Paypal: Dying While Owing Us Money Is Unacceptable to Us

Illustration for article titled Paypal: Dying While Owing Us Money Is Unacceptable to Us
Photo: Jeff Chiu (AP)

E-payments company Paypal sent a deceased customer an email more or less stating that the cessation of life functions—and thus an inability for the customer in question to clear their remaining account balance—was a violation of site policy.


Per the BBC, after 37-year-old UK woman Lindsay Durdle died of breast cancer that had spread to her lungs and brain on May 31st, 2018, her husband Howard Durdle says he provided Paypal with documentation including “her death certificate, her will and his ID, as requested.”

In response, Paypal wrote the Durdle household a letter reading in part:

Dear Mrs. Lindsay Durdle,

This is a default notice served under section 87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Your account has an outstanding balance of £3,240.72.

Provision of Agreement Breached

You are in breach of condition 15-4(c) of your agreement with Paypal Credit as we have received notice that you are deceased. In accordance with condition 15-4(c), we are entitled to close your account, terminate your agreement and demand repayment of the full amount outstanding.

Nature of Breach

This breach is not capable of remedy.

The letter continued to say that Paypal was taking actions including limiting or restricting credit limits and immediately demanding repayment.

According to the BBC, Paypal staff told Durdle that this was not supposed to happen, that it was either the result of a bug, bad template, or human error, and written off the debt in the meantime. Durdle told the news agency that while he was “in a reasonable place at the moment,” he is a member of Widowed and Young charity and “seen first-hand in there how a letter like this or something like it can completely derail somebody.”

According to the Next Web, Paypal sent over a statement apologizing for the incident:

We apologise unreservedly to Mr Durdle for the understandable distress this letter has caused. As soon as we became aware of this mistake, we contacted Mr Durdle directly to offer our support, cleared the outstanding debt and closed down his wife’s account as he requested. We are urgently reviewing our internal processes to ensure this does not happen again.


Though this kind of screwup is unacceptable, at least it appears Paypal acknowledged the mistake. As Motherboard reported in 2016, at least in the US, debt collectors have become adept at harassing recently bereaved families of the dead to put them in contact with estate administrators or even personally repay debts, even when they have no legal obligation to pay up.



"... An upperclassman who had been researching terrorist groups online." - Washington Post



Not sure how it works in the UK, where I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re more generous, but here if there’s an “estate” that estate must repay all debts if it can. If it cannot due to lack of assets then sometimes it gets written off but not automatically. If you’re married, you almost always owe the money, legally. Marriage is a contract and more than just about “love”.

Whether the company will let you off is one thing or another but if they do, you still owe taxes on that forgiven debt unless they don’t report it and truly eat it...

Basically, if someone dies and no one gets anything or there’s truly nothing left and you have no legal obligations to the deceased, such as marriage depending on your State, the debt doesn’t transfer.

But otherwise it absolutely can, does and in the case of married couples, makes perfect sense. Marriage is no fucking joke. It’s explicitly about legal assets and legal rights. There’s both good and bad to it.