Thank you, but I believe the correct designation is actually 53240/2022-085B. Making the fix, appreciate you bringing this to my attention.
Thank you, but I believe the correct designation is actually 53240/2022-085B. Making the fix, appreciate you bringing this to my attention.
I think you’ve got the wrong comments section?
It’s worth pointing out that the Space Shuttle was capable of performing reboosting duties, as was ESA’s now-retired Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV). The Russian Zvezda module is currently capable (after Progress pumps fuel into Zvezda and undocks from ISS). Before Zvezda, this was done by the Zarya module.
I did mention that Progress vehicles are currently being used as ISS boosters, but perhaps I should’ve been more explicit about how they’re exclusively being used for this task. That said, I was very clear in my article that the reason for the Cygnus test is that, with the Russians potentially leaving, NASA needs a… Read more
>That does seem like quite a few issues. Read more
Oh, for those wondering what the difference is between spinosaurs and Spinosaurus: the first describes the group whereas the latter describes the genus. And not all spinosaurs fall under the Spinosaurus genus.
Wow, very astute observations. I appreciate the head’s up—fixes made.
I didn’t mean to imply that a nuclear weapon was used, my apologies. I’ve altered the blurb to convey the “gray” area that is anti-satellite weapons.
The video is not from the recent attack—it’s from a failed bear attack dating back to 2018.
The plan is to make them biodegradable.
And what makes you think I’m not excited for new developments? My frustration is directly related to my excitement for this mission, and how Inspiration4 is not using technology to bring their experience closer to home—because, let’s be honest, this sort of thing won’t be accessible to 99.999% of us.
The term “unconditional safety” is from Roscosmos, so something may have been lost in translation.
You are right, decimal error. Now fixed.
I support this.
To be fair, though, Huber has a lot of experience with this sort of thing, and I can only assume he documented things according to spec, and took all precautions when recovering the artifact.
Yep, I caught that, and also the keys that have clearly been cleaned to show the letters. Don’t love that.
I like where you’re going with this...
Arg, now fixed. Thanks for the head’s up.
Cool idea.
I actually asked Westbury this very question, but I excluded his remark for brevity. Here’s how he responded: Read more