No. We acknowledged that a sharper display is a nice and welcome improvement (especially when compared to the previous generation of iPhones), but we never claimed it was the greatest thing to ever happen in technology.
Adrian Covert
acovert31
Sub-pixel rendering is proving itself to be increasingly important when it comes to the sharpness of text.
We have not denigrated the display once. We're simply questioning the active marketing of absurd ppi figures. If its the case, so be it. We just dont want companies trying to claim that their display is better simply because of some ungodly ppi figure. Read more
I hope so.
Thank you.
Well with SLCD3, you're not talking about resolution, but the panel itself (and yes you want that). But wanting a 1080p display on a smartphone just because it's 1080p is dumb. It's wasted on anything under 40 inches. You really can't tell the difference over a 720p display unless you have your nose to the screen. Read more
oh also this: http://gizmodo.com/5561351/the-iphone-4-retina-display-controversy
We actually called the retina terminology "marketing hype" when it was first announced. But it became a defacto standard on its own.
a) http://gizmodo.com/5557210/what-is-the-iphones-retina-display b) http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review
Why?
RT itself isn't that bad as a tablet OS. The web browser is PRETTY GOOD when it comes to page rendering and what not. I don't like the onscreen keyboard as much as the iPad, but things like app switching are superior IMO.
Not a new idea, no. But if Apple actually coded Mountain Lion itself to support the drive, it could be more effective than just plopping a Seagate Optimus XT in your computer.
CHAI SEASON
Michael Strahan and Matthew Perry
Omar Gooding and Kevin James
It's no pizza.net
Only if it does anal.
Giancarlo Esposito and DJ Qualls
youre on to something here.
Alfonso Ribeiro and Michael Fassbender