Whatever the reasons are, the cancelation comes twenty years too late. While I can understand the moral, ethical and psychological problems that the idea of unleashing hell upon millions of people may cause to any normal human being, there's absolutely no justification for this religious-based training.

Advertisement

As the MRFF's president points out, this has no place under "the 'no religious test' mandate of the Constitution and the First Amendment's 'No Establishment' clause." But beyond that, what seems repugnant to me is the idea of manipulating Christian ethics to try to brainwash officers into thinking that the launch of nuclear weapons is morally right. Simply because it just can't be, no matter the way you look at it.

I'm not a religious person, but having been raised in Catholicism, the ethics of the Judeo-Christian Mediterranean culture were an integral part of my upbringing. For Jesus, the Bible character, there's no justification for the use of force. Much less for the massive annihilation of humans.

Advertisement

But then again, people have been using religion to justify war against others since the beginning of recorded history, so I'm not surprised about this new elaborated twist. In fact, including a Nazi scientist's idea of morals and the official justification for Hiroshima makes total sense. [Truth-out via Veterans News NowMilitary.com via DoD Buzz]