This is what i asked for. :D YAY

Nice...but couldn't you at least use a photo that is in focus a PMA article :-)

@RainyDayInterns:
It's called depth of field, boyee

yep

@NUMBER1FREDDY

uh duh...we were commenting on the choice of photo, not on fact that the photographer should have used a f11 with a flash... Number1Son.

@RainyDayInterns: I'm with Freddy, it's called depth of field little intern: It's obviously shot wide open with natural light. There's a huge drop off in focus, but the front of the lens (and all the finger wrinkles on the right hand -- eewwww) are in pretty good focus for what was obviously a quick and dirty hand-held while stopping at a show booth for a coople of seconds... but I guess some people are just natural complainers....

@RainyDayInterns: And what do you mean "we"? Your's is the only complaint I see there, MultiplePersonalityInternBoy....

@RainyDayInterns: You _might_ have legitimately commented on the white balance but, again, only if you're a picky-shit complainer....

Natural complainer???

There is nothing natural about it...we HONED this skill by reading and learning from lame-ass comments like yours :-)

@RainyDayInterns: Hahahahaha! Thanks for making my night! Glad to know I'm inspiring the younger generation in something....

Cheers,

Always fun hangout here on GIZ!

These PMA roundups are usually filled with soooooo much BS. Thanks Giz for cleaning that up.