Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

Twitter Mulls Redesign That Looks a Heck of a Lot Like Facebook, Just With More Neo-Nazis

Illustration for article titled Twitter Mulls Redesign That Looks a Heck of a Lot Like Facebook, Just With More Neo-Nazis
Photo: Matt Rourke (AP)

Twitter will be rolling out beta updates including “conversational”-style speech bubbles and indented/color-coded replies based on whether you follow another user in the coming weeks, the Verge reported on Wednesday. Other features under consideration, but which will not be available in the forthcoming beta, include green-colored status availability icons that might indicate whether a user is online.


Screenshots posted by Twitter’s director of product management, Sara Haider, to the site illustrate what these changes like. Pretty much anyone who has already gone down the Twitter rabbit hole—something that as a longtime user of the platform I cannot, in all honesty, recommend—will be familiar with the competitor this looks almost exactly like: Facebook. Just, you know, cropped to leave out the hordes of neo-Nazis, trolls, and white supremacists that continue to flood Twitter.

Screenshots of a potential Twitter redesign.
Screenshots of a potential Twitter redesign.
Screenshot: Sara Haider (Twitter)

Once you see it, it’s hard to ignore. This looks like Facebook, except on Facebook you usually only have to put up with someone using the display name Reich_Daddy_420 if they’re your great aunt’s second cousin or venture into your private message requests or something.

The intent of these changes would obviously seem to be amping up user engagement. That’s something that would be required for Twitter to maintain its streak in Q4 2018 of actually making a profit for once, despite apparently hitting a wall on U.S. user growth. Other features under development like “ice breaker” tweets, the Verge wrote, are also apparently intended to encourage more conversations on the site:

Another feature that could roll out in the future is “ice breaker” tweets, which are supposed to help start a conversation about a specific topic. Users would be able to post their own ice breakers for others to respond to. An additional feature would let people attach tags to their tweets that explained what they were in reference to, like a TV show.

While Haider wrote in her tweet that the changes were intended to “make it feel more conversational here,” they also take the site further away from its original conception as a strictly linear flow of posts—somewhat along the lines of its much-maligned decision to inject algorithmically curated tweets into feeds. And conversations are all well and good, except if the one of the people having the conversation is you and the others are the aforementioned hordes of Reich_Daddies.

A BuzzFeed News report on Wednesday emphasized that Twitter’s infamously spineless “abuse report infrastructure remains opaque and sometimes confounding,” and reports of the site failing to take action on even the most cut-and-dry issues of harassment continue to mount up. As BuzzFeed noted, an editor at American Jewish magazine Tablet, Yair Rosenberg, recently reported a user with a bio reading “Account for my son Yair Jr controlled by @yair_rosenberg.” Rosenberg reported a tweet from the account with swastikas photoshopped over a photo of a baby for what seemed like cut-and-dry violations of policies on abusive behavior and impersonation, receiving a prompt reply that said: “We reviewed your report carefully and found that there was no violation of the Twitter rules against abusive behavior.”


[The Verge]

"... An upperclassman who had been researching terrorist groups online." - Washington Post

Share This Story

Get our newsletter


Honestly, as someone with a Twitter account who barely uses Twitter, I would appreciate a more structured way to follow and engage in threads. The current free-for-all timeline view is messy and difficult to parse at times. And engaging with others often requires reliance on formatting tricks. Putting aside all of the issues with both platforms and just addressing the usability of the interfaces/structures, engaging with content and other users on Facebook is better IMO. Following the thread of a conversation, and the branching comments that may ensue, is much easier with a structure that anticipates interaction. On Twitter it feels like an afterthought, a side effect of the platform’s original intended use of broadcasting your thoughts to an audience. Two-way interaction has been shoehorned in and it’s clunky at best.