Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

The Shocking Inside Story of the Epic Defects That Killed Millions of Xbox 360s

Illustration for article titled The Shocking Inside Story of the Epic Defects That Killed Millions of Xbox 360s

Dean Takahashi, one of the most respected tech journos around, spent years putting together this mind-blowing expose that reveals the truly epic scale of the problems that lead to millions of dead Xbox 360s. It really is one of the most stunning flustercucks in gaming history. According to his account, Microsoft willfully ignored deep, systemic problems in the console's production that reached from chipmakers—initially, only 16 out of every 100 of its IBM-made processors worked—to production lines, where just before launch, an unbelievable 68 percent of consoles made were clunkers. Here are a couple of the more jaw-dropping excerpts: Most of the problems pointed to as the cause of the epidemic of Red Rings of Death showed up way before launch, naturally:

In an Aug. 30, 2005 memo, the team reported overheating graphics chip, cracking heat sinks, cosmetic issues with the hard disk drive and the front of the box, under-performing graphics memory chips from Infineon (now Qimonda), a problem with the DVD drive, and other things.

The test machines were not properly debugged, due to an ill-advised cost-cutting initiative that shaved $2 million from $25 million paid to Cimtek, a test machine maker in Canada. The Microsoft team decided not to pay the consulting fee to Cimtek to build, manage and debug the test machines. Sources familiar with the matter said there were only about 500 test machines at the time of launch, a third of the 1,500 needed. "There were so many problems, you didn't know what was wrong," said one source of the machines. "The [test engineers] didn't have enough time to get up and running."

Advertisement

The shortages at launch were in fact largely a product of the Xbox 360's low yields—in Spring 2006, this was the situation:

Microsoft had more than 500,000 defective consoles that sat in warehouses. They were either duds coming out of the factory or they were returned boxes, according to inside sources. The yield was climbing, but far too slowly. The company stood by its statement that returns were within "normal rates for consumer electronics products."

Advertisement

At that time, the yield rate was still only "an abysmal 50 percent on the first pass. When the bad machines were reworked within the factory, the yield went up to 75 percent –- hardly acceptable." It's gotten better now, but still not amazing. As of the beginning of 2008, it's still only 85 percent—meaning for every 100 Xbox 360s produced, 15 don't work. The Falcon revision, which used smaller 65nm chips and had a bunch of other tweaks, like more expensive, better quality heatsinks, alleviated some of the problems, as well as made them cheaper to produce—as many had suspected with their introduction. The latest, the Jasper board, takes that a step further, which Takahashi reports is what allowed them to steeply cut console prices last week. All of this is just a small cut of Takahashi's dense, extremely well-reported feature. If you own an Xbox 360, you owe it to yourself to read. [Venture Beat]

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

photograph
missionary position

Yet again a shining example where a company puts profit and market share ahead of quality control. MS were aware of the failings of the XBOX 360's but would rather beat Sony to market and repair defective consoles as it still meant a sale and an individual invested in their console system and not a rival's hopefully.

I don't think they realised how costly it would end up- don't think they ever envisioned multi-billion dollar write offs for warranty repairs though but it serves them right.

It reminds me of an incident concerning the Aviation industry- i'll ad lib as can't remember all the details but the essence is true.

A crash investigation report highlighted the fact that the front passenger cargo holds of major airlines did not have smoke detector early warning systems fitted. The Airlines response was that the cost of retrofitting their fleets would costs millions and would see little benefit safety wise as the front cargo holds were hermetically sealed (i.e airtight)

However at the time some airlines were transporting spare parts in these holds-the relevance to this story? The cargo included used/spare oxygen generators of the type that are fitted in cabins for when air pressure is lost. When transported correctly and the safety mechanisms in place to prevent accidental firing of these units they were relatively safe- yet still very hazardous cargo.

A mix up at an airline's depot saw these canisters wrongly labeled as general cargo (their firing pins were secured only with string to prevent accidental firing as a stop gap until the proper parts arrived)

They were placed in the front air-tight hold for transport amongst all the other luggage. Shortly after take off, the plane carrying them burst into flames and blew up killing all on board.

The reason- these oxygen generators when ignited reach temperatures of about 500C on the outside of the cannister and as they weren't properly secured set light to the hold- which although 'airtight' now had a supply of oxygen from these canisters. The lack of smoke detectors and suppressant systems in these holds due to cost resulted in the tragic loss of so many lives.

As a direct result of this it is illegal to carry such cargo and the already mentioned safety systems are mandatory on all aircraft.