I've been holding off on getting an HDTV for quite a while. I currently don't have a TV. I watch all of my TV and play all of my games on a 24" 1920 x 1080 monitor. I watch all of my TV online currently.
I want an HDTV. But I don't want one too big. 40" looks just about right for what I want. I want to be able to watch some movies, TV and play some games. I do want it to be 1080p. Some people say you can't tell the difference, but I honestly can.
I know that as soon as I get one, though, the price will drop. :(
Question, how often would it be reasonable to replace a HDTV? I have a 50 inch Sony KF-50WE620, which I kinda want to replace but it feels wasteful (and wasteful I am not!), so what do you think?
In my case, I'm very glad I got a plasma. No matter where you put the furniture you still get a good picture and our room isn't so light that an LCD's brightness would be an advantage.
@oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo...: Not at all - I just got my new 42" plasma last week and it weighed the same as my old (very old, so heavier than they are now) 36" LCD.
Picture is fantastic, especially considering I got it under $600 shipped. Thanks, Dell!
@oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo...: There are pluses and minuses for each type. Burn in really isn't much of a problem anymore, but why worry about it if you like the LCD's picture well enough? I don't play games on that TV and mostly watch movies and TV so a plasma works for me.
@oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo...: burn in was the case for 1st gen plasmas. I have a Panny Plasma and game MW2 all the time for hours at a time. Not a trace of burn in.
@oo: Now with fewer o's: They're heavy. My 50" weighs in at 70 lbs. But, I don't know about being super cautious moving it. I just bought a stand that it mounts directly to to stabalize the unit and voila.
@Bizdady: @Lite: hates Illinois Nazis: @mikecoscia: thanks guys I honestly had no idea. We are looking at new tv's for the living room. wont be buying till march or so but plasmas are back on the consideration list now.
@ooooo: You can get image persistence on lcd also. It happened to my monitor but it's not permanent like burn in and there are ways to correct it (which takes a while).
@ripfire: yeah I mention that in a previous comment, I was saying Id take persistence over burn in dollar for dollar. but if burn in really isn't an issue any longer. Does plasma only have weight as a con now? I may have to actually read this guide.
Really the only drawback I've seen from modern plasmas is they're power hungry compared to modern LCD's. But, you can get a good sized plasma for less than the equivalent LCD as well.
@Lite: hates Illinois Nazis: yeah Im gonna go eye shopping. Honestly I may have to go cutting edge and get a super thin samsung. they are really pretty on a wall.
Back then, I remember recommending lcds to my friends and families. Then lately, I ended up with a plasma (Panny pz800). :P The quality is just too good for the price.
@MichaelScrip: "Oh come on! People have been complaining that Blu-Ray players are too expensive... now they demand Blu-Ray burners now?"
Yeah, filmmakers need them and use them. A Blu-ray burner lets you make one-off BDs (and regular DVDs) for prototyping/proofing or just plain ol' gift giving.
Blu-ray burners do exist for Macs/PCs, they're just currently priced around $400-600. That's why I was SO excited about what at first sounded like a an internal BD burner...but, alas, is only a player. Great news for those folks who have a computer hooked up to a TV-ish display and want to, as you say, "get their feet wet with Blu-ray" movies, just not so helpful for content creators (or data backup).
11/19/09
11/19/09
I want an HDTV. But I don't want one too big. 40" looks just about right for what I want. I want to be able to watch some movies, TV and play some games. I do want it to be 1080p. Some people say you can't tell the difference, but I honestly can.
I know that as soon as I get one, though, the price will drop. :(
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
Of course, I bought a Samsung pn50b650 Plasma for $935... But, seriously, this would have been helpful!
11/18/09
I live in an apartment, so it's maybe a 20-step walk to my TV. I think I'll hold off on another TV for a while.
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
Picture is fantastic, especially considering I got it under $600 shipped. Thanks, Dell!
11/18/09
11/18/09
#tips
11/18/09
#tips
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
#tips
11/18/09
11/18/09
#tips
11/18/09
Really the only drawback I've seen from modern plasmas is they're power hungry compared to modern LCD's. But, you can get a good sized plasma for less than the equivalent LCD as well.
11/18/09
#tips
11/18/09
Back then, I remember recommending lcds to my friends and families. Then lately, I ended up with a plasma (Panny pz800). :P The quality is just too good for the price.
11/18/09
11/16/09
11/26/08
11/26/08
11/26/08
11/26/08
11/26/08
11/26/08
11/26/08
11/26/08
11/26/08
* sigh *
Still maybe a good deal for many folks, just not what I am looking for.
11/26/08
11/26/08
Oh come on! People have been complaining that Blu-Ray players are too expensive... now they demand Blu-Ray burners now?
Greedy...
This would be a great way to get your feet wet with Blu-Ray. I'd still wait for set-top Blu-Ray players to drop in price.
11/26/08
Yeah, filmmakers need them and use them. A Blu-ray burner lets you make one-off BDs (and regular DVDs) for prototyping/proofing or just plain ol' gift giving.
Blu-ray burners do exist for Macs/PCs, they're just currently priced around $400-600. That's why I was SO excited about what at first sounded like a an internal BD burner...but, alas, is only a player. Great news for those folks who have a computer hooked up to a TV-ish display and want to, as you say, "get their feet wet with Blu-ray" movies, just not so helpful for content creators (or data backup).
11/26/08
11/26/08
11/11/08