This was not a good week on social media for writer E.L. James of Fifty Shades of Grey and would-be Presidential candidate Gov. Bobby Jindal. Both took to Twitter to answer fans’ questions. But they are controversial figures online, and the majority of Tweets were delightful take-downs that burned so good.
First up: E.L. James. The author is loathed by vocal segments of The Internet; James haters are legion. You can hate her for her painfully bad writing, which wouldn’t fly in a freshman comp class. You can hate her for the fact that Fifty Shades began as fanfiction of Stephenie Meyers’ Twilight. Or you can hate James for inaccurately depicting BDSM and for framing the abusive relationship between the two protagonists as the height of romance. Take your pick! Twitter users on #AskELJames certainly did.
https://twitter.com/embed/status/615596252378611712
Are you going to answer any of these questions, or do you need Stephenie Meyer to do a Twitter chat first? #AskELJames
— beth (@bethorne) June 29, 2015
https://twitter.com/embed/status/615790073632571394
https://twitter.com/embed/status/615579525896744960
https://twitter.com/embed/status/615627318954979329
https://twitter.com/embed/status/615622576757440516
https://twitter.com/embed/status/615578089511190528
#AskELJames are you aware that eyebrows can't actually do this pic.twitter.com/5Fc6PI67ug
— Knives 🗡️🔪 (@feartheflerken) June 29, 2015
https://twitter.com/embed/status/615595127499792384
https://twitter.com/embed/status/615590884730650624
i see people complaining about the #AskELJames tweets being "rude" or "hating", but all i see are truth bombs and a sea of truth pudding.
— 🩷 Rebekah Weatherspoon Book Updates! 🩷 (@RdotSpoon) June 29, 2015
You should check out the hashtag, which has provided days of endless entertainment and is still going long after James’ PR team cherry-picked some softball questions to answer.
Some James fans were upset about the ridicule sent in the author’s direction. I think she’s more than a fair target—the majority of Tweets criticized James’ writing style and characterizations, which are valid subjects for a writer who has earned upwards of $90 million from her work. Debates over the way Fifty Shades portrays the relationship between clueless, virginal Ana Steele and the brooding, stalker-y billionaire Christian Grey have swirled in online communities for ages, gaining strength again this year when the Fifty Shades film came out. Since James’ latest book Grey retells the story through Christian’s eyes, long-simmering concerns found a new outlet in the Q&A.
You can read more about “50 shades of abuse” here (I’ve also written about the disturbing themes in Twilight, upon which Fifty Shades was originally based). This is an instance where Twitter mobs are raising awareness through irony rather than getting out their pitchforks for no reason.
A similar movement of derision to expose hypocrisy was in action for Bobby Jindal’s Q&A disaster. It appears that Jindal’s PR people missed the James kerfluffle, because on Tuesday they asked Twitter to leave town hall questions for the Governor of Louisiana under the hashtag #AskBobby. Peruse Gawker’s amazing tag for all the Jindal coverage you can shake a Bible at.
Jindal is widely known for his anti-science views and mixing a hardline Christian rhetoric into politics; both have earned him a history of internet scorn. He is fiercely opposed to reproductive rights, marriage equality, and immigration reform, but he believes in demonic possession and exorcisms. Unsurprisingly, #AskBobby did not go as planned.
Did Jesus ride dinosaurs with or without a saddle? #AskBobby
— PatrickIsMaHomie (@CubsChamp2016) June 30, 2015
Let's all #AskBobby how his policies have left Louisiana women without basic reproductive care. #NotMyCandidate pic.twitter.com/JPlO7laqKt
— Planned Parenthood Action (@PPact) June 30, 2015
https://twitter.com/embed/status/615995459631489025
Lmao why are all of your self-portraits of a strange white man? #AskBobby @BobbyJindal pic.twitter.com/EP94kFh6Xp
— ✨ (@KW33NSOHI9H) June 30, 2015
https://twitter.com/embed/status/616285427956187136
https://twitter.com/embed/status/616274520740077568
My neighbor is a kind, hard working, undocumented immigrant contributing to society in a positive way. Where can I report him? #AskBobby
— Chase Brignac 🚀 (@chasebrignac) July 1, 2015
https://twitter.com/embed/status/616235960058146816
https://twitter.com/embed/status/615995527109476352
https://twitter.com/embed/status/615978100019601408
When are widely disliked famous people going to learn how Twitter works?!? #AskBobby
— Dr. Katie Kaufman Rogers (she/her) (@drkatierogers) June 30, 2015
We hope the answer to that is never. This material is gold, and exactly what Twitter was made for. While it is unlikely that either James or Jindal had to sift through the negative Tweets themselves, many a headline has since been generated about the real questions people wish they would answer.
In these cases, the sub-narrative created by Twitter users became the dominant reported story—with attempts at self-promotion washed away in a wave of truth-telling and 140 character-shots fired.
