<![CDATA[Behold the "Access," Samsung's First Mobile TV Phone With AT&T - Gizmodo Comments]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Behold the "Access," Samsung's First Mobile TV Phone With AT&T - Gizmodo Comments]]> http://gizmodo.com Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:50:17 EDT Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:50:17 EDT http://gizmodo.com/373200/behold-the-access-samsungs-first-mobile-tv-phone-with-att <![CDATA[Behold the "Access," Samsung's First Mobile TV Phone With AT&T]]> http://gizmodo.com/373200/behold-the-access-samsungs-first-mobile-tv-phone-with-att#c4926186 Riqgeez, the entire point of this phone is so that AT&T can have a lower-end phone that supports Mobile TV. People who want a higher-end TV phone will obviously be drawn toward the Vu.

Not every phone in a carriers line-up can be an 8GB 5MP full-touchscreen MP3-playing TV-watching wonderphone. Some phones need to be cheaper; that doesn't mean they "SUCK!!!!!!!!!"

Gizmog

]]> 4:373200:c4926186 Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:50:17 EDT <![CDATA[Behold the "Access," Samsung's First Mobile TV Phone With AT&T]]> http://gizmodo.com/373200/behold-the-access-samsungs-first-mobile-tv-phone-with-att#c4914584 ONLY A 1.3 MP CAMERA!? SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!

riqgeez

]]> 4:373200:c4914584 Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:13:39 EDT <![CDATA[Behold the "Access," Samsung's First Mobile TV Phone With AT&T]]> http://gizmodo.com/373200/behold-the-access-samsungs-first-mobile-tv-phone-with-att#c4913729 Where do I plug in the antenna?

JChristopher

]]> 4:373200:c4913729 Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:37:23 EDT <![CDATA[Behold the "Access," Samsung's First Mobile TV Phone With AT&T]]> http://gizmodo.com/373200/behold-the-access-samsungs-first-mobile-tv-phone-with-att#c4912267 But...they've sent out a press release...those are press photos.

And if Gizmodo removed the pics, I assume that they would actually...remove them. And maybe let us know why, too.

I'm guessing someone at the Giz just screwed up. It's okay, we don't mind, but I'd really like to see the other pics! ;-)

Gizmog

]]> 4:373200:c4912267 Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:10:23 EDT <![CDATA[Behold the "Access," Samsung's First Mobile TV Phone With AT&T]]> http://gizmodo.com/373200/behold-the-access-samsungs-first-mobile-tv-phone-with-att#c4911644 I assume that pictures are unavailable because Samsung gave you a cease & desist letter.

Feeling high and mighty Samsung?

drcullex

]]> 4:373200:c4911644 Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:21:09 EDT <![CDATA[Behold the "Access," Samsung's First Mobile TV Phone With AT&T]]> http://gizmodo.com/373200/behold-the-access-samsungs-first-mobile-tv-phone-with-att#c4910635 Now that CA. and other states will have the no phone while driving in effect on July 1st, why does this seem so "Not a big deal". You are going to watch it where? at home where your bigger TV is? Or At Work with your boss standing around? or outside in the sun and daylight? hmmm...I just think it's old tech is all. I'm just saying....so what..? Portable TV's have been around awhile, okay, it has a phone too...happy?
I guess I don't see the big deal, It's me I know!

Faslane

faslane

]]> 4:373200:c4910635 Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:28:31 EDT