Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
@ripfire: but that's just it.... "keeping it steady" is 95% of actually aiming any weapon.. especially one that's 3 miles away mounted to a large vibrating aircract moving at 200mph, and keepingit aimed over that period of time to a tolerance of a few inches... pretty impressive.
try keeping your later pointer aimed at a 12" box from a fotoball field away from a moving car and how easy it is to aim with any accuracy, then imagine it being 17 times further
That video looks like it was fast forwarded. How long does it really take to fry a truck? It seems like a huge plane following some small vehicle for 15 minutes, slowly heating it with a laser, would be the most awkward battle ever.
@switchblade saints: agreed. If that laser were hot enough to burn through the steel truck hood, you'd think we would have heard and seem some loud stuff going on there, because the power involved would force something to crack, or warp signficantly.
The accuracy is probably more impressive than the power though. (Then again a stationary target with a high contrast black box painted on it, and it didn't even hit the middle of the box... if we're picky)
You have that kind of aiming system, probably better off firing a rail gun at it or something.
@dcartist: Aiming is actually easier than it looks. Try it for yourself: take a laser pointer and aim it somewhere really far away. It's not that hard. Only thing you have to worry about is keeping it steady.
@weatherman: I think you're confusing the Airborne Laser (ABL), the multi-billion dollar missile defense project, with the Airborne Tactical Laser, which this is.
@icelight: yes, the two are very closely tied. In my mind the ATL is really just an attempt to spin off another use for the same technology in order to justify spending the eight billion dollars on the ABL.
I bet if they just put some light wight fiberfrax or durablanket on that.... or a mirror you could defete this billion dollar weapon for less than 100 bucks
The sizzling sound that the truck makes is hair-raising. Also, notice that you can't hear the plane (Hercs have a distinctive sound signature). They don't state the range that the laser's being fired from but I imagine that the plane's not very close.
@gallahad: actually, I just did the math and 20km is 12.4 miles. Which is about 2000 feet outside of national airspace, which basically means that if North Korea took all their missiles to the very edge of their shores and decided to launch them right there, we might just be able to hit them if we just happened to be flying at just the right time and just the right place.
I know, I'm exaggerating slightly, but this has to be the one of the biggest boondoggles in military spending ever. The whole program stinks of corruption intended to get Boeing a peace of the Star Wars spending. Pew, pew indeed.
@weatherman: You're talking about a different laser. The AC-130 one is an entirely different system with a different purpose in mind (attacking ground targets). The missile one is on a 747. According to wiki, the 747 system isn't practical for ground targets because the plane flies much higher than an AC-130 would. And, because it's higher, it has a longer range... wiki says the design specification is 600km. Whether or not is actually works, though, they're still learning a lot about lasers and you can be sure that knowledge will find its way into other things.
this has nothing to do with the post but do u guys remember wen there was a post with a pic on how to fix a computer and it said look it up on google or something, does anyone kno what im talking about and could give a link or something?
@Interstella5555: no smartasses i tried looking it up on google it was a picture with a diagram i think and it pretty much said use google and i think it also said now ur the office tech guy or something along those lines
I saw in a movie (some chick flick I think) where an artist ran metal rods into sandy soil to act as lightning rods. After the lightning stuck them, it melted the sand into glass that had shapes with beautiful patterns that this reminds me of. So stark and jagged, yet so lovely and perfect.
This is not complimentary of our DoD's abilities. It's like when one kid can't think up a good enough comeback his face turns red, he screams in frustration and then fists start flying. Use your words, America.
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
If Luke Skywalker was there, he would have been all like vermmm vermmmm whooooaaammm and totally block that laser with his lightsaber.
10/02/09
try keeping your later pointer aimed at a 12" box from a fotoball field away from a moving car and how easy it is to aim with any accuracy, then imagine it being 17 times further
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
The accuracy is probably more impressive than the power though. (Then again a stationary target with a high contrast black box painted on it, and it didn't even hit the middle of the box... if we're picky)
You have that kind of aiming system, probably better off firing a rail gun at it or something.
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
I'll take 7000 cruise missiles, 300 Reapers and 15,000 Hellfire Missiles instead, please.
10/02/09
10/02/09
Yeah, but then you'll be shooting cruise missiles and I'll be like "I"M FIRIN' MAH LAHZER!!"
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
They can shoot people with sound, that shouldn't be beating lasers dammit.
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
I know, I'm exaggerating slightly, but this has to be the one of the biggest boondoggles in military spending ever. The whole program stinks of corruption intended to get Boeing a peace of the Star Wars spending. Pew, pew indeed.
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
[www.youtube.com]
10/02/09
09/14/09
that pic tho is pretty sweet
09/14/09
www.google.com
09/14/09
[lmgtfy.com]
09/15/09
09/15/09
[gizmodo.com]
09/14/09
09/14/09
07/14/09