.</p> <p>KeithJ</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[KeithJ]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595783</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:56:47 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595741</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>funny, most apps on our Blackberry are not worth running</P> <p><a href="http://www.rainydaymagazine.com">RainyDayInterns</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[RainyDayInterns]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595741</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:55:51 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595701</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4595536">teexcue</a>: I experience this on WM, but I don't get prompted until I'm struggling.</p> <p>Kaiser-Machead</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaiser-Machead]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595701</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:54:26 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595691</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Since developers are aware of it from the start, I don't see what the problem is.</p>
<p>"It's important to make sure that users do not experience any negative effects because of this reality.  In other words, users should not feel that leaving your iPhone application and returning to it later is any more difficult than switching among applications on a computer."</p>
<p>It's up to them to design around it.</p> <p>Marty_MacFly</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marty_MacFly]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595691</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:54:07 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595663</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Why would you have to exit out of one app to switch songs or stop them? Doesn't the iPhone/iPod touch have a double tap feature that brings up a quick control window?</p> <p>Kaiser-Machead</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaiser-Machead]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595663</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:53:23 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595629</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>That's really dumb. It makes more sense to set a maximum RAM usage. Once that limit is met you could be prompted to close some programs to make room.</P> <p>chrisaroz</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[chrisaroz]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595629</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:52:21 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595608</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>How long until someone cracks that no-running-in-the background limitation? When (not if) that happens, shall we call the workaround install app "Detention Break"? :)</p>
<p>I am sure Apple knows it will be hacked but this way they get to avoid any culpability for slow-down or stability issues introduced and they can look the other way (like with iPod applications that allow copying) to allow people to use background-run processes as best works for them.</p> <p>Vagabum</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vagabum]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595608</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:51:42 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595573</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Anyone have any idea how much less battery life we'll all get after all these apps start coming out? It sucks because you can't exactly change the battery.</P> <p>Noobs-R-Us</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noobs-R-Us]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595573</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:50:36 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595565</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn't say the sky is falling just yet when it comes to IM on your iPhone. Considering how chummy Apple and AOL are when it comes to iChat on Macs, it's safe to assume that Apple will have a similar first-party IM app come June that will run in the background on the iPhone. It wouldn't make sense to have the IM app running at all if it doesn't run in the background.</p> <p><a href="http://startplaying.blogspot.com">djkibblesnbits</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[djkibblesnbits]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595565</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:50:25 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595539</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>funny, I can run lots of apps on my Blackberry 8830 without problems.</p> <p>isawdrones</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[isawdrones]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595539</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:49:28 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595536</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>My old SE W810i had trouble running more than 3 apps at once, but once a phone call came in, or if I wanted to use the camera, it would tell me to close an app so it would free up system memory. I don't understand why Apple can't build in the same feature?</p> <p>teexcue</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[teexcue]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595536</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:49:20 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595488</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>I wander over here from Deadspin, so I've only half paid attention to all this, but will all these apps work on the iPod Touch as well? (not AIM and other web connected ones, obviously)</P> <p>Chowday</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chowday]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595488</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:47:53 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595417</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595014">CColdsmoke</A>: @<A href="http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595074">Pantone</A>: @<A href="http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595112">Mokers</A>: <BR>I think that only third party apps can't run in the background. Native 1st party apps from apple should still be able to run in the background, so you can switch between mailer &amp; ipod no problem, but if you switch from a third party app to ipod the third party app will have to close. That is the difference.</P>
<P>There will likely be a hack that will change permissions so you can run your third party app in the background...</P></BR> <p>stopcrazypp</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[stopcrazypp]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595417</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:45:31 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595410</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4595081">JaggedToaster</a>: Good question. No clue!</p> <p><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com">Jason Chen</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595410</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:45:09 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595334</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>ahahahaa man this sucks!<br>
i will definitely be sticking to my jailbroken iphone.</p> <p><a href="http://www.funvampires.com">hanspecans</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[hanspecans]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595334</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:41:56 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595256</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Oh for heck, Bad bad bad. lets see what this eliminates:<BR>-Samba (server)<BR>-FTP (server)<BR>-HTTP (server)<BR>-Skype (client)<BR>-other IM (client)<BR>-Non apple email (client)<BR>-antz (game)<BR>-summerboard (theme manager)<BR>-free will to make anything cool and server integrated.....</P>
<P>Really, have we gotten soft? just because it has an apple logo on it we accept it as gospel, as for our own good? bah. no thanks, I'll keep jailbreaking till it gets so out of hand that apple just has to cave.</P></BR></BR></BR></BR></BR></BR></BR></BR></BR> <p><a href="http://">Tensaisama</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tensaisama]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595256</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:38:57 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595194</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>It's out, just be glad. Maybe someone will come up with an app that let's you run other apps ... and perhaps secret apps that will let you get priced apps for free ;)</p> <p>Earthslide</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Earthslide]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595194</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:36:21 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595112</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Also, does it say specifically that you can't change songs? Right now, if you are in an App like mail and your iPod is playing, you double tap the home key to bring up the iPod player and it allows you to change songs and volume. I figure this will be available to third party apps since they get the SDK.</p> <p><a href="http://www.mokers.org/blog">Mokers</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mokers]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595112</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:33:25 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595081</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>So why exactly does clicking the Digg button above lead to a different - yet identical - submission? Stupid.</p> <p>JaggedToaster</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[JaggedToaster]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595081</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:32:31 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595074</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>This is only bad the way I look at it... Obviously having multiple third-party programs running in the background will slow everything down. But limiting us to only one background process at a time? They are basically saying they have no faith in their customers and will take the easy road in preventing future complaints. Yes, they will succeed at their goal and have less complaints in the long run, but at the expense of what? Is this really the direction we want to move towards? It's like a dumbing down of society...</p> <p>Pantone</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pantone]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595074</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:32:16 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595014</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>I can't talk, text, IM, and drive at the same time?</P>
