Around 25,000 Barrels of Suspected DDT Has Been Found Off the California Coast

Heat map showing the concentration of targets found on the seafloor.
Heat map showing the concentration of targets found on the seafloor.
Image: Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego

A known DDT dump site off the coast of Southern California is considerably larger than suspected, in a discovery that’s sounding the alarm bells.

Advertisement

Finding 2,500 barrelswould’ve been a lot. Same for 250 barrels. Heck, even the discovery of 25 barrels at a former DDT dumpsite would’ve been upsetting. But 25,000 barrels? That’s astonishingly awful and unquestionably scary.

But such is the result of a recently concluded survey led by the University of California, San Diego’s Scripps Institution of Oceanography. From March 10 to 24, a team of researchers mapped 36,000 acres across a stretch of seafloor between Santa Catalina Island and the Los Angeles coast. This area was previously identified as a hotspot for DDT—a notorious pesticide that’s now banned around the world owing to its toxicity.

Back in 2011 and 2013, David Valentine, a research scientist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, detected concentrated levels of DDT in sediments at this location, along with 60 barrels suspected of containing DDT-laced sludge. Alarmingly, other scientists detected elevated levels of the toxic chemical in dolphins and sea lions.

That this Southern California ocean basin should yield some toxic waste is hardly surprising, though the new estimates of how much is there is nevertheless shocking. The dumping of industrial waste began here during the Great Depression era, while archival shipping logs from a waste disposal company suggest 2,000 barrels of DDT-laced sludge were dumped here every month from 1947 to 1961, according to a Los Angeles Times investigation. Industrial companies continued to use this area as their toilet until the enactment of the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act, also known as the Ocean Dumping Act, in 1972.

To get a better picture of how many barrels might actually be located in this area, the Scripps Institute, in partnership with NOAA’s Office of Marine and Aviation Operations and the National Oceanographic Partnership Program, organized the new expedition. Riding aboard the R/V Sally Ride, the team of 31 scientists, engineers, and crew used a pair of robotic subs equipped with sonar to scan the bottom at high resolutions. One at a time, the subs slunk to depths reaching 3,000 feet (914 meters), scanning the equivalent of 140 football fields each hour.

“We couldn’t keep up with the flow of data coming in,” Eric Terrill, the leader of the expedition and a scientist at Scripps, told the Los Angeles Times. The team found a massive debris field littered with more than 100,000 individual objects. In total, they gathered more than 100 gigabytes of data, requiring a specialized algorithm to make sense of it all.

Advertisement

Nearly 25,000 items were confidently identified as being barrels, both because of their unique sonar signature and the pattern of distribution along the seafloor. The team says this number could be as high as 27,000, or even higher, as the computer algorithm may have missed barrels partially buried in sediment.

“There are several distinct track-line patterns in the surveyed area, suggesting that the dumping was repeatedly done from an underway platform such as a moving ship or barge. Some of those lines are as long as 11 miles [18 kilometers] and approach state waters,” explained Terrill in a Scripps Institute press release. “While our mapping sonars cannot measure the contents inside the barrels, the target locations are consistent with the previously identified dumpsite and extend much further than we expected.”

Advertisement

Indeed, many objects were detected outside of the dumpsite limits, including areas a mere 12 miles (19 kilometers) from Los Angeles, and 5 miles (8 kilometers) from Catalina Island.

“The uniquely high body burden of DDT in top predators feeding in Southern California waters has been known for some time,” Lihini Aluwihare, a geoscientist and chemical oceanographer at the Scripps Institution who wasn’t involved with the expedition, said in the press release. “The extent of the dumping ground helps to explain some of these previous observations.”

Advertisement

At a Congressional briefing held Monday, Sen. Dianne Feinstein said she will ask the Justice Department to name the companies that might be responsible for the illegal dumping of waste, and then determine if “they can be held accountable,” the Los Angeles Times reported.

This finding should ideally instigate the development of an action plan to deal with the situation, such as finding a safe and effective way of removing the barrels before they leak any further. Scientists should also study the potential effects of DDT on the food web to assess the chemical’s ongoing influence in the ocean.

Advertisement

More: ‘Underwater roombas’ help start cleanup of decades-old toxic waste dump along California coast

Senior staff reporter at Gizmodo specializing in astronomy, space exploration, SETI, archaeology, bioethics, animal intelligence, human enhancement, and risks posed by AI and other advanced tech.

DISCUSSION

szielins
Stephan Zielinski

This might be a big deal, or it might be a nothingburger—because a little DDT isn’t a big deal, while a lot is a big problem.

The LA Times article ( https://www.latimes.com/projects/la-coast-ddt-dumping-ground/ ) includes

He called Montrose, and to his surprise, the staff pulled out all their files. He and a team of regulatory scientists combed through volumes of shipping logs, which showed that more than 2,000 barrels of DDT-laced sludge were dumped each month. They did the math: Between 1947 and 1961, as much as 767 tons of DDT could have gone into the ocean.

So how much is that compared to how much we produced and used before the ban? From Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDT#Production_and_use

From 1950 to 1980, DDT was extensively used in agriculture – more than 40,000 tonnes each year worldwide[15] – and it has been estimated that a total of 1.8 million tonnes have been produced globally since the 1940s.[1] In the United States, it was manufactured by some 15 companies, including Monsanto, Ciba,[16] Montrose Chemical Company, Pennwalt,[17] and Velsicol Chemical Corporation.[18] Production peaked in 1963 at 82,000 tonnes per year.[5] More than 600,000 tonnes (1.35 billion pounds) were applied in the US before the 1972 ban. Usage peaked in 1959 at about 36,000 tonnes.[19]

In 2009, 3,314 tonnes were produced for malaria control and visceral leishmaniasis. India is the only country still manufacturing DDT, and is the largest consumer.[20] China ceased production in 2007.[21]

The most recent number I’ve found for India is from an article from 2017, with the last number in it being from 2014: https://malariajournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12936-017-2050-2

Since 2003, there have been three countries reporting production of DDT: India, China and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPR Korea). During the period 2003–2007, average production was 5144 metric tons per annum, but during the period 2008–2014, average production was 3491 metric tons p.a.—a decline of 32% during the 12-year period (Fig. 1). India has been the largest producer of DDT, with production still ongoing.