• more about

    #internetexplorer8

    If You're Still Using Internet Explorer 6, You're Stealing Food from Starving People

    Microsoft Donates Eight Meals For Each Internet Explorer 8 Download

    Dean Cain Helps Us Overcome S.H.Y.N.E.S.S With Internet Explorer 8

    read more: #internetexploder, #internetexplorer8, #internetexplorer, #explorer, #microsoft, #browsers, #software

    Internet Explorer 8's Incompatability List Is Really Sad

    Microsoft's "compatibility list" of sites that don't render correctly in Internet Exploder 8 RC1—requiring some non-standards mojo from the browser to look right—numbers some 2,400. They're off-the-beaten-path sites like Amazon, Google, Microsoft and YouTube.

    Mary Jo Foley posted what looks like the entire list of broken sites, but here are some of the more ridiculous sites that don't display properly in IE8, and require it to render them old school style (aka not web standards compliant). Here are some of the more laughable ones.

    microsoft.com
    google.com
    yahoo.com
    cctv.com
    msn.com.cn
    live.com (a Microsoft site)
    wikipedia.org
    flickr.com
    wordpress.com
    adobe.com
    facebook.com
    apple.com
    youtube.com
    imdb.com
    thepiratebay.org
    dell.com
    netflix.com
    nytimes.com
    gizmodo.com (In case you're wondering why you have problems in IE at Giz)
    kotaku.com
    sony.com

    My eyes glazed over after a certain point, so if you see any other ridiculous entries, let us know in the comments.

    Microsoft is going to constantly adjust the list, taking off sites that become compatible with its default "standards mode," and adding sites that people complain about. Here's the list for Vista users, and for XP people. Aside from this tragically amusing compatability issue—which Microsoft totally brought on itself by making Internet Exploder completely ignore web standards for years—IE8 is actually much better than IE7, and worth taking a look. [ZD Net]


    Send an email to matt buchanan, the author of this post, at matt@gizmodo.com.