One of the worst parts of pet ownership is leaving your dog or cat home alone. They’re stuck in the house, and you’re out in the world! Pet cameras are ostensibly a great way to watch and interact with pets even when you’re away from home. While they used to feel like a kludgy gimmick that can’t rival a real security camera, pet cameras have improved dramatically in the last three years, so we grabbed the top three to see how well they hold up against a popular security camera to find the best camera for your pet monitoring needs. Going into testing, I assumed the security camera, the $200 Nest Cam Indoor, would win. I already use one to check on my dog, Igloo, when I’m away. I really like how it alerts me if he barks or breaks out of his kennel, but shuts off as soon as I’m back in the house and connected to the same wifi. It’s handy, and I just couldn’t see how the pet-specific tricks of pet cams could really add that much more value. Pet cameras are alternatively called treat cameras because, in addition to monitoring an area via camera and letting you speak through the built-in speaker, they also let you chuck treats at your pet’s face. We selected the $200 Furbo, the $180 PetCube Bites, and the $150 Petzi. They’re three of the most popular cameras available. To figure out which was the best, we tested to see which has the best app, which has the best audio and visual quality, and which is best at tossing those threats. Which has the best app? All four cameras require that you regularly interact with their apps, so it’s crucial that they work well. Surprisingly, given that it’s supposed to be so sophisticated, the Nest app is miserable to use. Checking on video can be slow and unintuitive, you can’t easily record video, and you’re tied into Google’s ecosystem, which isn’t ideal for those concerned with privacy. It’s still better than Petzi’s app. The Petzi app is barebones. It’s super easy to share pics of your pet with other Petzi users, but you can’t set up notifications for noise or movement. The only camera settings you can adjust are toggling the night vision feature and changing the volume of the speaker. Petcube and Furbo both have significantly better apps, but the PetCube Bites had more connectivity issues in my experience, and features like alerts are behind a paywall. The Furbo app is better at connecting, provides more alerts for free, and has a much more intuitive layout. Winner: Furbo Video and audio quality The camera and speaker on a pet camera need to be good. You should be able to see your pet clearly, with few digital artifacts. When you talk to your pet, you need to sound like yourself. Otherwise, your pet is more likely to be scared than comforted by your disembodied voice. The poor Petzi was immediately at a disadvantage because it only shoots in 720p while the other three cameras do 1080p. It also took multiple attempts to speak to my dog through the camera, even when it was connected to the same network. I’d press the speaker button and nothing would come out. Plus I sounded terrible. The PetCube Bites also struggled to send my voice consistently. Its video was sharp, but it had a weird green tinge. The Nest had decent video quality, and I sounded great most of the time. Sometimes it wouldn’t transmit my voice though. Worse, there were occasions when it would clip my voice, leading to choppy and unpleasant audio. Here, again, the Furbo just worked. The video was consistently clean with few artifacts, and when I spoke, I sounded like me. Best of all, I could actually get the speaker function to work every time, something every other camera failed to do. Winner: Furbo Treats Flinging treats is what sets the pet camera apart from something like the Nest. While you can create a treat camera using a Nest and some engineering, that’s not doable for most people. So the Nest instantly loses this battle, leaving just the Petzi, Furbo, and PetCube Bites to compete. The Petzi had the smallest reservoir for treats and tended to shoot out the most treats with each toss. That means you have to refill it every day. And while it’s easy to access the reservoir when the camera is wall mounted, it’s a major frustration if you have it set on a mantle or shelf. The Furbo can’t be wall mounted out of reach of pets, but it has a much more solid base than the Petzi. That means when you shoot a treat, and your 74-pound dog comes to the investigate, he’ll be less likely to knock it over with all his sniffing and licking. The Furbo is the only cam that consistently shoots just one treat at a time, it’s easy to reload, and it makes a little alert noise every time it shoots. When I reviewed edits of the video above, my dog came over every time he heard the alert. While the Furbo is extraordinarily competent, the PetCube Bites is even better in the treats department. It’s a little top heavy, which means pets can knock it over, but it’s also wall-mountable, and its reservoir is amazingly easy to access. The reservoir is also the largest of the three, and it’s slightly translucent so you can see how many treats you have left without opening it up. But the best part of the Bites is how you can control how many treats you toss and how far you toss them via the app. No other treat camera gives you that degree of control. Winner: PetCube Bites Winner Winner The PetCube Bites is easily the best pet camera for treat flinging, and the Nest is still the best for pure security, but it’s clear that the Furbo is the best overall camera for monitoring your pets. While it didn’t win the treats battle, it still did quite well, and it had the most intuitive app and most consistent video and audio quality. It’s also easy to record videos to send to others. Plus it looks more attractive than the other three cameras. Overall, it’s the most well-considered and feels like it was built for the explicit purpose of helping you interact with your pet while you’re away from home. Winner: Furbo
