First iPad Reviews Are In

Illustration for article titled First iPad Reviews Are In

The first iPad reviews are in and so far they're sounding pretty great with very few reservations. Here are the highlights of what the early reviewers are saying:

The WSJ's Walt Mossberg is in love with the iPad's interface and design:

The iPad is an advance in making more-sophisticated computing possible via a simple touch interface on a slender, light device. Only time will tell if it's a real challenger to the laptop and netbook.

Advertisement

USA Today's Edward Baig was impressed:

Apple has pretty much nailed it with this first iPad, though there's certainly room for improvement. Nearly three years after making a splash with the iPhone, Apple has delivered another impressive product that largely lives up to the hype.

Advertisement

NYT's David Pogue was sure to clarify just where the device excels:

The iPad is not a laptop. It's not nearly as good for creating stuff. On the other hand, it's infinitely more convenient for consuming it - books, music, video, photos, Web, e-mail and so on. For most people, manipulating these digital materials directly by touching them is a completely new experience - and a deeply satisfying one.

PC Mag's Tim Gideon also realizes the iPad's limitations, but praises it nonetheless:

Is the iPad a perfect product? No. And the omissions will give the anti-Apple crowd plenty of ammo. Why do I need this extra device that's not a full-fledged laptop? Where's the camera? What about Flash? Um, how about multitasking? These are all valid complaints, but one thing I can say about most Apple products, and certainly the iPad: There may be things it doesn't do, but what it does do, it does remarkably well. Aside from the aforementioned limitations, there isn't a lot else to gripe about. And to my great surprise, you can actually get real work done with the iPad.

Advertisement

The Houston Chronicle's Bob "Dr. Mac" LeVitus agrees with our thoughts that the iPad is a whole new category of mobile devices:

It turns out the iPad isn't as much a laptop replacement as I thought (though it could easily be used as one). Instead, it's an entirely new category of mobile device. For example, now when I want to surf the Web from the couch or back deck, the iPad is the device I choose. Starbucks? Same thing. Think of the iPad as a new arrow in your technology quiver, an arrow that will often be the best tool for a given task.

I had high expectations for the iPad, and it has met or exceeded most of them.

BoingBoing's Xeni Jardin was thinking ahead while trying out the device:

Maybe the most exciting thing about iPad is the apps that aren't here yet. The book-film-game hybrid someone will bust out in a year, redefining the experience of each, and suggesting some new nouns and verbs in the process. Or an augmented reality lens from NASA that lets you hold the thing up to the sky and pinpoint where the ISS is, next to what constellation, read the names and see the faces of the crew members, check how those fuel cells are holding up.

I like it a lot. But it's the things I never knew it made possible - to be revealed or not in the coming months - that will determine whether I love it.

Advertisement

The Chicago Sun-Times' Andy Ihnatko thought the iPad lived up to all the excitement and hype:

The iPad user experience is instantly compelling and elegant. It's not every computer and every function. It's a computer that's designed for speed, mobility, and tactile interaction above all other considerations.

Advertisement

The Root's Omar Wasow thinks the iPad has something for everyone:

Apple pulled off a remarkable balancing act in that it has designed the iPad in such a way that in can simultaneously appeal to both newbies and nerds. For low-tech users looking for an affordable entry-level PC, the iPad is a computer without all the distractions. [...] For the tech-savvy with $500 to drop on a gadget, the iPad offers a convenient way to consume and enjoy digital media without being tethered to a computer all day.

Advertisement

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

jyhash
HashMaster9000

This is getting ridiculous: This thing is almost as polarizing as the Healthcare debate between a Democrat and a Tea Party Protester - No matter how much arguing is done, it's not going to change the fact that its been done (I don't want to start any arguments, just drawing an allegory here). I'm just so sick of the hate. People are judging completely on speculation with the iPad and all these other tablets, just to get the goat of the people looking forward to it. It sickens me and reminds me of all the bad times in high school.

You don't want to buy it because issues with it? Fine. But don't come in here thinking you're going to drop some epic wisdom and expect the people who already want an iPad to send back their pre-order this Saturday. I know you all have the right to your opinions, but coming in here and restating any of the hundred arguments made OVER and OVER again in posts, comments, and various chats isn't helping anyone.

Gizmodo may seem like it over posts on things pertaining to Apple, and perhaps they do. But they post on quite a fair amount of other things as well. Personally I find Gizmodo to be the best laid out and eclectic blog about tech today. Sure there are things that can be improved upon, but honestly, nobody really does it better. I'll be damned if I end up going back to Engadget again, and besides that who else has got the same format? BoingBoing? I have 3 choices. Oh boy. FACT: I'll take the Giz over all of them.

I look in these comment threads and nearly all I see is hate about how Giz is posting something "inconsequential" or how they post nothing but "Apple Propaganda", and these people KEEP COMING BACK. You want to teach Giz a lesson? Don't come back. You won't have to put up with the blog's bias, they lose a reader, and we don't have to hear your repetitive & boring comments. Everybody wins.

And you know the best part of all this? Not one of nearly ANY of your comments matter. Not a one. Apple doesn't base it's Q4 decisions based on if "OMGPonies!" likes a product, Microsoft doesn't fold up shop because "Kaiser-Machead" tolerates (or even likes) Apple Products, and al the rest of the big tech will continue to move forward even though anonymous commenter #1228349 says he doesn't like it on the third page of a comment thread. NONE OF IT GETS READ. And if it does, then it's filed away in the back of someone's mind, but is rarely if ever put into practice much less brought up outside these comment boards. And see, I'd even be afraid of posting something like this, that can be considered inflammatory, and that I'd be skirting the banhammer right now, but I'm 75% sure NO ONE IS GOING TO READ IT. On such a big issue post, this will most likely go into the "later discussions" section and only be read by commenter completists, and that's if they aren't offended by the first 3 paragraphs. And something working against me even more is the fact that I'm not a starred commenter nor will this comment be promoted. See? It's all nonsense.

So I urge you, people flaming the fanboys because you think it's your duty to bust their chops: nobody wants to hear it. It's a tired argument.

I'm not against your freedom to express your opinion, I'm with Thomas Jefferson on the matter, but seriously folks: Pick your battles. As much as you hate to admit it, the iPad will be released on Saturday to an adoring fanbase. And there's not a damn thing you can do about it.