Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

Amazon Says 'Extensive' Fraud Allowed Cybercriminals to Siphon Cash From Seller Accounts

An Amazon fulfillment center in Baltimore, 2017.
An Amazon fulfillment center in Baltimore, 2017.
Photo: Patrick Semansky (AP)

UK legal documents obtained by Bloomberg show that e-commerce titan Amazon fell prey to “extensive” fraud that allowed cybercriminals to obtain access to around 100 seller accounts and transfer cash into their bank accounts, with the company confirming to the news agency that it had completed an investigation into the incident.

Advertisement

Amazon lawyers wrote in the document that they believe the fraud took place over a time period from May 2018 to October 2018, with attackers managing to change banking credentials associated with Seller Central accounts to ones they controlled at Barclays Plc and Prepay Technologies Ltd., Bloomberg reported. From there it was simply a matter of initiating transactions to drain the accounts, with the stolen cash coming from both sales proceeds and Amazon-backed business loans.

In the documents, Amazon attorneys requested a London judge to allow searches of statements for the Barclays and Prepay accounts. They acknowledged that the two institutions “have become innocently mixed up in the wrongdoing,” Bloomberg wrote, but added such access was necessary “to investigate the fraud, identify and pursue the wrongdoers, locate the whereabouts of misappropriated funds, bring the fraud to an end, and deter future wrongdoing.”

Advertisement

Amazon’s legal team wrote in the documents that they believed information necessary to break into the accounts was obtained via phishing attacks. Thus the incident is not necessarily due to any vulnerability in Amazon’s systems. It’s not clear how much money was stolen (though it was presumably a lot).

Amazon has had a contentious relationship with some third-party merchants on its platform, with complaints of one-sided contracts, disputes over ads for products that don’t make Amazon money, and a reports of a viciously cutthroat environment where merchants compete for digital real estate and Amazon makes summary judgments with an iron fist.

Vendors have reported incidents of Amazon pushing them out of the third-party Marketplace, where they can control prices, into vendor roles in its wholesale supply chain (and vice versa). Other reports have indicated that Amazon has launched investigations of whether its own employees have sold sensitive business data on the side to merchants looking to game the system. With the possibility of the company facing antitrust action at some point seemingly growing, Amazon and its CEO Jeff Bezos have at times appeared to be on the defensive, touting robust Marketplace sales as evidence it is not too powerful.

[Bloomberg]

Advertisement

"... An upperclassman who had been researching terrorist groups online." - Washington Post

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

I think a LOT of folks forget that there was NO Amazon Marketplace for a long time, and that most of their complaints come from products sold through 3rd parties. Vendors also pull dirty tactics...like changing a listing for a flashlight with hundreds of positive reviews to a crappy thing that doesn’t work. And vendors break rules all of the time...like I STILL get offers to do product reviews “for 100% rebate of product cost once review has been approved,” despite the fact Amazon has banned the practice of free product in exchange for reviews. IOW, in a lot of ways, 3rd party vendors are Amazon’s albatross, and I do not blame them for deciding to phase out that portion of their biz, a portion they really don’t need, and has a questionable ROI.

If KMart decided they no longer wanted to carry generic kitchen appliances, but stick to brands like Kitchen Aid, Hamilton Beach, etc., would we hear the same outcry?

My comment applies to that last paragraph of this article...the weakness in the payments system is awful.  If it happened to the affiliate link folk, like Kinja Deals, there would be HUGE backlash.  But as it seems to have only hit those vendors they want to start phasing out, this almost gives them more fodder to actually phase out the 3rd party vendors.