But “most of these particles” with three or more quarks “containing two heavy quarks, charm or beauty, have not yet been found,” said Koppenburg. “This is the first in a sense.”

In a sense, said Koppenburg, because there’s a contested result from as early as 2002, when the SELEX collaboration at Fermilab in Illinois announced that they’d found a related particle called the Ξcc+, the singly-charged, doubly charmed xi particle (that’s one plus sign instead of two). That particle also has two charm quarks, but has a down quark instead of an up quark like the new xi from LHCb. The one plus sign-xi also has an elemental charge of one, like a proton.

Koppenburg said that several other experiments have failed to reproduce SELEX’s particle. And this new particle casts further doubt on the SELEX discovery. “This one,” the LHCb’s new particle, “had a mass so different than the mass from the SELEX collaboration that it makes their mass unlikely,” said Koppenburg. The new xi particle weighs around 3600 MeV, or four times the mass of the proton. SELEX’s similar-but-different xi particle weighs about 100 MeV less, despite differing in composition only by the very light up or down quarks.

But the new CERN paper, which will be published in an upcoming edition of Physical Review Letters, points out that past attempts to recreate SELEX’s xi particle were different kinds of experiments than SELEX, so those “null results do not exclude the original observations.”


I reached out to James Russ, Professor of Physics at Carnegie Mellon and one of SELEX’s spokespeople, who was only just sitting down to read the new paper when I called. He reminded me that the two particles in question are different and that SELEX’s results were very clean. He stands by his experiment’s observed particle but remarked that LHCb’s results are certainly important. “Having a new observation will push theory in a certain direction,” he said, “so this is definitely an important observation.”

When Russ finished looking over the LHCb paper, he told Gizmodo: “The LHCb observation is very solid.” As far as the third, lighter quarks causing such a large mass difference, he’s said it’s unlikely to be related to differences arising from the quarks’ properties. “Both experiments seem to have done their analysis correctly,” he said. “If both particles are really there, there is a theoretical question about how two charm-charm-quark systems can behave so differently.”


None of this stuff is easy. Scientists are looking for incredibly elusive particles that exist for less than a picosecond, or a trillionth of a second. But since they’re moving at nearly the speed of light, they still travel a few millimeters before decaying into particles detected by the trails they leave in the LHCb experiment. Specific particles can set off a trigger letting the experiment know to keep the data on the event to analyze later. Reconstructing the specific tracks the particles left allows researchers to determine whether they spotted their xi.

And that particle must emerge as a signal over all of the background noise caused by other physics and other particles flying through the detector. In this case, the scientists saw a “12-sigma” significance, meaning it’s incredibly unlikely that their observations were random noise that just so happened to look like the new xi particle.


Regardless of past results, the LHCb scientists I spoke with pointed out that this new particle will allow them to better understand particle physics in general, and continue refining their theories about what quarks do when they stick together.

“We’re understanding that there are more complicated structures in nature than we thought there were before,” Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University physicist, told Gizmodo. This new xi particle can’t really exist on Earth except for in experiments, but probably existed right after the Big Bang when things were a lot hotter and closer together. Understanding the ways quarks could arrange themselves might offer further insights into the physics of that primordial era.


And while disproving a theory is exciting, this new xi seems to have the mass theorists expected, said Stone.

“This time we made the theorists happy.”


Update 9/11/17: The LHCb Collaboration published the paper detailing the discovery today in the journal Physical Review Letters.