<P>But I can still IM people from the toilet and ask them to guess where I am. Then follow up with a new buddy icon using the phone's camera.</P>
<P>That's all the multi-tasking I really need. If I want to do everything from the throne, I'll just buy a laptop.</P> <p><a href="http://">CColdsmoke</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[CColdsmoke]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595014</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:30:28 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595012</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4594758">Aubin</a>: i hope they do. the purpose of IM is to be able to get messages as if they were text messages in my opinion. having to stay inside AIM is a huge limitation and to be honest a huge turn-off with the whole thing.</p> <p><a href="http://">MadColombian</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[MadColombian]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595012</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:30:18 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4595006</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4594920">s017jrs</a>: My impression was that it was an AOL-coded app, but Apple could give it some special permissions to have it always run in the background. That's a possibility.</p> <p><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com">Jason Chen</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4595006</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:30:10 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4594971</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Eh. Would rather have battery life than keep a bunch of apps running in the background. The thing I need a persistent connection for most is e-mail. Besides, it's not like people are going to stop hacking the iPhone software. If you desperately need background access, I am sure somebody will think of it.</p> <p><a href="http://www.mokers.org/blog">Mokers</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mokers]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4594971</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:29:14 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4594966</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Well this is the main reason why windows mobile is slow so I can see why apple is trying to avoid it. There are usually a crap load of background apps running in winmo that slows it down. But no multitasking at all with 3rd party apps really is going to put a damper on things regardless.</P> <p>stopcrazypp</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[stopcrazypp]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4594966</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:29:08 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4594920</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Someone will hack that out... <BR>Besides that, isn't the IM app an apple coded app, not 3rd party? That would give it background privilidges, right?</P></BR> <p><a href="http://www.dailyclimber.com">s017jrs</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[s017jrs]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4594920</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:27:42 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4594912</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4594690">kezratt1</a>: Then why are you here?</p> <p>Buran</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buran]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4594912</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:27:30 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4594885</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4594758">Aubin</a>: I sure hope so. IM is the app I really want. If they can't get IM to always be listening, then what's the point of using the official app? MobileChat manages to stay in the background just fine and as long as they can stop the random disconnection problem I'll keep using it. Oh, and popup notifications that pop up no matter what you're doing, like SMS notifications do.</p> <p>Buran</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buran]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4594885</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:26:48 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4594852</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Man that sucks that you can't just leave IM on all the time. I loathe win mobile, but advantage MS here. Well actually, advantage RIM.</p> <p>SchruteBuck</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[SchruteBuck]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4594852</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:26:03 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4594842</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I like how Gizmodo defends the decision made by Apple, but when Microsoft does the same thing, they are scolded.   Just something I've noticed while trolling on the site. I am not a MS Fanboy by any means.</p> <p>extremer</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[extremer]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4594842</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:25:53 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4594795</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4594743">Noobs-R-Us</a>: Well, you should be able to listen to music while doing the other apps, since the iPod app can run in the background. You'll just have to quit out of your other app to change songs.</p> <p><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com">Jason Chen</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4594795</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:24:37 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4594785</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>It's really funny how Apple can one minute present an amazing SDK which gives unlimited power to developers, only to kick information out like this killing everyones hopes. I hope they change this and maybe add some type of restriction to this in the future. I was really looking forward to running AIM on my phone all the time.</p> <p><a href="http://www.blachole.com">blachole</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[blachole]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4594785</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:24:25 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4594758</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I think it's worth noting that something like an AIM client will probably not be treated as just another "third-party" application.</p>
<p>I imagine it's one of the bigger post-SDK releases, and Apple already works with AOL on iChat so they'll probably allow backgrounding or something like that.</p> <p><a href="http://www.punknews.org/">Aubin</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aubin]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4594758</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:23:25 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4594756</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>i've already been having problems with my iphone slowing down at times. As much as I hate the idea that I can have at least one background app running, i like the idea they are conserving memory this way.</P> <p><a href="http://">zeropoint.0</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[zeropoint.0]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4594756</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:23:19 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4594743</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Well, it's good AND bad. Good in that you don't waste battery power and all of the processing power is dedicated to the app you're working on at the moment. Bad in that you can't listen to music while using these other apps.</P> <p>Noobs-R-Us</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noobs-R-Us]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4594743</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:22:56 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4594690</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>OVER-RATED PHONE</P> <p>kezratt1</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[kezratt1]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4594690</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:20:58 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4594671</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>RAWR.</p>
<p>MAOW.</p>
<p>grr?</p> <p>tyner100</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[tyner100]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4594671</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:19:58 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[iPhone SDK Limitation: Only One User-Made App Running Concurrently, No Background Processes]]></title>
		    <link>http://gizmodo.com/365327/iphone-sdk-limitation-only-one-user+made-app-running-concurrently-no-background-processes#c4594635</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Sheesh, this isn't good. I can't believe I didn't expect this, but its a decently major hit.</p>
<p><a href="http://digg.com/apple/iPhone_SDK_Limitation_One_User_Made_App_at_a_Time">[digg.com]</a> it up.</p> <p>JaggedToaster</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[JaggedToaster]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">4:365327:c4594635</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:18:51 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>