A Spy Plane That Surveilled an Entire City for Police Is Now Being Promoted as Way to Monitor Cops

Less than two years after an aerial surveillance company was caught using a spy plane to record the entire city of Baltimore for police, the so-called “eye-in-the-sky” system is being pitched to the city with a new angle: catching corrupt cops.


Persistent Surveillance Systems’ cameras flew over Baltimore in secret for much of 2016, filming hundreds of hours of footage before a Bloomberg story exposed the privately-funded pilot program and prompted major backlash. The program was subsequently ended, but amid a series of corruption convictions for Baltimore police officers and a spiking murder rate, Mayor Catherine Pugh told The Baltimore Sun she would consider putting the spy plane back in the air if there was considerable community support.

“If the community asks for this and the community wants this and the police department feels it’s a good tool, I’m listening,” said Pugh.

Persistent Surveillance Systems offers a video of its Hawkeye II camera array—designed to be attached to the bottom of a small aircraft—in action:

Adapted from tech developed to track insurgents in Iraq, the company’s surveillance sensor flies roughly 8,000 feet in the air, using a bank of 12 cameras to capture roughly 32 square miles of the ground below each second. A comprehensive review of Baltimore’s use of the persistent surveillance system from the Police Foundation details its disturbing capabilities. Though the cameras usually fly thousands of feet above ground, they can, for example, follow a single suspect’s every move, down to the second:

Illustration for article titled A Spy Plane That Surveilled an Entire City for Police Is Now Being Promoted as Way to Monitor Cops
Screenshot: Police Foundation

The system used in 2016 didn’t track suspects automatically, the report says. Instead, PSS analysts had access to 911 calls and manually tracked movements in target locations using images sent from the spy plane, forwarding relevant information to police. Surveilling public areas doesn’t require a warrant, so analysts were free to monitor any location they wanted to. In an unrelated pilot, Kentucky is exploring similarly deploying drones to neighborhoods following reports of gunfire.

What remains unclear is how aerial surveillance would either catch corrupt cops or restore community trust in the police.


In early February, two members of the city’s now defunct Gun Trace Task Force pled guilty to corruption charges, including racketeering and robbery. During their trial, both former and current Baltimore PD officials testified GTTF members stole money and drugs from suspects, lied to suspects about arrest warrants they didn’t obtain and defrauded the agency by falsely claiming overtime and vacation pay. Six other former members pled guilty to similar charges.

In a separate, but related, ongoing scandal, several of the city’s officers have been caught seemingly faking the discovery of evidence for body cameras. Last July, Officer Richard Pinheiro’s own body camera appeared to film him planting drugs he would later say belonged to a suspect. Since then, more than 50 cases involving BPD officers have been flagged for review, with some cases being thrown out entirely because they relied on body camera evidence. In August, Police Commissioner Kevin Davis issued a memo reminding all officers their body cameras must “capture all of the circumstances surrounding the recovery of evidence.” (Davis has since been fired.)

Illustration for article titled A Spy Plane That Surveilled an Entire City for Police Is Now Being Promoted as Way to Monitor Cops

“It’s a deterrent against crime. It’s a deterrent against police misconduct as well,” Archie Williams, a community organizer in favor of aerial surveillance, told the Sun. “You have grown men talking about, ‘I was afraid of the Gun Trace Task Force.’ They were out here traumatizing the community. Why not have the cameras turned around on them?”


Body cameras have certainly been used to catch cops breaking the law, but it has almost always been after local news outlets or defense attorneys obtained footage that contradicted officers’ narratives. It’s possible that a spy plane could similar catch officer misbehavior, but, in this case, the surveillance company and Baltimore officials would control the footage, not any watchdog group.

There’s no time table for when Mayor Pugh will issue a decision on the spy plane program, but the company told the Sun they have enough in private donations to fly over the city for a year.


[Baltimore Sun]

Of course I have pages. I had pages five years ago. How anyone can believe I don’t defies belief.


This technology may sound a bit Orwellian but it is also extremely useful in catching criminals. These systems have been proven to solve murders, kidnappings, armed robberies, and even used to prove the innocence of others accused of a crime.

This tech basically allows the police to “rewind” an entire day or even multiple days worth of aerial surveillance so they can track a single vehicle (or a person on foot) to see where they went. It is incredible technology that definitely deserves a conversation about the pros vs the cons. I can see both sides... I don’t want a police state either but with tight enough controls where a warrant is required prior to using the data collected and the data being restricted without one... I might be willing to see past the privacy argument if it starts to keep us safer.