Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

Does the Technology Make the Writer? I Hope Not

Illustration for article titled Does the Technology Make the Writer? I Hope Not

Over at The Atlantic, Robert Rosenberger has a fascinating and smart piece about technologies like Siri, which take voice dictation and turn it into text, and what kinds of effects they may have on how we write.

Advertisement

As a writer who's being thinking a lot about finding easier ways to write while I have my cat hand out of commission, this is a subject I can really got on board with.

In the future, you will talk to your computer. Voice, the predominant mode of human-to-human communication, has been migrating to silicon for more than a decade and is now poised to hit the mainstream.

Already, voice interfaces have become commonplace in the telephone customer-service industry, have long been of assistance to the blind, and are increasingly used by doctors for transcribing patient information.

[...] So it seems as though our voices may some day displace our keyboards and mice as the primary means through which we manipulate our computing devices. But while to command by voice is one thing, to write by voice is another, and the question remains whether — or how — this shift in technology will shape the words we "pen."

Advertisement

There are all manner of dictation tools to choose from. Mountain Lion's has been lauded by us already. Still, i find myself resisting the kind of services a virtual scribe like Siri or ML has to offer. It's not them, though. It's me. I write slowly. I edit as a I go. (#corrections bullies, hold your tongues, please.) I think and edit and write and go back. I worry the technology would be to snappy and quick for my style. That it would be too good.

Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I'll end up loving it. I'll give it a try, sure. Maybe I'm a little bit like the philosopher Martin Heidegger, who I've also been thinking a lot about lately, and who Rosenberger happens to quote in his essay. Heidegger was quite fearful of the growing influence of the typewriter in the '40s:

In the time of the first dominance of the typewriter, a letter written on this machine still stood for a breach of good manners. Today a hand-written letter is an antiquated and undesired thing; it disturbs speed reading. Mechanical writing deprives the hand of its rank in the realm of the written word and degrades the word to a means of communication. In addition, mechanical writing provides this "advantage" that it conceals the handwriting and thereby the character. The typewriter makes everyone look the same.

Advertisement

Or Joan Didion (who I always think about), who feared she'd never be able to write again, when she first made the transition from typewriter to computer.

I use an IBM Thinkpad. I just use it like a typewriter, but when I started using it in 1987, I thought I won't be able to write anymore, so I thought I'd go back to the typewriter. But you couldn't go back to the typewriter after using the computer, so finally after about a month I got proficient enough that I could actually work on it without being distracted by it, and in fact then it started making me a whole lot more logical than I ever had been. Because the computer was so logical, it was always right, I was wrong ... and the time saved.

Advertisement

This piece is definitely worth reading in its entirety, a brilliant discussion of writer and their technologies and our evolving attitudes toward both.

This isn't a #chatroom, but let's keep the conversation going anyway. I want to hear your thoughts, too. [TheAtlantic]

Advertisement

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

Arai-the fly on the wall

I always think that speaking and writing is two wholly different means of communication.

Writing is a thinking communication, where one constantly trying to transfer some of his thoughts into written form, and seeing it with his/her eyes and it's in the going back and forth between the eyes, the thought, the writing and editing that sums into the final written conclusion.

There's no such thing in spoken languages, when it's out of your mouth, that's done. No edits can ever correct it. Therefore I think that a great writer most probably is also a great thinker, though he might not be one the be an orator.