Some of the biggest names in AI alarmed the country over the weekend with full catastrophe scenarios that can unfold if AI continues its unrestricted and light-speed pace of development.
On Saturday, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay warning against risks like bioterrorism and “serious economic disruption” that come with AI development and suggesting that the industry should slow down “the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models.” His essay came just days after his company began receiving intense backlash after a former Anthropic employee alarmed the internet with claims that “the people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.”
In a rare show of solidarity, both OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk voiced their support of Amodei’s essay. Altman even said that the current safety environment is factoring into the company’s decision to delay its long-awaited IPO until next year.
Some of the fears that Amodei laid out in the article have been shared by the public for some time now. Calls for increased regulatory scrutiny and stricter guardrails have been mounting as the AI industry contends with a major PR crisis. The technology’s reputation has floundered in the past few months as its impact on everything from warfare to the labor market, the environment, and even utility bills has gained more public recognition.
But politicians are saying no, both to regulatory scrutiny and to slowing down the rapid strides taken in AI development.
Chief among them is the ever AI-loving President Trump, who took to Truth Social on Monday to attack Amodei and to call the public opposition to unrestrained AI development “a SICK conspiracy” that only benefits China.
“The only control or “guardrails” that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the U.S.A. has that, in spades! The Trump Administration has stopped AI “people” from doing bad, or potentially bad, “things,“ like Dario (Anthropic!), who is now pretending to be a “perfect little angel” – and we will continue to do so!” Trump claimed in the post. “WHOEVER WINS AI, WINS! We are leading China, and all others, and will continue to do so. Conspiracy Theorists, Treasonists, Traitors, and Leakers, BEWARE!”
The standoff comes as the Trump administration is embroiled in a global effort to ease the burden of regulation on the AI industry. Earlier this month, global economic leaders from some of the biggest governments in the world met up in North Carolina for the G20 meetings. The Trump Administration ended the meetings by unveiling the Carolina Principles, a document that is basically asking the biggest global economies to promise a more hands-off approach to AI regulation. Top AI executives, including both Altman and Anthropic co-founder Tom Brown, attended the event for talks hosted by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.
The argument goes that governments should refrain from increased regulatory crackdowns, instead trusting the AI companies to fulfill their part to ensure safety, because if not, then China will beat the U.S. in the global AI race. But some experts say that weak regulations could lead to even worse outcomes than no regulation at all.
Anthropic isn’t the only AI company that took time this weekend to promise major slowdowns in AI development. Microsoft released a code of conduct on Monday promising to put limits on AI models, while Altman said in an interview on Saturday that OpenAI would pause more often during new model development.
“If you’re like ‘Oh, OpenAI is not going to pause because they’re worried about it costing their business money,’ you like very deeply misunderstand us,” Altman claimed in the interview.
At least some members of Congress seem convinced by these promises. On Sunday, House Speaker Mike Johnson pointed the finger at competition with China and said that Congress should refrain from AI regulation. Instead, regulators should just trust the AI developers to bear the responsibility for AI safety, Johnson says.
Meanwhile, China is also unhappy with the Anthropic CEO’s essay, specifically the part where he cautions against Chinese AI advancements. In the essay, Amodei says that AI development should be slowed down, but not so much that the United States falls behind the pace of development coming out of China. If China passes the United States to become the global AI leader, Amodei argues that will pose “grave danger” for the entire world and give Beijing the power to “militarily dominate democracies,” an argument that has strong advocates in Washington.
Over the weekend, Chinese officials published statements casting aside Amodei’s concerns about a Chinese advantage in global AI development as “fearmongering,” while themselves echoing similar worries about the use of generative AI technologies and its impact on China. In a public statement on Sunday, China’s spy agency, the Ministry of State Security, claimed that “hostile forces and people with ulterior motives” are utilizing AI to devise an “attack on public opinion and cognitive warfare against China,” according to the Financial Times.
All of these back-and-forth statements and codes of conduct will be coming to a head later this month when President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping meet in the United States on September 24. If the two governments can agree on an AI development deal, then both Xi and Trump should get a Nobel Peace Prize, Altman claimed on Saturday. And we all know how obsessed Trump has been about that prize.
