I know I'm the perpetual architectural wet blanket around here, but I've seen second year studio presentations better than this. I hope this was someone just messing around in Revit/ Sketchup or something. The scale of that drawing is completely messed up. I probably wouldn't have shifted around the same background in every camera view either.
30' spans of unsupported glass flooring = flexural failure FTL.
Thin glass bearing and shear walls = inevitable evisceration win.
I won't even get into solar gain.
I understand the point of a creative exercise, but this idea is played out. See Philip Johnson's Glass House of 1949 (and notice how it was actually built, unlike this).