MegaUpload Goes Through with Record Label Lawsuit Over Mega Song Censorship

Illustration for article titled MegaUpload Goes Through with Record Label Lawsuit Over Mega Song Censorship

Remember that support video for MegaUpload with all the A-List stars? It's been yanked from the Internet because according to Universal's DMCA request, New Zealand artist Meg Gin Wigmore didn't consent to involvement in the project. There were also rumors that issued his own DMCA for the video. Turns out it's all bullshit.


In his lawsuit against Universal, MegaUpload owner Kim Dotcom argues that not only did Universal not hold any rights to the video, but that Gin Witmore was never involved in the project—either in the final cut (which you could have seen if Universal had not had it pulled) or at any point during the production. Her vocals were briefly considered but the production team went with Macy Gray instead.

There was also the Hollywood Reporter article earlier in the week stating that's attorney issued a DMCA of his own. According to Dotcom, he spoke with and received his personal assurance that neither Will nor his representation issued anything of the sort. Dotcom explained in a statement, "On December 12, 2011, I spoke directly with about this issue, and he personally advised me that he absolutely had not authorized the submission of any takedown notice on his behalf." What's more, MegaUpoload's complaint asserts—and includes—licences from each star involved in the project.

So basically, if this evidence prooves to be true, it would mean that Universal has falsely filed a DMCA notice, which opens it to civil liability for damages—hence MegaUpload's suit. And given that the production costs of the video alone reportedly topped $3 million, this could end up getting rather costly for Universal. But, I suppose that's the price of censorship. [Torrent Freak - Image: The AP]



Want to stop piracy? It is dead easy! Overnight!

Just sell any CD, DVD or Blu-ray downloaded via P2P from the authors for one dollar.

And since they are not selling any physical thing which needs to be manufactured, stored, distributed and retailed, it is all profit for them.

Because they are selling something that does not exist. Because they can replicate what they sell at virtually zero cost to the infinite.

That easy! That is the fair price. Not the 10-50 dollars they are now asking for!!!

And copyright should be void no longer than 20 years, at most, after publication, like patents (not never, like now). And do not forget that the audio and video industry have been selling, re-selling and re-reselling the same to the same people for years (remember the VHS - DVD - Blu-ray - iTunes; cassette - CD - iTunes). That is an abuse. Now, time to compensate or else Internet is here for that!