Gizmodo 
Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editor:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Chris Jacob
Email
Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email
Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
11/05/09
11/05/09
I foresee many GPS vs. Android comments here, but I think it's not necessarily a fight to the death. There is obviously a market for both, and it's a matter of each providing flexible featuresets that offer additional added value that benefits the intended user. Could phone-based GPS eventually supplant dedicated units? Possibly. But, I see the dedicated GPS companies crossing over before any final "death blow" is dealt. #ecoroutesesp
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
I have a Garmin 750, and it is very useful, especially in Canada, where I refuse to turn my data roaming on. I can still navigate, and know the speed limit wherever I am. But honestly, if I had a Droid, I wouldn't need the Garmin for trips inside the US.
The point of Google Nav isn't that it's going to kill dedicated GPS units, it's going to force them to innovate. This is a perfect example. Here's a GPS that does much more than a smartphone easily could.
Garmin and TomTom et al need to come up with things for their devices to do that go far beyond the capabilities of a navi-phone. Like HUDs, integration with a non-navi smartphone, using its data connection to download free traffic data, etc. #ecoroutesesp
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
To sum up, I doubt Garmin or Tom Tom are getting coffin fittings, but I would place substantial bets that they are having lots of meetings and conferences to see what they can do to shore up their value-added revenue stream. #ecoroutesesp
10/31/09
This seems so half assed, I still have to carry my Garmin. Does Verizon intentionally block the app during a phone call? If so that sucks.
11/01/09
10/31/09
This is probably the stupidest thing I've ever read in a Giz review. Here's a question, did you ever consider that they didn't knock everyone off the mountain and if you don't like the Google app you can spend money and buy another app or navigator?
Or is it that since it's free and it's from Google you feel the right to be extra critical and bitch about it?
10/31/09
Fact of the matter is, if this thing were widely available (on all Android phones, but especially when and if it makes it to the iPhone), that would be a huuuge dent in the mobile GPS unit market. For the outdoorsy types who would like navigation on the mountains, sure they'll still buy a TomTom. For the ditzy mom that gets lost in traffic downtown? Not so much. This app will do just fine. And you know those giant cities with thousands of people sporting expensive gadgets? Guess which of those two categories they have more of?
Giz is full of a lot of hype. The Apple Tablet rumors are example enough of just how out there their claims can get. This, though? This is dead. on. And no, they don't "feel the right to be extra critical and bitch" because "it's free and it's from Google". They're being critical because that's what they do. This is a software review! What else are they supposed to do? #googlenavigator
10/31/09
I understand that they are supposed to be critical. I usually like Giz reviews. In fact, with anything I am going to purchase techwise, I find info/reviews on Giz.
This was just a crappy review, in my opinion. #googlenavigator
10/31/09
Wait a sec; your take on this is that the author was merely exercising scrupulous diligence? With no overt bias, whatsoever? So, then, you would disagree that he underwent a sea-change in sentiment - accompanied by a charming reversion to adolescent phraseology - at the mere _possibility_ of finding Google Nav on his iPhone? To wit...
'Still, if this was built in to the iPhone's Google Maps, or offered as a free download at the App Store, damn would it steal customers like a mofo. [...] really, this thing would—and probably will—swallow the GPS app market alive.'
For those keeping score at home: the app he calls 'good for free, but far from perfect' will - only if and when it receives the Jobsian imprimatur - 'swallow the GPS app market alive' plus 'steal customers like a mofo'. Seriously, OCEnt, this passage strikes you as critical analysis, rather than...say, the ecstatic babbling of a self-absorbed twit with an Apple/iPhone fixation?
10/31/09
As for the claim that it will only be successful when it reaches the iPhone (not exactly what he said, but we'll go with it).....the iPhone has 50 million users! This is an app not a device! Even if 2.0 makes it to all Android phones, that's still a much smaller percent of the market than the iPhone (so far). I actually can't stand the iPhone and really think Android doesn't get the real attention it deserves. Yet, I can't ignore the fact that even if every single Android user was using this app in place of a Garmin or TomTom unit (such a universal is impossible, but I'll give it to you), we still wouldn't be enough to swallow the GPS unit market. Combined with iPhone users, and yes all the new Android users will see in the coming years, that is a force to be reckoned with. That is, simply logistically, what could make this app a threat. It has nothing to do with iPhone fanboyism. The app needs a platform.
And besides, even if it is fanboyism (it's not), that still doesn't mean the critiques of the software are wrong. A piece of software can be good, powerful, and popular while being far from perfect. Gmail, Windows. Heck Gizmodo even.
There's a place for accusations of bias and unfair critiques. This review? Not one of them. #googlenavigator
10/31/09
For a free beta that will be available to all Android phones running v2.0?
Well, bravo for your hard ass stance and demanding attitude toward reviews. No doubt you have taken exactly this cynical, 'glass half empty' approach in any number of pithy iPhone critiques, over the past two years. I mean, I'm sure you'd do that despite being an enthusiastic Mac and iPhone user yourself, right? Please post links to those, when time allows.
10/31/09
10/31/09
10/31/09
10/31/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
1. listening to music: assuming you can multi-task the gps and music capabilities. does the app pause music to announce the next segment of the trip?
2. does the display dim if not connected to a charger? any night mode? #googlenavigator
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
OK. That's more than one question, but you get my drift.
If it has Flash, that would be a nice difference from the iPhone. #googlenavigator
10/30/09
10/30/09
Google is the new Microsoft (but in a good way). #googlenavigator
10/30/09
10/30/09
Besides, it's far from being free if it's a feature of the device it's shipped on. Oh, sure, you might not have to pay an additional premium to use it, but the people that'll get to use this first plunked down hard cash for an Android device.
There's nowt wrong with constructive criticism. It's one thing to say "it's crap", but stating why it's crap is a whole 'nother level, and any software engineer worth his/her salt is usually happy to receive the latter rather than the former. #googlenavigator
10/30/09