The video reminds me of all the times I tried to put Linux partitions on my Mac drives and use a boot loader. Works for a while, only a little while. Eventually you'll do something to kill it.
I've recently become a fan of VM's for alternative OS's. So much easier to experiment with. Doesn't help with the Mac OS though, sorry. #apple
The OS developers at Apple don't give a ragged ass about unsupported setups, if you're using any system off book you're lucky anything works the way you want it to when it is in test mode. The final release will meet broader standards but that still doesn't mean they are debugging for Hackintosh systems. #apple
I'm really surprised that so many people actually bought into this idea. Honest question to those who bought the Rebel EFI: did you try any other method of Hackintoshing before purchasing this? #rebelefi
I am sure that Apple actually likes the Hackintosh minis - I mean, who does it? Fanboys, enthusiasts and those too broke to buy a real Mac. Well the first two groups probably already own real Macs, and the third will buy real Macs when they grow up and get a job. #netbooks
@Canoehead: You're forgetting a subdivision of the third group: Those who have enough money and like the OS but just don't feel like paying $2000 for <$900 worth of hardware. #netbooks
@MarcusMaximus: Sure, but a netbook, even with OSX, is still a pretty limited thing - if you own one, you probably own a desktop too, and likely it's a Mac, since you're in that ecosystem. #netbooks
@Canoehead: I think the real statement should be: "I think Apple actually likes Hackintosh Mini's when they're not created by using a torrented disc. ;) #netbooks
I don't believe Apple would resort to crippling support for the Atom for a couple of possible reasons:
-They have a close relationship with Intel. While Apple is notorious for playing roughly with others, I don't believe that they would want to be at odds with Intel over something like the Atom, or even general artificial discrimination of their OS towards a number of their products.
-They might actually use an improved version of the Atom one day. Though most speculate that Apple will never bother, it sounds like a pretty unreasonable bridge to burn.
Its too bad apple wont just release a special os for non apple products. Its a good way to get new adopters IMO. #snowleopardatomsupporthackintoshnetbook...
@ploopsy: If apple released an OSX compatible with non-apple hardware, they would be in trouble, since people would prefer to buy an less expensive machine. And it would also break the "just works" mantra, since the OSX will have to be compatible with many 3rd party hardware.
Edited by SewerShark: LOOK BEHIND YOU, A THREE HEADED MONKEY!!! at 11/03/09 7:01 AM
SewerShark: LOOK BEHIND YOU, A THREE HEADED MONKEY!!! was starred
SewerShark: LOOK BEHIND YOU, A THREE HEADED MONKEY!!! was unstarred
@SewerShark: LOOK BEHIND YOU, A THREE HEADED MONKEY!!!: Even if they limited the types of 3rd party hardware that will work and charged 300$ for the OS it would still sell and they could afford to support it.
Sucks that we cant have an apple netbook and we have to go with what they dictate. #snowleopardatomsupporthackintoshnetbook...
Preliminarily it certainly looks like the Atom won't work, but it's just speculation until the release is in the wild.
As mentioned, the kernel for OSX is open and replaceable. Should Apple make technical changes to the OS that disable the Atom, a work-around is possible.
Apple likely won't pull "all" support for the chipset, because the GMA 950 is used in 2006 Mac Minis and MacBooks.
As anybody who has a hackintosh (myself included) knows, you never EVER just allow the machine to update without checking the forums to ensure that the update is "safe". And then waiting awhile, anyways.
@savage3006: Thx for that. Although the article only mentions a few. I'm wondering if I can take an old Toshiba Satellite and turn it into a Hackintosh. #snowleopardatomsupporthackintoshnetbook...
01:40 AM
11/07/09
11/07/09
I've recently become a fan of VM's for alternative OS's. So much easier to experiment with. Doesn't help with the Mac OS though, sorry. #apple
11/07/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
(Ducks and covers) #rebelefi
11/05/09
and read how they violated copyright law. #rebelefi
11/05/09
11/05/09
1: Pirate the RebelEFI software or a Mac OS 'installer' disk like iATKOS.
2: Buy a cheap netbook and Hackintosh it with pirated software. #rebelefi
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/06/09
11/04/09
-They have a close relationship with Intel. While Apple is notorious for playing roughly with others, I don't believe that they would want to be at odds with Intel over something like the Atom, or even general artificial discrimination of their OS towards a number of their products.
-They might actually use an improved version of the Atom one day. Though most speculate that Apple will never bother, it sounds like a pretty unreasonable bridge to burn.
11/02/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
Sucks that we cant have an apple netbook and we have to go with what they dictate. #snowleopardatomsupporthackintoshnetbook...
11/02/09
As mentioned, the kernel for OSX is open and replaceable. Should Apple make technical changes to the OS that disable the Atom, a work-around is possible.
Apple likely won't pull "all" support for the chipset, because the GMA 950 is used in 2006 Mac Minis and MacBooks.
As anybody who has a hackintosh (myself included) knows, you never EVER just allow the machine to update without checking the forums to ensure that the update is "safe". And then waiting awhile, anyways.
It's just a part of life off the Apple grid. :-D
Good thread on the topic here:
[www.mydellmini.com] #snowleopardatomsupporthackintoshnetbook...
11/02/09
11/02/09
[gizmodo.com]
#hackintosh
11/02/09
11/02/09
[wiki.osx86project.org]
[www.insanelymac.com] #snowleopardatomsupporthackintoshnetbook...